University of Glasgow, UK.
University of Edinburgh, UK.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;57(6):763-774. doi: 10.1177/1363461520962603. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Although Islam is the world's second-largest religion, there continues to be misconceptions and an overall lack of awareness regarding the religious and social worlds that make up the global Muslim community. This is particularly concerning when examining notions of mental ill-health, where a lack of cultural awareness, understanding, and sensitivity can impede adequate treatment. As a global religion, Islam is practiced within various cultural milieus, and, given the centrality of faith amongst Muslim communities, a conflation of religion and culture can occur when attempting to understand mental health paradigms. Whilst much of the discourse regarding Muslim mental health centres on cultural formulations, this article discusses how, historically, conceptualisations relating to medicine and mental health were ensconced within the particular medical paradigm of the day. Specifically, it considers the frameworks within which mental health and illness were understood within the medieval Muslim medical tradition and their relevance to contemporary debates in psychology and psychiatry. In sum, this paper seeks to demonstrate that cultural formulations of mental illness, often viewed as "Islamic", are distinct from historical Islamic approaches to mental health which employed contemporaneous medical discourse and which act as the reference marker for the emergent revivalist Islamic psychology movement seen today.
尽管伊斯兰教是世界第二大宗教,但对于构成全球穆斯林社区的宗教和社会世界,仍然存在误解和普遍缺乏认识。在审视心理健康观念时,这种情况尤其令人担忧,因为缺乏文化意识、理解和敏感性会阻碍适当的治疗。作为一种全球性宗教,伊斯兰教在各种文化环境中得到实践,而且鉴于穆斯林社区中信仰的核心地位,在试图理解心理健康范式时,宗教和文化可能会混为一谈。虽然关于穆斯林心理健康的大部分讨论都集中在文化观念上,但本文讨论了历史上与医学和心理健康相关的概念是如何根植于当时特定的医学范例中的。具体来说,它考虑了在中世纪穆斯林医学传统中理解心理健康和疾病的框架,以及它们与心理学和精神病学当代辩论的相关性。总之,本文旨在表明,通常被视为“伊斯兰”的精神疾病的文化观念与历史上的伊斯兰心理健康方法不同,后者采用了当代医学话语,并作为当今新兴的复兴主义伊斯兰心理学运动的参考标记。