Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):e039418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039418.
To review and summarise the available literature regarding breastfeeding experiences of medical students, residents and physicians.
Articles of any design, including non-peer reviewed data that examine the experiences of breast feeding of medical students, residents and staff physicians.
Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science.
All peer-reviewed studies underwent risk-of-bias assessment using relevant tools, depending on the study design.
We included 71 citations; 51 surveys, 3 narrative descriptions, 9 editorials or letters to the editor, and 3 reviews.
Included articles were heterogeneous with respect to their study design, target population and outcomes reported. Most articles had a high risk of bias. Only five articles reported the impact of an intervention.
Despite heterogeneity, the majority of articles described important barriers to breast feeding for physicians, residents and medical students. These barriers were similar across studies, and included inadequate and inaccessible space, time constraints and inflexible scheduling, and lack of colleague support. The consequences of these barriers included low milk supply and early discontinuation of breast feeding.
Due to the observed heterogeneity of articles identified in this review, we are unable to assess trends in barriers or duration of breastfeeding over time.
Interventions to overcome systemic and cultural barriers to breast feeding are needed to meet legal obligations of workplaces for physicians and trainees. These interventions should be formally evaluated using implementation science or quality improvement methods.
综述和总结有关医学生、住院医师和医生母乳喂养经验的现有文献。
任何设计的文章,包括非同行评审数据,都可以考察医学生、住院医师和主治医生母乳喂养的经验。
Ovid MEDLINE(R)和 Epub 提前印刷、处理中和其他非索引引文以及每日、Ovid EMBASE、Scopus 和 Web of Science。
所有同行评审的研究都根据研究设计使用相关工具进行了偏倚风险评估。
我们纳入了 71 篇引文;51 项调查、3 篇叙述性描述、9 篇社论或给编辑的信,以及 3 篇综述。
纳入的文章在研究设计、目标人群和报告的结果方面存在异质性。大多数文章的偏倚风险较高。只有五篇文章报告了干预的影响。
尽管存在异质性,但大多数文章描述了医生、住院医师和医学生母乳喂养的重要障碍。这些障碍在研究中是相似的,包括空间不足和难以接近、时间限制和缺乏灵活性、以及缺乏同事支持。这些障碍的后果包括乳汁供应不足和早期停止母乳喂养。
由于本综述中确定的文章存在明显的异质性,我们无法评估随时间推移障碍或母乳喂养持续时间的趋势。
需要采取干预措施来克服母乳喂养的系统和文化障碍,以满足医生和受训者工作场所的法律义务。这些干预措施应使用实施科学或质量改进方法进行正式评估。