• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Heart Team-the Indian perspective.心脏团队——印度视角
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;34(Suppl 3):355-361. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0764-6. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
2
Drug, devices, technologies, and techniques for blood management in minimally invasive and conventional cardiothoracic surgery: a consensus statement from the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2011.微创和传统心胸外科手术中血液管理的药物、器械、技术与方法:国际微创心胸外科协会(ISMICS)2011年共识声明
Innovations (Phila). 2012 Jul-Aug;7(4):229-41. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182747699.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
5
Revascularization heart team recommendations as an adjunct to appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with complex coronary artery disease.血运重建心脏团队建议作为复杂冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉血运重建适当使用标准的辅助措施。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;88(4):E103-E112. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26276. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.缺血性心脏病管理的API专家共识文件
J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80.
7
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/EACTS/HVS/SCA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Valve Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会适当使用标准专家组、美国胸外科学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、欧洲心血管外科学会、心脏瓣膜学会、心血管麻醉师学会、心血管血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会和胸外科医师学会 2017 年严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗的适当使用标准:报告
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 Feb;31(2):117-147. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
8
Surgical intensive care - current and future challenges?外科重症监护——当前及未来的挑战?
Qatar Med J. 2020 Jan 13;2019(2):3. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.3. eCollection 2019.
9
10
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease : A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会/美国胸外科医师协会/美国心脏协会/美国超声心动图学会/美国核心脏病学会/心律学会/心血管造影和介入学会/心血管计算机断层扫描学会/心血管磁共振学会/胸外科医师协会2019年非瓣膜性心脏病心脏结构和功能评估中多模态成像的合理使用标准:美国心脏病学会合理使用标准工作组、美国胸外科医师协会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核心脏病学会、心律学会、心血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会及胸外科医师协会的报告
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):1392-1413. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01751-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Managing Choledocholithiasis and Acute Cholangitis in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Review.老年患者胆总管结石及急性胆管炎管理的进展:一项综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 4;17(2):e78492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78492. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
'Heart Team' Concept - A reality or a 'Platonic Illusion'.“心脏团队”概念——是现实还是“柏拉图式的幻想”。
Indian Heart J. 2017 Sep-Oct;69(5):681-683. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
3
Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的疗效与手术特征及术者手术量的关系
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 20;69(24):2913-2924. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.032.
4
Specialist intervention is associated with improved patient outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure: evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient heart failure team.专科干预与失代偿性心力衰竭患者改善的预后相关:多学科住院心力衰竭团队影响的评估
Open Heart. 2017 Mar 8;4(1):e000547. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000547. eCollection 2017.
5
2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会对2014年《美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南》的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 11;70(2):252-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
6
Trends in Coronary Heart Disease Epidemiology in India.印度冠心病流行病学趋势。
Ann Glob Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;82(2):307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.04.002.
7
Applying appropriate-use criteria to cardiac revascularisation in India.在印度将适当使用标准应用于心脏血运重建。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 30;6(3):e010345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010345.
8
Time to revisit super-speciality training programs in cardiology in India.是时候重新审视印度心脏病学超专科培训项目了。
Indian Heart J. 2015 Nov-Dec;67(6):518-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.10.378. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
9
The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature.多学科团队会议对肿瘤学环境中患者评估、管理和结局的影响:文献系统评价。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
10
Structure and functioning of a multidisciplinary 'Heart Team' for patients with coronary artery disease: rationale and recommendations from a joint BCS/BCIS/SCTS working group.冠心病患者多学科“心脏团队”的结构与运作:英国心血管学会/英国心血管介入学会/心胸外科医师学会联合工作组的基本原理与建议
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Oct;48(4):524-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv083. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

心脏团队——印度视角

Heart Team-the Indian perspective.

作者信息

Sarkar Kunal

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medica Superspecialty Hospital, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;34(Suppl 3):355-361. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0764-6. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1007/s12055-018-0764-6
PMID:33060959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7525544/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery as well as the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart association have recognized the "Heart Team" as the best option for a patient centric treatment strategy and has granted a class I recommendation for its formation. The aim of this review is to discuss the evolution, scope and composition, the benefits, and problems inherent in its implementation in the Indian scenario.

METHODS

A review of articles on Heart Team from cardiac surgery as well as multidisciplinary meetings from other specialties was performed. Advantages of Heart Team formation and its implementation have been critically evaluated and its applicability to the Indian scenario considered in particular.

RESULTS

Heart Team formation is associated with many positives. Concern remains about the implementation of Heart Team approach in its true sense. Heart Team-led decisions are definitely patient centric despite multiple challenges in resource-limited environments.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the challenges, a multidisciplinary team approach in the form of Heart Team is recommended and its implementation possible in India. However, adjustments to the mechanism of implementation are required. Further research needs to focus on creating models for implementation and assessment of these models in terms of cost effectiveness, improved patient outcomes, and patient satisfaction in the process.

摘要

目的

欧洲心脏病学会、欧洲心胸外科学会以及美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会都认可“心脏团队”是患者为中心治疗策略的最佳选择,并对其组建给予了 I 类推荐。本综述的目的是讨论其在印度情况下的演变、范围和组成、益处以及实施中固有的问题。

方法

对心脏外科关于心脏团队的文章以及其他专业的多学科会议进行了综述。对心脏团队组建及其实施的优势进行了严格评估,并特别考虑了其在印度情况下的适用性。

结果

心脏团队的组建有诸多积极意义。对心脏团队方法的真正实施仍存在担忧。尽管在资源有限的环境中存在多重挑战,但由心脏团队主导的决策绝对是以患者为中心的。

结论

尽管存在挑战,但仍建议采用心脏团队形式的多学科团队方法,并且在印度是可行的。然而,需要对实施机制进行调整。进一步的研究需要专注于创建实施模型,并在成本效益、改善患者结局以及过程中的患者满意度方面对这些模型进行评估。