Claydon Elizabeth A, DeFazio Caterina, Lilly Christa L, Zullig Keith J
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, West Virginia University School of Public Health, One Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9190, Morgantown, WV 26506-9190 USA.
Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, WV USA.
J Eat Disord. 2020 Oct 13;8:53. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-00326-z. eCollection 2020.
The primary objective was to understand life satisfaction (LS) of patients with eating disorders (EDs) in relation to eating pathology severity, personal/familial ED history, and key demographic and anthropometric variables.
Participants ( = 60) completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the Eating Pathology Severity Index (EPSI), and demographic questionnaires. Bivariate associations via correlations and multiple linear regression models were used to explore these relationships.
The SWLS mean score was 3.7 out of 7, suggesting it is below the population-based norm. LS was positively statistically significantly associated with private insurance, past ED, EPSI muscle building, EPSI restricted eating, and EPSI negative attitudes. When included in multiple linear regression, the model explained 33% of the variability of LS [F (7, 56) = 3.4, = 0.0054, R = 0.33]. EPSI muscle building remained the strongest predictor (β = 0.13, = 0.04).
Based on the data, individuals who have/have had EDs scored lower on the SWLS than the general population. Individuals scoring within this range typically experience significant issues in several areas of life or a substantial issue in one area.
主要目的是了解饮食失调(ED)患者的生活满意度(LS)与饮食病理学严重程度、个人/家族性饮食失调病史以及关键人口统计学和人体测量学变量之间的关系。
参与者(n = 60)完成了生活满意度量表(SWLS)、饮食病理学严重程度指数(EPSI)和人口统计学问卷。通过相关性和多元线性回归模型进行双变量关联分析,以探讨这些关系。
SWLS平均得分为7分中的3.7分,表明低于基于人群的常模。生活满意度与私人保险、既往饮食失调、EPSI肌肉锻炼、EPSI限制饮食和EPSI消极态度呈正相关且具有统计学意义。纳入多元线性回归时,该模型解释了生活满意度变异性的33%[F(7, 56)= 3.4,p = 0.0054,R = 0.33]。EPSI肌肉锻炼仍然是最强的预测因素(β = 0.13,p = 0.04)。
基于这些数据,患有/曾患有饮食失调的个体在SWLS上的得分低于一般人群。在此范围内得分的个体通常在生活的几个方面经历重大问题,或在一个方面存在重大问题。