• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在多发性硬化综合护理中心确定患者优先事项:超越患者报告结果

Obtaining Patient Priorities in a Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center: Beyond Patient-Reported Outcomes.

作者信息

Miller Deborah M, Moss Brandon, Rose Susannah, Li Hong, Schindler David, Weber Malory, Planchon Sarah M, Alberts Jay, Boissy Adrienne, Bermel Robert

机构信息

Mellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.

Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Aug;7(4):541-548. doi: 10.1177/2374373519864011. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1177/2374373519864011
PMID:33062876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7534123/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order to provide patient center care, our multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic assesses patient concerns before clinical encounters, first by asking the optional qualitative question "What is the most important thing you what your health-care provider to know today" (most important concern of the patient [MIPC]) and then completing quantitative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL). Both sets of questions are designed to facilitate encounters that address patients' values and preferences.

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether the qualitative MIPC responses provided unique information not included in PROMs or clinical assessments.

METHODS

We randomly selected 400 first-time MIPC responders and 400 first-time MIPC nonresponders from 2788 participants in our database. We categorized MIPC responses by content and number of unique concerns and appended them to the Neuro-QoL framework. Nonresponders were compared to those who provided 1 and 2 or more responses.

RESULTS

Several MIPCs MS symptoms categories were added to the Neuro-QoL Physical domain. Most important concern of the patients work and cost-of-care categories were added to the Social Domain. Domains regarding treatment satisfaction and disease management were added. Two hundred thirty (58%) MIPC respondents reported 1 concern, 140 (35%) expressed 2 to 6 concerns, and 30 (7%) reported MS-unrelated concerns and not analyzed. Physical symptoms were the most common MIPC (69.9%). Respondents with more concerns were more likely African American, lacked private insurance, and worse disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Importantly, MIPC responders described idiosyncratic symptoms, disease management, and social concerns not included in the PROMS, suggesting the MIPC question offered patients a unique opportunity to share specific concerns with their providers.

摘要

背景

为了提供以患者为中心的护理,我们的多发性硬化症(MS)诊所会在临床诊疗前评估患者的关切,首先会询问一个可选的定性问题“你今天希望你的医疗服务提供者了解的最重要的事情是什么”(患者最重要的关切[MIPC]),然后完成包括神经疾病生活质量(Neuro-QoL)在内的定量患者报告结局测量(PROMs)。这两组问题旨在促进能解决患者价值观和偏好的诊疗过程。

目的

确定定性的MIPC回答是否提供了PROMs或临床评估中未包含的独特信息。

方法

我们从数据库中的2788名参与者中随机选择了400名首次回答MIPC的人和400名首次未回答MIPC的人。我们根据内容和独特关切的数量对MIPC回答进行分类,并将其附加到Neuro-QoL框架中。将未回答者与提供了1条以及2条或更多回答的人进行比较。

结果

几个MIPC的MS症状类别被添加到Neuro-QoL身体领域。患者最重要的关切工作和护理费用类别被添加到社会领域。增加了关于治疗满意度和疾病管理的领域。230名(58%)MIPC回答者报告了1个关切,140名(35%)表达了2至6个关切,30名(7%)报告了与MS无关的关切且未进行分析。身体症状是最常见的MIPC(69.9%)。有更多关切的回答者更有可能是非裔美国人,缺乏私人保险,且残疾情况更差。

结论

重要的是,MIPC回答者描述了PROMs中未包含的特殊症状、疾病管理和社会关切,这表明MIPC问题为患者提供了一个与医疗服务提供者分享特定关切的独特机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/40d20ed95f08/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/e1d5a82c45f5/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/b28f4147a757/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/7255ef7bc483/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/40d20ed95f08/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/e1d5a82c45f5/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/b28f4147a757/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/7255ef7bc483/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91f/7534123/40d20ed95f08/10.1177_2374373519864011-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Obtaining Patient Priorities in a Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center: Beyond Patient-Reported Outcomes.在多发性硬化综合护理中心确定患者优先事项:超越患者报告结果
J Patient Exp. 2020 Aug;7(4):541-548. doi: 10.1177/2374373519864011. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
2
Technology-enabled comprehensive characterization of multiple sclerosis in clinical practice.在临床实践中应用技术实现多发性硬化症的全面特征分析。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Feb;38:101525. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101525. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Conceptual Underpinnings of the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Comparisons of Core Sets for Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord Injury, and Traumatic Brain Injury.神经疾病生活质量的概念基础(Neuro-QoL):中风、多发性硬化症、脊髓损伤和外伤性脑损伤核心集的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1763-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Patient perspectives on patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis treatment trajectories: A qualitative study of why, what, and how?患者对多发性硬化症治疗轨迹中患者报告结局的看法:一项关于为何、什么以及如何进行的定性研究?
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Feb;58:103475. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103475. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
9
A Population-Based Investigation of Health-Care Needs and Preferences in American Adults With Multiple Sclerosis.一项基于人群的美国成年多发性硬化症患者医疗需求与偏好调查。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Feb;7(1):34-41. doi: 10.1177/2374373518812078. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
10
The impact of quality of life on treatment preferences in multiple sclerosis patients.生活质量对多发性硬化症患者治疗偏好的影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Oct 19;11:1789-1796. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S142373. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Fox Insight: Most Bothersome Symptoms in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease.福克斯洞察:帕金森病早期最恼人的症状
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;12(4):510-515. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.14321. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
The Parkinson's disease waiting room of the future: measurements, not magazines.未来帕金森病候诊室:关注的是测量数据,而非杂志。
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 21;14:1212113. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1212113. eCollection 2023.
3
What Patients Say: Large-Scale Analyses of Replies to the Parkinson's Disease Patient Report of Problems (PD-PROP).

本文引用的文献

1
Systemwide Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Clinical Care at a Children's Hospital.一家儿童医院在常规临床护理中对患者报告结局进行全系统实施。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Aug;44(8):441-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
2
Unmet needs, burden of treatment, and patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: A combined perspective from the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group.多发性硬化症未满足的需求、治疗负担和患者参与:21 世纪多发性硬化症指导小组的综合观点。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Jan;19:153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Role in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.
患者说:帕金森病患者报告问题(PD-PROP)的大规模分析回复。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2023;13(5):757-767. doi: 10.3233/JPD-225083.
4
Individual Differences in the Patient Experience of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS): A Multi-Country Qualitative Exploration of Drivers of Treatment Preferences Among People Living with RMS.复发型多发性硬化症患者体验的个体差异(RMS):对 RMS 患者治疗偏好驱动因素的多国定性探索。
Patient. 2023 Jul;16(4):345-357. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00617-y. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
患者报告结局的演变及其在多发性硬化症临床试验中的作用。
Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Oct;14(4):934-944. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0571-6.
4
Architectural frameworks: defining the structures for implementing learning health systems.架构框架:定义实施学习型健康系统的结构
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 23;12(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0607-7.
5
Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis.低对比度字母视力作为多发性硬化症视觉功能结果测量指标的有效性。
Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):734-747. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690822. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
Validating Neuro-QoL short forms and targeted scales with people who have multiple sclerosis.与患有多发性硬化症的人群一起验证神经生活质量简表和针对性量表。
Mult Scler. 2016 May;22(6):830-41. doi: 10.1177/1352458515599450. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
7
Neuro-QOL: brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology.神经生活质量量表(Neuro-QOL):用于神经病学临床研究的健康相关生活质量的简短测量工具。
Neurology. 2012 Jun 5;78(23):1860-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f744. Epub 2012 May 9.
8
Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing.神经生活质量量表(Neuro-QOL):用于神经障碍成人的生活质量量表条目库:基于临床和一般人群测试的条目开发和标定。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Apr;21(3):475-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9958-8. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
9
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)开发并测试了其第一波成人自我报告健康结局项目库:2005-2008 年。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
10
Development of the Patient Activation Measure for mental health.患者心理健康激活度量表的制定。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Jul;37(4):327-33. doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0239-6. Epub 2009 Aug 29.