van Hout Ben, Hawe Emma, Cohen Alexander T
Health Economics and Decision Science Division, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Data Analytics and Design Strategy Division, RTI-Health Solutions, Manchester, United Kingdom.
TH Open. 2020 Sep 23;4(3):e245-e254. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716496. eCollection 2020 Jul.
In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as edoxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban are more convenient, safer, and just as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Limited information is known about the effects of patient characteristics on VTE efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs, without appropriate effect modifier adjustment comparisons of DOACs may be biased. This study considers the effect of variables that can modify the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin, using patient-level data. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes in the HOKUSAI-VTE study were VTE recurrence and clinically relevant bleeding, respectively. Potential effect modifiers were age, creatinine clearance, and weight. The relationship between the percentage of time in international normalized ratio (INR) control and outcomes were considered for the warfarin arm. Univariate and multivariate regression were performed for each patient characteristic. The relationship between treatment and VTE recurrence differed by age (interaction = 0.007) and by creatinine clearance ( = 0.05). VTE recurrence differed by age for patients in the warfarin arm but not for those in the edoxaban arm and differed by INR control in the warfarin arm ( < 0.005). A stronger relationship between creatinine clearance and clinically relevant bleeding was found in the warfarin arm than in the edoxaban arm ( = 0.04). Clinically relevant bleeding differed by the percentage of time in INR control in the warfarin arm ( < 0.005). Age appeared to be a more important effect modifier than creatinine clearance in patients with VTE. The finding that efficacy in older patients was greater for those taking edoxaban than for those taking warfarin in the HOKUSAI-VTE study needs further investigation. Modification of the treatment effect by age for those taking warfarin might bias estimates of comparative effectiveness among DOACs if VKAs are the reference treatment.
在静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者中,依度沙班、阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班等直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)比维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)更方便、更安全且疗效相当。与VKAs相比,关于患者特征对DOACs治疗VTE的疗效和安全性的影响,已知信息有限,若未进行适当的效应修饰因素调整,DOACs的比较可能存在偏差。本研究使用患者水平的数据,考量了可能改变依度沙班和华法林疗效及安全性的变量的影响。
在HOKUSAI-VTE研究中,主要疗效和安全性结局分别为VTE复发和临床相关出血。潜在的效应修饰因素为年龄、肌酐清除率和体重。对华法林组,考虑了国际标准化比值(INR)处于控制范围内的时间百分比与结局之间的关系。针对每个患者特征进行了单变量和多变量回归分析。
治疗与VTE复发之间的关系因年龄(交互作用 = 0.007)和肌酐清除率( = 0.05)而异。华法林组患者的VTE复发因年龄而异,但依度沙班组患者并非如此,且华法林组的VTE复发因INR控制情况而异( < 0.005)。与依度沙班组相比,华法林组中肌酐清除率与临床相关出血之间的关系更强( = 0.04)。华法林组的临床相关出血因INR控制时间百分比而异( < 0.005)。在VTE患者中,年龄似乎是比肌酐清除率更重要的效应修饰因素。
在HOKUSAI-VTE研究中,服用依度沙班的老年患者比服用华法林的老年患者疗效更佳这一发现需要进一步研究。若以VKAs作为对照治疗,服用华法林的患者因年龄导致的治疗效果改变可能会使DOACs之间比较疗效的估计产生偏差。