Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):438-446. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06293-0. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
The Overuse Index (OI), previously called the Johns Hopkins Overuse Index, is developed and validated as a composite measure of systematic overuse/low-value care using United States claims data. However, no information is available concerning whether the external validation of the OI is sustained, especially for international application. Moreover, little is known about which supply and demand factors are associated with the OI.
We used nationwide population-based data from Taiwan to externally validate the OI and to examine the association of regional healthcare resources and socioeconomic factors with the OI.
We analyzed 1,994,636 beneficiaries randomly selected from all people enrolled in the Taiwan National Health Insurance in 2013.
The OI was calculated for 2013 to 2015 for each of 50 medical regions. Spearman correlation analysis was applied to examine the association of the OI with total medical costs per capita and mortality rate. Generalized estimating equation linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of regional healthcare resources (number of hospital beds per 1000 population, number of physicians per 1000 population, and proportion of primary care physicians [PCPs]) and socioeconomic factors (proportion of low-income people and proportion of population aged 20 and older without a high school diploma) with the OI.
Higher scores of the OI were associated with higher total medical costs per capita (ρ = 0.48, P < 0.001) and not associated with total mortality (ρ = - 0.01, P = 0.882). Higher proportions of PCPs and higher proportions of low-income people were associated with lower scores of the OI (β = - 0.022, P = 0.016 and β = - 0.224, P < 0.001, respectively).
Our study supported the external validation of the OI by demonstrating a similar association within a universal healthcare system, and it showed the association of a higher proportion of PCPs and a higher proportion of low-income people with less overuse/low-value care.
过度使用指数(OI),以前称为约翰霍普金斯过度使用指数,是使用美国索赔数据开发和验证的一种系统过度使用/低价值护理的综合衡量标准。然而,关于 OI 的外部验证是否持续,特别是对于国际应用,没有信息。此外,人们对与 OI 相关的供需因素知之甚少。
我们使用来自台湾的全国性基于人群的数据对 OI 进行外部验证,并研究区域医疗保健资源和社会经济因素与 OI 的关系。
我们分析了 2013 年从所有参加台湾全民健康保险的人中随机抽取的 1994636 名被保险人。
计算了 2013 年至 2015 年的 OI,每个医疗区 50 个。采用斯皮尔曼相关分析来检验 OI 与人均医疗费用和死亡率的关系。进行广义估计方程线性回归分析,以检验区域医疗资源(每千人病床数、每千人医生数和初级保健医生比例)和社会经济因素(低收入人群比例和 20 岁及以上人群中未完成高中学业的人群比例)与 OI 的关系。
OI 得分较高与人均医疗费用较高(ρ=0.48,P<0.001)相关,与总死亡率无关(ρ=-0.01,P=0.882)。较高比例的初级保健医生和较高比例的低收入人群与 OI 得分较低相关(β=-0.022,P=0.016 和β=-0.224,P<0.001)。
我们的研究通过在全民医疗体系中证明了类似的相关性,支持了 OI 的外部验证,并表明了较高比例的初级保健医生和较高比例的低收入人群与较少的过度使用/低价值护理相关。