Suppr超能文献

使用牙科植入物愈合基台会引发免疫反应:解毒策略的比较分析。

Used dental implant healing abutments elicit immune responses: A comparative analysis of detoxification strategies.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):730-738. doi: 10.1111/cid.12956. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if healing abutments (HA) can be "decontaminated" using four strategies available in clinical settings and compare the detoxification efficacy by quantifying residual biomaterial and capacity to elicit an inflammatory response in-vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty HA collected from subjects following intraoral use were randomly distributed into four test groups (A-D): A: autoclave only, B: ultrasonic bath plus autoclave, C: prophy-jet plus autoclave, and D: Scrub sponge plus autoclave. New, sterile HA: group E (Control). Residual protein concentration was determined by Micro BCA assay and stained with Phloxine B for macroscopic examination. HA were placed in human CD14+ monocyte derived-macrophage (mo-Mφ) cultures and supernatant collected at 4, 24, 48, and 5 days to analyze cytokine profiles using multiplex bead assay.

RESULTS

Test groups showed visible differences in "decontamination" levels compared to control. Groups C and D showed most effective debris removal and lowest residual protein concentration. Multiplex assay showed marked induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines by groups A and B and to a significantly lower level by groups C and D.

CONCLUSION

HA were not entirely "decontaminated" using common methods available relative to new, sterile HA and were capable of stimulating an immune response.

摘要

目的

确定在临床环境中可用的四种策略是否可以“净化”愈合基台,并通过定量残留生物材料和体外引发炎症反应的能力来比较解毒效果。

材料和方法

从口腔内使用后的受试者中收集了 40 个愈合基台,将其随机分为四组(A-D):A:仅高压灭菌,B:超声浴加高压灭菌,C:Prophy-jet 加高压灭菌,D:擦洗海绵加高压灭菌。新的、无菌的愈合基台:组 E(对照组)。通过 Micro BCA 测定法测定残留蛋白浓度,并通过 Phloxine B 染色进行宏观检查。将愈合基台放入人 CD14+单核细胞衍生的巨噬细胞(mo-Mφ)培养物中,并在 4、24、48 和 5 天收集上清液,使用多重珠粒测定法分析细胞因子谱。

结果

与对照组相比,测试组在“净化”水平上显示出明显差异。组 C 和组 D 显示出最有效的清除碎片和最低的残留蛋白浓度。多重分析显示,组 A 和组 B 引起了明显的促炎细胞因子诱导,而组 C 和组 D 的诱导水平明显较低。

结论

与新的、无菌的愈合基台相比,常用的方法不能完全“净化”愈合基台,并且能够刺激免疫反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验