Itu Lucian, Neumann Dominik, Mihalef Viorel, Meister Felix, Kramer Martin, Gulsun Mehmet, Kelm Marcus, Kühne Titus, Sharma Puneet
Corporate Technology, Siemens SRL, Brasov, Romania.
Department of Automation and Information Technology, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Interface Focus. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):20170006. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0006. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
We introduce a parameter estimation framework for automatically and robustly personalizing aortic haemodynamic computations from four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging data. The framework is based on a reduced-order multiscale fluid-structure interaction blood flow model, and on two calibration procedures. First, Windkessel parameters of the outlet boundary conditions are personalized by solving a system of nonlinear equations. Second, the regional mechanical wall properties of the aorta are personalized by employing a nonlinear least-squares minimization method. The two calibration procedures are run sequentially and iteratively until both procedures have converged. The parameter estimation framework was successfully evaluated on 15 datasets from patients with aortic valve disease. On average, only 1.27 ± 0.96 and 7.07 ± 1.44 iterations were required to personalize the outlet boundary conditions and the regional mechanical wall properties, respectively. Overall, the computational model was in close agreement with the clinical measurements used as objectives (pressures, flow rates, cross-sectional areas), with a maximum error of less than 1%. Given its level of automation, robustness and the short execution time (6.2 ± 1.2 min on a standard hardware configuration), the framework is potentially well suited for a clinical setting.
我们介绍了一种参数估计框架,用于根据四维磁共振成像数据自动且稳健地实现主动脉血流动力学计算的个性化。该框架基于降阶多尺度流固耦合血流模型以及两种校准程序。首先,通过求解非线性方程组来实现出口边界条件的风箱参数个性化。其次,采用非线性最小二乘最小化方法来实现主动脉区域力学壁特性的个性化。这两种校准程序依次迭代运行,直到两者都收敛。该参数估计框架在15个主动脉瓣疾病患者的数据集上得到了成功评估。平均而言,分别只需1.27±0.96次和7.07±1.44次迭代就能实现出口边界条件和区域力学壁特性的个性化。总体而言,计算模型与用作目标的临床测量值(压力、流速、横截面积)高度吻合,最大误差小于1%。鉴于其自动化程度、稳健性以及较短的执行时间(在标准硬件配置下为6.2±1.2分钟),该框架可能非常适合临床应用。