Suppr超能文献

植物源、四价、类病毒样颗粒流感疫苗在成人(18-64 岁)和老年人(≥65 岁)中的有效性、免疫原性和安全性:两项多中心、随机、3 期临床试验。

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a plant-derived, quadrivalent, virus-like particle influenza vaccine in adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years): two multicentre, randomised phase 3 trials.

机构信息

Medicago, Quebec, QC, Canada; Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Medicago, Quebec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1491-1503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32014-6. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Seasonal influenza remains a substantial public health threat despite the availability of egg-derived and other vaccines. Plant-based manufacturing might address some of the limitations of current vaccines. We describe two phase 3 efficacy studies of a recombinant quadrivalent virus-like particle (QVLP) influenza vaccine manufactured in plants, one in adults aged 18-64 years (the 18-64 study) and one in older people aged 65 years and older (the 65-plus study).

METHODS

We did two randomised, observer-blind, multinational studies in the northern hemisphere in the 2017-18 (the 18-64 study) and 2018-19 (the 65-plus study) influenza seasons. The 18-64 study was done at 73 sites and the 65-plus study was done at 104 sites, both across Asia, Europe, and North America. In the 18-64 study, inclusion criteria were body-mass index less than 40 kg/m; age 18-64 years at screening visit; and good health. In the 65-plus study, inclusion criteria were body-mass index of maximum 35 kg/m; aged 65 years or older at screening visit; not living in a rehabilitation centre or care home; and no acute or evolving medical problems. Participants in the 18-64 study were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either QVLP vaccine (30 μg haemagglutinin per strain) or placebo. Participants in the 65-plus study were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive QVLP vaccine (30 μg haemagglutinin per strain) or quadrivalent inactivated vaccine (QIV; 15 μg haemagglutinin per strain). The primary outcome in the 18-64 study was absolute vaccine efficacy to prevent laboratory-confirmed, respiratory illness caused by antigenically matched influenza strains. The primary outcome in the 65-plus study was relative vaccine efficacy to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness caused by any influenza strain. The primary analyses were done in the per-protocol population and safety was assessed in all participants who received the assigned treatment. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (18-64 study NCT03301051; 65-plus study NCT03739112).

FINDINGS

In the 18-64 study, between Aug 30, 2017, and Jan 15, 2018, 10 160 participants were randomly assigned to receive either QVLP vaccine (5077 participants) or placebo (5083 participants). The per-protocol population consisted of 4814 participants in the QVLP group and 4812 in the placebo group. The study did not meet its primary endpoint of 70% absolute vaccine efficacy for the QVLP vaccine (35·1% [95% CI 17·9 to 48·7]) against respiratory illness caused by matched strains. 55 (1·1%) of 5064 participants in the QVLP group versus 51 (1·0%) of 5072 in the placebo group had a serious adverse event. Four (0·1%) and six [0·1%] participants had severe treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events. In the 65-plus study, between Sept 18, 2018, and Feb 22, 2019, 12 794 participants were randomly assigned to receive either QVLP vaccine (6396 participants) or QIV (6398 participants). The per-protocol population consisted of 5996 participants in the QVLP group and 6026 in the QIV group. The study met its primary non-inferiority endpoint with a relative vaccine efficacy of the QVLP vaccine for the prevention of influenza-like illness caused by any strain of 8·8% (-16·7 to 28·7). 263 (4·1%) of 6352 participants in the QVLP group versus 266 (4·2%) of 6366 in the QIV group had serious adverse events (one [<0·1%] vs two [<0·1%] were considered treatment-related); one (<0·1%) versus three (<0·1%) participants had severe treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

These efficacy studies are the first large-scale studies of any plant-derived human vaccine. Together, they show that the plant-derived QVLP vaccine can provide substantial protection against respiratory illness and influenza-like illness caused by influenza viruses in adults. QVLP vaccine was well tolerated and no major safety signal arose in participants who received QVLP vaccine across the two studies.

FUNDING

Medicago.

摘要

背景

尽管有源自鸡蛋的疫苗和其他疫苗可用,但季节性流感仍然是一个重大的公共卫生威胁。基于植物的制造方法可能会解决当前疫苗的一些局限性。我们描述了一种基于植物的重组四价病毒样颗粒(QVLP)流感疫苗的两项 3 期疗效研究,一项在 18-64 岁成年人中进行(18-64 岁研究),另一项在 65 岁及以上人群中进行(65 岁以上研究)。

方法

我们在北半球的 2017-18 年(18-64 岁研究)和 2018-19 年(65 岁以上研究)流感季节进行了两项随机、观察者盲、多国研究。18-64 岁研究在 73 个地点进行,65 岁以上研究在 104 个地点进行,地点遍布亚洲、欧洲和北美。在 18-64 岁研究中,纳入标准为体重指数(BMI)<40kg/m2;筛选时年龄为 18-64 岁;身体健康。在 65 岁以上的研究中,纳入标准为 BMI 最高为 35kg/m2;筛选时年龄为 65 岁或以上;不住在康复中心或养老院;没有急性或进展性的医疗问题。18-64 岁研究的参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受 QVLP 疫苗(每株 30μg 血凝素)或安慰剂。65 岁以上研究的参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受 QVLP 疫苗(每株 30μg 血凝素)或四价灭活疫苗(QIV;每株 15μg 血凝素)。18-64 岁研究的主要结局是预防抗原匹配的流感株引起的实验室确诊呼吸道疾病的绝对疫苗有效性。65 岁以上研究的主要结局是预防任何流感株引起的实验室确诊流感样疾病的相对疫苗有效性。主要分析在符合方案人群中进行,所有接受指定治疗的参与者的安全性均进行了评估。这些研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(18-64 岁研究 NCT03301051;65 岁以上研究 NCT03739112)。

结果

在 18-64 岁的研究中,2017 年 8 月 30 日至 2018 年 1 月 15 日,104160 名参与者被随机分配接受 QVLP 疫苗(5077 名参与者)或安慰剂(5083 名参与者)。符合方案人群包括 QVLP 组的 4814 名参与者和安慰剂组的 4812 名参与者。该研究未达到其主要终点,即 QVLP 疫苗对匹配株引起的呼吸道疾病的 70%绝对疫苗有效性(35.1%[95%CI 17.9%至 48.7%])。在 QVLP 组的 5064 名参与者中,有 55 名(1.1%)发生严重不良事件,而安慰剂组的 5072 名参与者中有 51 名(1.0%)发生严重不良事件。在 QVLP 组的 5064 名参与者中有 4 名(0.1%)和 6 名(0.1%)发生严重治疗相关不良事件。在 65 岁以上的研究中,2018 年 9 月 18 日至 2019 年 2 月 22 日,12794 名参与者被随机分配接受 QVLP 疫苗(6396 名参与者)或 QIV(6398 名参与者)。符合方案人群包括 QVLP 组的 5996 名参与者和 QIV 组的 6026 名参与者。该研究达到了预防任何流感株引起的流感样疾病的相对疫苗有效性的非劣效性主要终点,其疫苗有效性为 8.8%(-16.7%至 28.7%)。在 QVLP 组的 6352 名参与者中,有 263 名(4.1%)发生严重不良事件,而 QIV 组的 6366 名参与者中有 266 名(4.2%)发生严重不良事件(一个[<0.1%]与两个[<0.1%]被认为与治疗有关);一名[<0.1%]与三名[<0.1%]参与者发生严重治疗相关不良事件。

解释

这两项疗效研究是首次对任何植物源性人类疫苗进行的大规模研究。这两项研究都表明,基于植物的 QVLP 疫苗可以为成年人提供针对流感病毒引起的呼吸道疾病和流感样疾病的显著保护。QVLP 疫苗具有良好的耐受性,在两项研究中接受 QVLP 疫苗的参与者均未出现重大安全信号。

资助

Medicago。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验