Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, The Pennsylvania State University, 111A Armsby Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Independent Researcher, Khartoum, Sudan.
Demography. 2020 Dec;57(6):2113-2141. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00923-2.
Changes in fertility patterns are hypothesized to be among the many second-order consequences of armed conflict, but expectations about the direction of such effects are theoretically ambiguous. Prior research, from a range of contexts, has also yielded inconsistent results. We contribute to this debate by using harmonized data and methods to examine the effects of exposure to conflict on preferred and observed fertility outcomes across a spatially and temporally extensive population. We use high-resolution georeferenced data from 25 sub-Saharan African countries, combining records of violent events from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) with data on fertility goals and outcomes from the Demographic and Health Surveys (n = 368,765 women aged 15-49 years). We estimate a series of linear and logistic regression models to assess the effects of exposure to conflict events on ideal family size and the probability of childbearing within the 12 months prior to the interview. We find that, on average, exposure to armed conflict leads to modest reductions in both respondents' preferred family size and their probability of recent childbearing. Many of these effects are heterogeneous between demographic groups and across contexts, which suggests systematic differences in women's vulnerability or preferred responses to armed conflict. Additional analyses suggest that conflict-related fertility declines may be driven by delays or reductions in marriage. These results contribute new evidence about the demographic effects of conflict and their underlying mechanisms, and broadly underline the importance of studying the second-order effects of organized violence on vulnerable populations.
生育模式的变化被认为是武装冲突的众多二阶后果之一,但对于这种影响的方向的预期在理论上是模棱两可的。来自不同背景的先前研究也得出了不一致的结果。我们通过使用协调一致的数据和方法,来检验在一个空间和时间上广泛的人群中,接触冲突对偏好生育和实际生育结果的影响,从而为这场争论做出了贡献。我们使用来自 25 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的高分辨率地理参考数据,将武装冲突地点和事件数据项目(ACLED)的暴力事件记录与生育目标和结果数据(来自人口与健康调查(n = 368765 名年龄在 15-49 岁的妇女))结合起来。我们估计了一系列线性和逻辑回归模型,以评估接触冲突事件对理想家庭规模和受访者在接受采访前 12 个月内生育的概率的影响。我们发现,平均而言,接触武装冲突会导致受访者偏好的家庭规模和最近生育的概率适度减少。这些影响中的许多在人口群体之间和在不同的情况下是不同的,这表明妇女在脆弱性或对武装冲突的偏好反应方面存在系统性差异。进一步的分析表明,与冲突有关的生育率下降可能是由于婚姻的延迟或减少所致。这些结果为冲突对人口的影响及其潜在机制提供了新的证据,并广泛强调了研究有组织暴力对弱势群体的二阶影响的重要性。