Critical Care Echocardiography Service, Intermountain Medical Center, St, Murray, UT; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):1055-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.274. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
Sepsis is a frequently lethal state, commonly associated with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in sepsis is less well understood.
In septic patients, how common is RV dysfunction, and is it associated with worse outcomes?
We measured echocardiographic parameters on critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic shock within the first 24 hours of ICU admission. We defined RV dysfunction as fractional area change (FAC) less than 35% or tricuspid annulus systolic plane excursion (TAPSE) less than 1.6 cm. We defined LV systolic dysfunction as ejection fraction (EF) less than 45% or longitudinal strain greater than -19%. Using logistic regression, we assessed the relationship between 28-day mortality and presence of RV dysfunction and LV systolic dysfunction, controlling for receipt of vasopressors, receipt of fluid, mechanical ventilation, and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score.
We studied 393 patients. RV and LV dysfunction were common (48% and 63%, respectively). Mean echocardiographic values were: RV end-diastolic area, 22.4 ± 7.0 cm; RV end-systolic area, 14.2 ± 6.0 cm; RV FAC, 38 ± 11%; TAPSE, 1.8 ± .06 cm; RV longitudinal strain, -15.3 ± 6.5%; LV EF, 60% ± 14%; LV longitudinal strain, -16.5% ± 6.0%. Patients with RV dysfunction had higher 28-day mortality (31% vs 16%, P = .001). In our multivariable regression model, RV dysfunction was associated with increased mortality (OR, 3.4; CI, 1.7-6.8; P = .001), and LV systolic dysfunction was not (OR, 0.63; CI, 0.3 -1.2; P = .32) INTERPRETATION: Right ventricular dysfunction is present in nearly half of studied septic patients and is associated with over threefold higher 28-day mortality.
败血症是一种常见的致死性疾病,通常与左心室(LV)功能障碍有关。败血症患者的右心室(RV)功能障碍则了解较少。
在败血症患者中,RV 功能障碍的发生率有多高?它与预后不良有关吗?
我们在 ICU 入院后 24 小时内测量了重症脓毒症或感染性休克患者的超声心动图参数。我们将 RV 功能障碍定义为分数面积变化(FAC)小于 35%或三尖瓣环收缩期平面位移(TAPSE)小于 1.6cm。我们将 LV 收缩功能障碍定义为射血分数(EF)小于 45%或纵向应变大于-19%。使用逻辑回归,我们评估了 28 天死亡率与 RV 功能障碍和 LV 收缩功能障碍之间的关系,同时控制了血管加压素的使用、液体的使用、机械通气和急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE II)评分。
我们研究了 393 名患者。RV 和 LV 功能障碍很常见(分别为 48%和 63%)。平均超声心动图值为:RV 舒张末期面积,22.4±7.0cm;RV 收缩末期面积,14.2±6.0cm;RV FAC,38±11%;TAPSE,1.8±0.06cm;RV 纵向应变,-15.3±6.5%;LV EF,60%±14%;LV 纵向应变,-16.5%±6.0%。RV 功能障碍患者的 28 天死亡率较高(31%比 16%,P=0.001)。在我们的多变量回归模型中,RV 功能障碍与死亡率增加相关(OR,3.4;95%CI,1.7-6.8;P=0.001),而 LV 收缩功能障碍则没有(OR,0.63;95%CI,0.3-1.2;P=0.32)。
近一半的研究脓毒症患者存在 RV 功能障碍,与 28 天死亡率增加三倍以上有关。