Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Appetite. 2021 Mar 1;158:105008. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105008. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Orthorexia nervosa (ON) has in recent years attracted attention, but the scarcity of empirical research on the matter generates uncertainty about its progression. This study aims to gain insight into the developmental pathway of ON and factors contributing to it, to establish its etiology. In order to gain insights into health professionals' experience with patients that they identified as suffering from ON, this study adopted mixed methods, with a sequential exploratory design: first, semi-structured interviews (n = 10) were conducted; following, a questionnaire (n = 101) was administered online. Nutritionists, psychologists, psychotherapists, and support workers with experience in treating eating disorders in the Netherlands were the study's target group. Results shed light on environmental factors influencing the development of ON (e.g. pseudoscientific nutritional experts on social media), baseline risks (e.g. high level of education), initiating events (e.g. experiencing a break up), symptoms (e.g. feelings of depression and anxiety), diagnosis and type of treatment administered (e.g. cognitive-behavioral therapy). The current study is unique in its use of health professionals' experiential knowledge to assess how ON develops and who typically develops it. Furthermore, it contributes to the sparse literature on potential ways to treat ON. More top-down investigations into health professionals' experiences are encouraged as the literature on ON thickens.
近年来,饮食失调正被越来越多地关注,但是由于对其缺乏实证研究,导致人们对其发展过程存在很多不确定性。本研究旨在深入了解饮食失调的发展途径和促成因素,以确定其病因。为了深入了解健康专业人员对被他们认定为患有饮食失调症患者的经验,本研究采用了混合方法,即顺序探索性设计:首先进行了半结构化访谈(n=10);其次,在线进行了问卷调查(n=101)。荷兰有治疗饮食失调经验的营养师、心理学家、心理治疗师和支持工作者是本研究的目标群体。研究结果揭示了影响饮食失调发展的环境因素(例如社交媒体上的伪科学营养专家)、基线风险(例如,高教育水平)、引发事件(例如,经历分手)、症状(例如,抑郁和焦虑感)、诊断和治疗类型(例如,认知行为疗法)。本研究的独特之处在于利用健康专业人员的经验知识来评估饮食失调是如何发展的,以及哪些人通常会患上饮食失调。此外,本研究还为治疗饮食失调症的潜在方法提供了少量文献参考。随着饮食失调症文献的增多,鼓励对健康专业人员的经验进行更多自上而下的调查。