Suppr超能文献

超越隐私与健康:荷兰接触者追踪应用程序辩论的正当性分析

Beyond privacy vs. health: a justification analysis of the contact-tracing apps debate in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Siffels Lotje Elizabeth

机构信息

Faculteit Filosofie, Theologie en Religiestudies, Radboud Universiteit, Erasmusplein 1, Postbus 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09555-x. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

Abstract

In the Netherlands, as in many other nations, the government has proposed the use of a contact-tracing app as a means of helping to contain the spread of the corona virus. The discussion about the use of such an app has mostly been framed in terms of a tradeoff between privacy and public health. This research statement presents an analysis of the Dutch public debate on Corona-apps by using the framework of Orders of Worth by Boltanski and Thévenot (1991). It argues that this framework can help us to move beyond the dichotomy of privacy vs. public health by recognizing a plurality of conceptions of the common good in the debate about contact-tracing apps. This statement presents six orders of worth present in the Dutch debate: and and argues that the identification of which common goods are at stake will contribute to discussions about the use of this technology from a standpoint with a richer ethical perspective.

摘要

在荷兰,与许多其他国家一样,政府提议使用一款接触者追踪应用程序,作为帮助遏制新冠病毒传播的一种手段。关于使用此类应用程序的讨论大多围绕隐私与公共卫生之间的权衡展开。本研究声明通过运用博尔坦斯基和泰弗诺(1991年)提出的价值秩序框架,对荷兰关于新冠应用程序的公众辩论进行了分析。它认为,这一框架能够帮助我们超越隐私与公共卫生的二分法,通过在关于接触者追踪应用程序的辩论中认识到多种共同利益观念。本声明呈现了荷兰辩论中存在的六种价值秩序,并认为确定哪些共同利益受到影响,将有助于从更丰富的伦理视角出发,就这项技术的使用展开讨论。

相似文献

4
[On the ethics of corona apps].[论新冠应用程序的伦理问题]
Ethik Med. 2021;33(3):387-400. doi: 10.1007/s00481-021-00629-y. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验