• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有什么新情况?在话语中,手势伴随的是可推断的指称对象,而非全新的指称对象。

What's New? Gestures Accompany Inferable Rather Than Brand-New Referents in Discourse.

作者信息

Debreslioska Sandra, Gullberg Marianne

机构信息

Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Lund University Humanities Lab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 23;11:1935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01935. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01935
PMID:33071835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7539624/
Abstract

The literature on bimodal discourse reference has shown that gestures are sensitive to referents' information status in discourse. Gestures occur more often with new referents/first mentions than with given referents/subsequent mentions. However, because not all new entities at first mention occur with gestures, the current study examines whether gestures are sensitive to a difference in information status between brand-new and inferable entities and variation in nominal definiteness. Unexpectedly, the results show that gestures are more frequent with inferable referents (hearer new but discourse old) than with brand-new referents (hearer new and discourse new). The findings reveal new aspects of the relationship between gestures and speech in discourse, specifically suggesting a complementary (disambiguating) function for gestures in the context of first mentioned discourse entities. The results thus highlight the multi-functionality of gestures in relation to speech.

摘要

关于双峰话语指称的文献表明,手势对话语中指称对象的信息状态很敏感。与已知指称对象/后续提及相比,手势在新指称对象/首次提及中出现得更频繁。然而,由于并非所有首次提及的新实体都会伴随着手势出现,因此本研究考察了手势是否对话语中全新实体和可推断实体之间的信息状态差异以及名词确定性的变化敏感。出乎意料的是,结果表明,与全新指称对象(听者新且话语新)相比,手势在可推断指称对象(听者新但话语旧)中出现得更频繁。这些发现揭示了话语中手势与言语关系的新方面,具体表明了手势在首次提及的话语实体背景下具有补充(消除歧义)功能。因此,这些结果突出了手势相对于言语的多功能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/847e13c79856/fpsyg-11-01935-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/d93b6ce0a7ff/fpsyg-11-01935-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/9983593091bb/fpsyg-11-01935-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/801da5a9174c/fpsyg-11-01935-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/0a5c8c08afdb/fpsyg-11-01935-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/0d964a835e06/fpsyg-11-01935-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/9f86082a5ea4/fpsyg-11-01935-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/90e22174ccfd/fpsyg-11-01935-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/0bffcf124a78/fpsyg-11-01935-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/847e13c79856/fpsyg-11-01935-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/d93b6ce0a7ff/fpsyg-11-01935-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/9983593091bb/fpsyg-11-01935-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/801da5a9174c/fpsyg-11-01935-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/0a5c8c08afdb/fpsyg-11-01935-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/0d964a835e06/fpsyg-11-01935-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/9f86082a5ea4/fpsyg-11-01935-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/90e22174ccfd/fpsyg-11-01935-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/0bffcf124a78/fpsyg-11-01935-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa0/7539624/847e13c79856/fpsyg-11-01935-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
What's New? Gestures Accompany Inferable Rather Than Brand-New Referents in Discourse.有什么新情况?在话语中,手势伴随的是可推断的指称对象,而非全新的指称对象。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 23;11:1935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01935. eCollection 2020.
2
"What is this?" Gesture as a potential cue to identify referents in discourse.“这是什么?”手势作为话语中识别所指对象的潜在线索。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2012 Apr 1;33(2):329-342. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000373.
3
When speech is ambiguous gesture steps in: Sensitivity to discourse-pragmatic principles in early childhood.当言语含糊不清时,手势就会介入:幼儿期对话语语用原则的敏感性。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2010 Jan 1;31(1):209-224. doi: 10.1017/S0142716409990221.
4
Children Use Non-referential Gestures in Narrative Speech to Mark Discourse Elements Which Update Common Ground.儿童在叙事性言语中使用非指称性手势来标记更新共同背景的话语元素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 11;12:661339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661339. eCollection 2021.
5
Addressees Are Sensitive to the Presence of Gesture When Tracking a Single Referent in Discourse.在语篇中追踪单一指称对象时,听话者对手势的存在很敏感。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 13;10:1775. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01775. eCollection 2019.
6
Visible cohesion: a comparison of reference tracking in sign, speech, and co-speech gesture.可见衔接:手语、言语和伴随言语手势中参照追踪的比较
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;7(1):36-60. doi: 10.1111/tops.12122. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
When do speakers use gestures to specify who does what to whom? The role of language proficiency and type of gestures in narratives.说话者何时会使用手势来明确谁对谁做了什么?语言能力和手势类型在叙事中的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Dec;42(6):581-94. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9230-6.
8
Who Did What to Whom? Children Track Story Referents First in Gesture.谁对谁做了什么?儿童在手势中首先追踪故事所指对象。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Aug;46(4):1019-1032. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9476-0.
9
Iconic Gestures Facilitate Discourse Comprehension in Individuals With Superior Immediate Memory for Body Configurations.标志性手势有助于身体构型即时记忆能力较强的个体进行话语理解。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;26(11):1717-27. doi: 10.1177/0956797615597671. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
10
Referential interactions of Turkish-learning children with their caregivers about non-absent objects: integration of non-verbal devices and prior discourse.学习土耳其语的儿童与照顾者就非缺失物体进行的指称互动:非语言手段与先前话语的整合
J Child Lang. 2018 Jan;45(1):148-173. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000150. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Children Use Non-referential Gestures in Narrative Speech to Mark Discourse Elements Which Update Common Ground.儿童在叙事性言语中使用非指称性手势来标记更新共同背景的话语元素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 11;12:661339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661339. eCollection 2021.
2
Emerging ASL Distinctions in Sign-Speech Bilinguals' Signs and Co-speech Gestures in Placement Descriptions.手语-口语双语者在位置描述中手势和伴随言语手势方面新出现的美国手语差异
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 3;12:686485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686485. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-thought and co-speech gestures are generated by the same action generation process.共同思考和共同言语手势由相同的动作生成过程产生。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):257-70. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000168. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
2
Visible cohesion: a comparison of reference tracking in sign, speech, and co-speech gesture.可见衔接:手语、言语和伴随言语手势中参照追踪的比较
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;7(1):36-60. doi: 10.1111/tops.12122. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
3
When speech is ambiguous gesture steps in: Sensitivity to discourse-pragmatic principles in early childhood.
当言语含糊不清时,手势就会介入:幼儿期对话语语用原则的敏感性。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2010 Jan 1;31(1):209-224. doi: 10.1017/S0142716409990221.
4
Cohesion and anaphora in children's narratives: a comparison of English, French German, and Mandarin Chinese.儿童叙事中的衔接与指代:英语、法语、德语和汉语的比较
J Child Lang. 1999 Jun;26(2):419-52. doi: 10.1017/s0305000999003785.
5
The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction.变色龙效应:感知与行为的联系及社会互动
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;76(6):893-910. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.893.