Chen Ying, Kim Eric S, Shields Alexandra E, VanderWeele Tyler J
Human Flourishing Program, Harvard Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Cogent Psychol. 2020;7(1). doi: 10.1080/23311908.2020.1825043. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
Potential antecedents to having a sense of purpose in life remain understudied. As researchers begin contemplating purpose as a promising target of public health intervention, it is critical to identify its antecedents. Using prospective data from the Nurses' Health Study II (2009-2016; N ranged from 3,905 to 4,189), this study evaluated a wide range of potential antecedents of purpose, including: psychosocial well-being, psychological distress, employment characteristics, lifestyle, and physical health factors. In separate regression models we regressed purpose in life on each candidate antecedent. In each model, we adjusted for the prior value of purpose, prior values of all exposure variables, and various other covariates simultaneously. Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple testing. The results suggested that positive affect and the number of close relatives were each associated with higher purpose (e.g., β=0.14, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.17 for positive affect). Several psychological distress indicators were inversely associated with purpose, including depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, loneliness, and hopelessness (e.g., β=-0.16, 95% CI: -0.19, -0.13 for depressive symptoms). There was also some evidence suggesting that fewer close friends, living alone, and unemployment/retirement were associated with lower purpose. There was, however, little evidence that health behaviors or physical health were associated with subsequent purpose. This study extends the literature by providing longitudinal evidence with rigorous analytic methodologies, and by considering a wide range of potential antecedents of purpose including some that have seldom been examined previously.
生活目标感的潜在影响因素仍未得到充分研究。随着研究人员开始将目标视为公共卫生干预的一个有前景的靶点,确定其影响因素至关重要。本研究利用护士健康研究II(2009 - 2016年;样本量N从3905到4189不等)的前瞻性数据,评估了一系列广泛的目标潜在影响因素,包括:心理社会幸福感、心理困扰、就业特征、生活方式和身体健康因素。在单独的回归模型中,我们将生活目标分别对每个候选影响因素进行回归分析。在每个模型中,我们同时对目标的先前值、所有暴露变量的先前值以及各种其他协变量进行了调整。采用Bonferroni校正来校正多重检验。结果表明,积极情绪和亲密亲属的数量均与更高的目标感相关(例如,积极情绪的β = 0.14,95%置信区间:0.11,0.17)。几个心理困扰指标与目标感呈负相关,包括抑郁症状、焦虑症状、孤独感和绝望感(例如,抑郁症状的β = -0.16,95%置信区间:-0.19,-0.13)。也有一些证据表明,亲密朋友较少、独居以及失业/退休与较低的目标感相关。然而,几乎没有证据表明健康行为或身体健康与随后的目标感相关。本研究通过提供具有严格分析方法的纵向证据,并考虑了广泛的目标潜在影响因素,包括一些以前很少研究的因素,扩展了相关文献。