• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别敏感的公共卫生研究:对荷兰一研究所研究提案的分析。

Sex- and gender-sensitive public health research: an analysis of research proposals in a research institute in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC-VUmc, Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Women Health. 2021 Jan;61(1):109-119. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1834056. Epub 2020 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1080/03630242.2020.1834056
PMID:33073744
Abstract

Taking sex and gender into account in public health research is essential to optimize methodological procedures, bridge the gender gap in public health knowledge, and advance gender equality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of sex and gender considerations in public health research proposals in a Dutch research institute. We screened a random sample of 38 proposals submitted for review to the institute's science committee between 2011 and 2016. Using the Canadian Institutes of Health Research' Gender and Health Institute criteria for gender-sensitive research and qualitative content analysis, we assessed if, and how sex and gender were considered throughout the proposals (background, research aim, design, data collection, and analysis). Our results show that in general, both sex and gender were poorly considered. Gender was insufficiently taken into account throughout most proposals. When sex was mentioned in a proposal, its consideration was often inconsistent and fragmented. Finally, we identified common methodological pitfalls. We recommend that public health curricula and funding bodies increase their focus on implementing sex and gender in public health research, for instance through quality criteria, training programs for researchers and reviewers, and capacity building initiatives.

摘要

在公共卫生研究中考虑性别因素对于优化方法程序、弥合公共卫生知识中的性别差距以及推进性别平等至关重要。本研究旨在评估荷兰某研究所提交给科学委员会评审的 38 项研究提案中当前性别因素的考虑情况。我们对 2011 年至 2016 年期间提交的提案进行了随机抽样筛选。使用加拿大卫生研究院性别与健康研究所的性别敏感研究标准和定性内容分析方法,评估了提案的背景、研究目标、设计、数据收集和分析等各个方面是否以及如何考虑了性别因素。结果表明,总体而言,提案对性别因素的考虑都不够充分。大多数提案中都没有充分考虑性别因素。当提案中提到性别的时候,对性别的考虑往往是不一致和零散的。最后,我们还确定了一些常见的方法学陷阱。我们建议公共卫生课程和资助机构更加注重在公共卫生研究中实施性别因素,例如通过质量标准、研究人员和评审员培训计划以及能力建设举措。

相似文献

1
Sex- and gender-sensitive public health research: an analysis of research proposals in a research institute in the Netherlands.性别敏感的公共卫生研究:对荷兰一研究所研究提案的分析。
Women Health. 2021 Jan;61(1):109-119. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1834056. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
2
Essential metrics for assessing sex & gender integration in health research proposals involving human participants.评估涉及人类受试者的健康研究提案中性别与性取向整合情况的关键指标。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0182812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182812. eCollection 2017.
3
Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis.基于研究内容领域的加拿大卫生研究院资助和人员奖项资助率的性别差异:一项回顾性分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 15;16(10):e1002935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002935. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
[Research proposals submitted to the Dutch Investigative Medicine Fund; evaluation of the scientific quality by the Council for Scientific Research (NWO)].提交给荷兰调查医学基金的研究提案;由科学研究理事会(NWO)对科学质量进行评估
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Jan 6;145(1):37-40.
5
Commentary on the new sex and gender editorial policy of the Canadian Journal of Public Health.《加拿大公共卫生杂志》新的性别与性取向编辑政策述评
Can J Public Health. 2016 Aug 15;107(2):e140-e141. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5584.
6
Sex and gender analysis in knowledge translation interventions: challenges and solutions.知识转化干预中的性别分析:挑战与解决方案
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Sep 23;18(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00625-6.
7
[Taking into consideration gender and sex. New chances to improve the quality of epidemiological and health research].[考虑性别因素。提高流行病学和健康研究质量的新机遇]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Mar;48(3):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0993-2.
8
Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals.在线学习对提高健康研究人员在资助申请中适当纳入性别(或两者)的能力的效果。
Biol Sex Differ. 2018 Aug 29;9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13293-018-0197-3.
9
Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact?与性别整合相关的健康研究资金政策的变化会产生影响吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 25;9(6):e99900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099900. eCollection 2014.
10
The quality of gender and sex integration in scientific articles resulting from health research funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Health 2004-2016.2004 - 2016年巴西卫生部资助的健康研究产生的科学文章中性别与性别的整合质量。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023 Feb 27:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10389-023-01844-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Multifarious approaches of implementation to transfer gender sensitivity in health care practice: a scoping review.在医疗保健实践中传递性别敏感性的多种实施方法:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun 28;25(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13032-w.
2
Gender sensitivity of the COVID-19 mental health research in Europe: a scoping review.欧洲 COVID-19 心理健康研究的性别敏感性:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 10;23(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02286-1.
3
The Importance of Gender-Sensitive Health Care in the Context of Pain, Emergency and Vaccination: A Narrative Review.
疼痛、急诊与疫苗接种背景下性别敏感型医疗保健的重要性:一项叙述性综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;21(1):13. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010013.
4
The sex and gender dimensions of COVID-19: A narrative review of the potential underlying factors.COVID-19 的性别和性维度:潜在因素的叙述性综述。
Infect Genet Evol. 2022 Sep;103:105338. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105338. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
5
A 10-year longitudinal evaluation of science policy interventions to promote sex and gender in health research.一项关于促进健康研究中的性别因素的科学政策干预措施的十年纵向评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jun 15;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00741-x.