Suppr超能文献

对晚期癌症患者谵妄的现象学研究:探索性结构方程建模和潜在剖面分析。

Phenomenological examinations of delirium in advanced cancer patients: exploratory structural equation modelling and latent profile analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 19;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00668-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined phenomenological manifestations of delirium in advanced cancer patients by examining the factor structure of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) and profiles of delirium symptoms.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients with advanced cancer admitted to inpatient palliative care units in South Korea were examined by psychiatrists using the DRS-R-98 and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). The factor structure of the DRS-R-98 was examined by exploratory structural equation modelling analysis (ESEM) and profiles of delirium were examined by latent profile analysis (LPA).

RESULTS

CAM-defined delirium was present in 66.6% (n = 62) of patients. Results from the ESEM analysis confirmed applicability of the core and noncore symptom factors of the DRS-R-98 to advanced cancer patients. LPA identified three distinct profiles of delirium characterizing the overall severity of delirium and its core and noncore symptoms. Class 1 (n = 55, 59.1%) showed low levels of all delirium symptoms. Class 2 (n = 17, 18.3%) showed high levels of core symptoms only, whereas Class 3 (n = 21, 22.6%) showed high levels of both core and noncore symptoms except motor retardation.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical care for delirium in advanced cancer patients may benefit from consideration of the core and noncore symptom factor structure and the three distinct phenomenological profiles of delirium observed in the present study.

摘要

背景

本研究通过考察修订版 Delirium Rating Scale-98(DRS-R-98)的因子结构和谵妄症状特征,来研究晚期癌症患者谵妄的现象学表现。

方法

韩国姑息治疗住院病房的 93 名晚期癌症患者由精神科医生使用 DRS-R-98 和意识模糊评估法(CAM)进行评估。采用探索性结构方程模型分析(ESEM)考察 DRS-R-98 的因子结构,采用潜在剖面分析(LPA)考察谵妄的特征。

结果

CAM 定义的谵妄存在于 66.6%(n=62)的患者中。ESEM 分析结果证实了 DRS-R-98 的核心和非核心症状因子适用于晚期癌症患者。LPA 确定了谵妄的三个不同特征群,可描述谵妄的总体严重程度及其核心和非核心症状。第 1 类(n=55,59.1%)所有谵妄症状水平较低。第 2 类(n=17,18.3%)仅表现出核心症状水平高,而第 3 类(n=21,22.6%)除了运动迟缓外,核心和非核心症状水平均较高。

结论

对于晚期癌症患者的谵妄临床护理,可能需要考虑本研究中观察到的核心和非核心症状因子结构以及谵妄的三种不同表现特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d09a/7574192/6aae837abce9/12904_2020_668_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验