• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证减少阿联酋国民复发性心血管疾病的动脉粥样硬化血栓形成(REACH)预测模型。

Validation of the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) prediction model for recurrent cardiovascular disease among United Arab Emirates Nationals.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 17666, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2020 Oct 19;13(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05331-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-020-05331-8
PMID:33076967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7574310/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Prediction models assist health-care providers in making patient care decisions. This study aimed to externally validate the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) prediction model for recurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD) among the Emirati nationals.

RESULTS

There are 204 patients with established CVD, attending Tawam Hospital from April 1, 2008. The data retrieved from electronic medical records for these patients were used to externally validate the REACH prediction model. Baseline results showed the following: 77.0% were men, 69.6% were diagnosed with coronary artery disease, and 87.3% have a single vascular bed involvement. The risk prediction model for cardiovascular mortality performed moderately well [C-statistic 0.74 (standard error 0.11)] in identifying those at high risk for cardiovascular death, whereas for recurrent CVD events, it performed poorly in predicting the next CVD event [C-statistic 0.63 (standard error 0.06)], over a 20-month follow-up. The calibration curve showed poor agreement indicating that the REACH model underestimated both recurrent CVD risk and cardiovascular death. With recalibration, the REACH cardiovascular death prediction model could potentially be used to identify patients who would benefit from aggressive risk reduction.

摘要

目的

预测模型有助于医疗保健提供者做出患者护理决策。本研究旨在对阿联酋国民复发性心血管疾病(CVD)的 REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health(REACH)预测模型进行外部验证。

结果

共有 204 名确诊 CVD 的患者于 2008 年 4 月 1 日在 Tawam 医院就诊。从这些患者的电子病历中检索数据,用于外部验证 REACH 预测模型。基线结果显示:77.0%为男性,69.6%被诊断为冠心病,87.3%单血管床受累。心血管死亡率风险预测模型在识别心血管死亡高危患者方面表现中等[C 统计量 0.74(标准误差 0.11)],而对于复发性 CVD 事件,在预测下一次 CVD 事件方面表现不佳[C 统计量 0.63(标准误差 0.06)],随访 20 个月。校准曲线显示一致性差,表明 REACH 模型低估了复发性 CVD 风险和心血管死亡风险。通过重新校准,REACH 心血管死亡预测模型可能有助于识别需要积极降低风险的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7365/7574310/f9bd83d7c194/13104_2020_5331_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7365/7574310/72d41a2eb76d/13104_2020_5331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7365/7574310/f9bd83d7c194/13104_2020_5331_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7365/7574310/72d41a2eb76d/13104_2020_5331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7365/7574310/f9bd83d7c194/13104_2020_5331_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) prediction model for recurrent cardiovascular disease among United Arab Emirates Nationals.验证减少阿联酋国民复发性心血管疾病的动脉粥样硬化血栓形成(REACH)预测模型。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Oct 19;13(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05331-8.
2
External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.在阿联酋人群中对三种常用心血管风险预测评分进行外部验证和临床实用性评估:一项回顾性纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e040680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680.
3
Development and validation of a novel 10-year cardiovascular risk prediction nomogram for the United Arab Emirates national population.开发和验证一种适用于阿联酋国民的新型 10 年心血管风险预测列线图。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 29;12(12):e064502. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064502.
4
Performance of the Framingham coronary heart disease risk score for predicting 10-year cardiac risk in adult United Arab Emirates nationals without diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.弗拉明汉冠心病风险评分在预测无糖尿病的阿联酋成年国民 10 年心脏风险中的表现:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Aug 26;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01246-2.
5
Incidence and risk factors for recurrent cardiovascular disease in middle-eastern adults: a retrospective study.中东成年人复发性心血管疾病的发生率和危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1231-z.
6
Predicting 10-year risk of recurrent cardiovascular events andcardiovascular interventions in patients with established cardiovascular disease: results from UCC-SMART and REACH.预测有明确心血管疾病患者的 10 年心血管事件和心血管干预复发风险:UCC-SMART 和 REACH 的研究结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 15;325:140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.053. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
7
Agreement between cardiovascular disease risk assessment tools: An application to the United Arab Emirates population.心血管疾病风险评估工具的一致性:在阿联酋人群中的应用。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0228031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228031. eCollection 2020.
8
9
The Veterans Affairs Cardiac Risk Score: Recalibrating the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Score for Applied Use.退伍军人事务部心脏风险评分:重新校准用于实际应用的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病评分。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55(9):864-870. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000781.
10
Chronic kidney disease in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease in the United Arab Emirates: A population-based study.阿联酋心血管疾病高危患者的慢性肾脏病:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 27;13(6):e0199920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199920. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of ACC/AHA Versus ESC/EAS LDL-C Recommendations for Residual Risk Reduction in ASCVD: A Simulation Study From DA VINCI.ACC/AHA 与 ESC/EAS LDL-C 推荐对 ASCVD 残余风险降低的影响:来自 DAVINCI 的模拟研究。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Oct;37(5):941-953. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07343-x. Epub 2022 May 14.
2
Risk Prediction of Cardiovascular Events by Exploration of Molecular Data with Explainable Artificial Intelligence.利用可解释人工智能探索分子数据预测心血管事件风险。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 24;22(19):10291. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910291.

本文引用的文献

1
External validation of a dynamic prediction model for repeated predictions of natural conception over time.动态预测模型对随时间重复预测自然受孕的外部验证。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2268-2275. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey317.
2
Framework for Using Risk Stratification to Improve Clinical Preventive Service Guidelines.风险分层在改善临床预防服务指南中的应用框架。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1S1):S26-S37. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.023.
3
Residual Risk Factors to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus.
有和无糖尿病的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者预测主要不良心血管事件的残余风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 23;7(1):9179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08741-0.
4
Distribution of Estimated 10-Year Risk of Recurrent Vascular Events and Residual Risk in a Secondary Prevention Population.预估复发性血管事件 10 年风险的分布和二级预防人群中的残余风险。
Circulation. 2016 Nov 8;134(19):1419-1429. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021314. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Assessing Discriminative Performance at External Validation of Clinical Prediction Models.评估临床预测模型外部验证时的判别性能。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 16;11(2):e0148820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148820. eCollection 2016.
6
Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study.多变量预后模型外部验证的样本量考量:一项重抽样研究
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 30;35(2):214-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.6787. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models.一种增强临床预测模型外部验证研究解释的新框架。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;68(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
8
Validity of cardiovascular risk prediction models in kidney transplant recipients.肾移植受者心血管风险预测模型的有效性
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:750579. doi: 10.1155/2014/750579. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
9
Correcting for optimistic prediction in small data sets.在小数据集上纠正乐观预测。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug 1;180(3):318-24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu140. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
10
External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods.Cox 预后模型的外部验证:原则与方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 6;13:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-33.