Muttalib Fiona, Tillmann Bourke, Ernst Genevieve, Murthy Srinivas, Bhutta Zulfiqar, Hansen Bettina, Adhikari Neill K J
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2450647. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.50647.
Care in a pediatric (vs adult) trauma center improves outcomes for injured children aged 0 to 12 years, but whether pediatric care benefits injured adolescents is unclear.
To evaluate the association of pediatric vs adult trauma center care with mortality among severely injured adolescents.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2020, among adolescents aged 12 to 16 years who were admitted to level I or level II adult trauma centers or a level I pediatric trauma center in British Columbia, Canada. Analysis was conducted between January and September 2024.
Admission to a level I pediatric trauma center or level I or level II adult trauma center.
The primary outcome was hospital mortality for the index trauma incident. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate the association of admission to a pediatric trauma center with mortality.
A total of 416 patients aged 12 to 16 years (median [IQR] age, 15 [13-16] years; 308 male [74.0%]) were admitted to a level I or level II trauma center with severe injury (201 [48.6%] at a pediatric trauma center; 83 [20.0%] at a level I adult trauma center; and 132 [31.7%] at a level II adult trauma center). Patients admitted to the pediatric trauma center (vs level I or level II adult centers) had lower median (IQR) age (14 [13-15] years vs 15 [14-16] years), higher median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (16 [9-21] vs 13 [9-18]) and fewer penetrating injuries (10 injuries [5.0%] vs 28 injuries [13.0%]). Hospital mortality was 7.0% (14 of 201 patients) among patients admitted to the pediatric center vs 4.2% (9 of 215 patients) among those admitted to an adult trauma center. There was no statistically significant difference in hospital mortality between patients admitted to pediatric vs adult trauma centers (adjusted odds ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 0.88-7.69; P = .08).
In this cohort study of severely injured adolescents, pediatric trauma center admission was not associated with improved hospital mortality. These findings suggest that severely injured adolescents aged 12 to 16 years may be safely treated at either adult or pediatric trauma centers.
在儿科(相对于成人)创伤中心接受治疗可改善0至12岁受伤儿童的治疗结果,但儿科治疗对受伤青少年是否有益尚不清楚。
评估儿科与成人创伤中心治疗与严重受伤青少年死亡率之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究于2012年4月1日至2020年3月31日期间,在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省被收治于一级或二级成人创伤中心或一级儿科创伤中心的12至16岁青少年中进行。分析于2024年1月至9月进行。
收治于一级儿科创伤中心或一级或二级成人创伤中心。
主要结局是首次创伤事件后的医院死亡率。采用治疗权重的逆概率来估计收治于儿科创伤中心与死亡率之间的关联。
共有416例12至16岁患者(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为15[13 - 16]岁;308例男性[74.0%])因重伤被收治于一级或二级创伤中心(201例[48.6%]在儿科创伤中心;83例[20.0%]在一级成人创伤中心;132例[31.7%]在二级成人创伤中心)。收治于儿科创伤中心的患者(相对于一级或二级成人中心)年龄中位数(四分位间距)较低(14[13 - 15]岁对15[14 - 16]岁),损伤严重程度评分中位数(四分位间距)较高(16[9 - 21]对13[9 - 18]),穿透伤较少(10例[5.0%]对28例[13.0%])。儿科中心收治患者的医院死亡率为7.0%(201例患者中的14例),而成人创伤中心收治患者的死亡率为4.2%(215例患者中的9例)。收治于儿科与成人创伤中心的患者在医院死亡率上无统计学显著差异(调整后的优势比为2.61;95%置信区间为0.88 - 7.69;P = 0.08)。
在这项针对严重受伤青少年的队列研究中,收治于儿科创伤中心与改善医院死亡率无关。这些发现表明,12至16岁的严重受伤青少年在成人或儿科创伤中心接受治疗可能都是安全的。