School of Mathematics, University of Nairobi College of Biological and Physical Sciences, Nairobi, Kenya
Health Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):e035045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035045.
To identify and appraise the methodological rigour of multivariable prognostic models predicting in-hospital paediatric mortality in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Systematic review of peer-reviewed journals.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Web of Science electronic databases since inception to August 2019.
We included model development studies predicting in-hospital paediatric mortality in LMIC.
This systematic review followed the Checklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies framework. The risk of bias assessment was conducted using Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). No quantitative summary was conducted due to substantial heterogeneity that was observed after assessing the studies included.
Our search strategy identified a total of 4054 unique articles. Among these, 3545 articles were excluded after review of titles and abstracts as they covered non-relevant topics. Full texts of 509 articles were screened for eligibility, of which 15 studies reporting 21 models met the eligibility criteria. Based on the PROBAST tool, risk of bias was assessed in four domains; participant, predictors, outcome and analyses. The domain of statistical analyses was the main area of concern where none of the included models was judged to be of low risk of bias.
This review identified 21 models predicting in-hospital paediatric mortality in LMIC. However, most reports characterising these models are of poor quality when judged against recent reporting standards due to a high risk of bias. Future studies should adhere to standardised methodological criteria and progress from identifying new risk scores to validating or adapting existing scores.
CRD42018088599.
识别和评价预测中低收入国家(LMICs)院内儿科死亡率的多变量预后模型的方法学严谨性。
对同行评议期刊进行系统评价。
从建库至 2019 年 8 月,检索 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Google Scholar 和 Web of Science 电子数据库。
纳入预测 LMIC 院内儿科死亡率的模型开发研究。
本系统评价遵循预测模型系统评价关键评估和数据提取清单框架。使用预测模型风险偏倚评估工具(PROBAST)进行风险偏倚评估。由于观察到纳入的研究存在很大的异质性,因此未进行定量总结。
我们的搜索策略共确定了 4054 篇独特的文章。其中,3545 篇文章在审查标题和摘要后被排除,因为它们涵盖了不相关的主题。对 509 篇文章的全文进行了筛选,以确定其是否符合纳入标准,其中 15 项研究报告了 21 项符合纳入标准的模型。根据 PROBAST 工具,风险偏倚在四个领域进行评估:参与者、预测因子、结局和分析。分析领域是关注的主要领域,纳入的模型中没有一个被认为具有低风险偏倚。
本研究共识别出 21 项预测 LMIC 院内儿科死亡率的模型。然而,由于存在高偏倚风险,与最近的报告标准相比,这些模型的大多数报告特征质量较差。未来的研究应遵循标准化的方法学标准,从确定新的风险评分进展到验证或改编现有的评分。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018088599。