• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助无夹闭筋膜内神经血管束保留前列腺癌根治术:手术技术及一年的功能和肿瘤学结果。

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, 14068, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 19;10(1):17595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74513-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-74513-y
PMID:33077779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7573617/
Abstract

Various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques have been introduced to maximize recovery of erectile function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing technique aims to preserve periprostatic structures and neurovascular bundles as much as possible by avoiding clipping of the vascular pedicles. This study reports 1-year functional and oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications in 105 patients with intact preoperative erectile function who underwent a modified clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing RARP. Intact erectile function was defined as score ≥ 21 on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men questionnaire or ability to have sexual intercourse. Median follow-up was 26.5 months (IQR 15.25-48). Postoperative erectile function recovery rates were 71.4%, 81.9%, 88.6%, 92.4%, and 94.3% at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. The rate of positive surgical margins was 16.2% overall and 11.8% in patients with stage pT2 disease. The biochemical recurrence rate was 6.7% overall. The modified clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing technique is safe and feasible and can achieve excellent recovery of erectile function after RARP. Further large-scale prospective comparative studies are warranted.

摘要

各种保留神经血管束的技术已被引入,以最大限度地恢复机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后的勃起功能。无夹结扎筋膜内神经血管束保留技术旨在通过避免血管蒂夹闭来尽可能保留前列腺周围结构和神经血管束。本研究报告了 105 例术前勃起功能完整的患者接受改良无夹结扎筋膜内神经血管束保留 RARP 的 1 年功能和肿瘤学结果以及术后并发症。完整的勃起功能定义为男性性健康问卷(SHIM)评分≥21 分或有性交能力。中位随访时间为 26.5 个月(IQR15.25-48)。术后 1、3、6、9 和 12 个月勃起功能恢复率分别为 71.4%、81.9%、88.6%、92.4%和 94.3%。总的切缘阳性率为 16.2%,pT2 期患者为 11.8%。总的生化复发率为 6.7%。改良无夹结扎筋膜内神经血管束保留技术是安全可行的,可实现 RARP 后勃起功能的良好恢复。需要进一步进行大规模前瞻性对比研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/7573617/b8aee152a443/41598_2020_74513_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/7573617/3fc15fc288a6/41598_2020_74513_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/7573617/6646fb84e51e/41598_2020_74513_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/7573617/b8aee152a443/41598_2020_74513_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/7573617/3fc15fc288a6/41598_2020_74513_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/7573617/6646fb84e51e/41598_2020_74513_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/7573617/b8aee152a443/41598_2020_74513_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.机器人辅助无夹闭筋膜内神经血管束保留前列腺癌根治术:手术技术及一年的功能和肿瘤学结果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 19;10(1):17595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74513-y.
2
Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.经腹腔镜前列腺切除术机器人开放试验:开放耻骨后和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的勃起功能和肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):618-627. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
3
Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留背静脉复合体的神经血管束逆行释放:优化功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
4
Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.勃起硬度评分作为评估日本男性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复的诊断工具的意义。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):221-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0571-2. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
5
Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的功能恢复、肿瘤学结果和术后并发症:比较保留耻骨前列腺韧带和标准方法的循证分析。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1210-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.保留神经的机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术:单一大容量中心的手术技术、肿瘤学和功能结果。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):837-844. doi: 10.1111/bju.14517. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
7
A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.一种与保留术中筋膜范围相关的预测模型,用于预测神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
8
Recovery of Baseline Erectile Function in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Measures.高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后男性基线勃起功能的恢复:一项使用有效测量方法的前瞻性分析
J Sex Med. 2016 Mar;13(3):435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.005.
9
Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.切换技术可允许逆行早期释放,以在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中促进保留神经血管束:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jan 3;37(1):e6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e6.
10
Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中各种保留神经血管束技术的现状
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0607-7. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Clipless robot-assisted Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy: a study on its safety profile and outcomes.无夹钳机器人辅助保留Retzius筋膜的根治性前列腺切除术:安全性及疗效研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 9;19(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02321-5.
2
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes after Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center, Two-Arm Prospective Study.保留神经的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危局限性前列腺癌后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项单中心双臂前瞻性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 11;14(8):803. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14080803.
3
Monitoring the delicate operations of surgical robots via ultra-sensitive ionic electronic skin.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留背静脉复合体的神经血管束逆行释放:优化功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
2
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:谁是赢家?
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
3
Role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer.
通过超灵敏离子电子皮肤监测手术机器人的精细操作。
Natl Sci Rev. 2022 Oct 21;9(12):nwac227. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac227. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Nerve-sparing Techniques During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Clips or Low-energy Bipolar Coagulation? Low Energy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的神经保留技术:钛夹还是低能量双极电凝?低能量。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Sep 1;44:102-103. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.06.011. eCollection 2022 Oct.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术在局部晚期前列腺癌中的作用。
Int J Urol. 2018 Jan;25(1):30-35. doi: 10.1111/iju.13441. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
4
Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.经腹腔镜前列腺切除术机器人开放试验:开放耻骨后和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的勃起功能和肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):618-627. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
5
Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术方法对高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术中标本边缘和生化复发的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1481-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2021-9. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的全解剖重建:对早期尿控恢复的影响。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):485-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
7
Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的短期疗效比较。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):660-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.036. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
8
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.EAU 前列腺癌指南。第二部分:晚期、复发性和去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):467-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.EAU 前列腺癌指南。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗——2013 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):124-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
10
Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach.根治性前列腺切除术后的围手术期并发症:开放手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术方法对比
Urol Int. 2013;90(3):312-5. doi: 10.1159/000345323. Epub 2013 Mar 6.