• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无夹钳机器人辅助保留Retzius筋膜的根治性前列腺切除术:安全性及疗效研究

Clipless robot-assisted Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy: a study on its safety profile and outcomes.

作者信息

Carbin Danny Darlington, Antonoglou Georgios, Harmouche Celine, Abou Chedid Wissam

机构信息

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK.

Department of Radiology, Ashford and St.Peters NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, UK.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 9;19(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02321-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02321-5
PMID:40205239
Abstract

Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP) is a modification of the standard RARP technique that traditionally requires clips to control the pedicles. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes of this altogether 'clipless' approach to RS-RARP from our centre. The study was conducted as a retrospective audit in our department. We included consecutive patients who underwent clipless-RS-RARP in our centre from February 2023 to December 2023. The clipless RS-RARP was done with the daVinci Xi system in all cases (primary surgeon-author WAC). No clips were used in these procedures and the preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative data were recorded with at least 3 months of follow-up. Continence was defined as zero pad usage. A total of 138 patients underwent RS-RAP using the clipless technique during the study period. The median age was 64 years, with a median BMI of 27.25 kg/m. 88.41% were ISUP 1-3 group patients. 82.61% were cT2, 17.39% were cT3, and 13.77% had median lobe in MRI. The mean console time was 99 min, with 81.16% having bilateral nerve spare, 17.39% unilateral spare, and 1.45% having none. 38.41% were fit to be discharged on the same day/evening of admission/surgery. There were no major complications (Clavien-Dindo [CD] ≥ 3) or postoperative bleeding. The margin positivity rate was 19.50%, of which 62.95% were stage ≥ pT3a. The continence rates were 86.2% at 6 weeks 89.1% at 3 months and 93.4% at 6 months. The potency and biochemical recurrence rates were 79% and 3.6%, respectively, at 6 months.Clipless RS-RARP is a safe procedure with good oncological and early continence recovery. This modification avoids clip-related complications without the expense of any higher complication rates compared to a standard RARP.

摘要

保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RS-RARP)是对标准RARP技术的一种改良,传统的标准RARP技术需要使用夹子来控制血管蒂。我们旨在回顾性分析我们中心采用这种完全“无夹”方法进行RS-RARP的手术、肿瘤学和功能结果。该研究在我们科室进行回顾性审计。我们纳入了2023年2月至2023年12月在我们中心接受无夹RS-RARP的连续患者。所有病例均使用达芬奇Xi系统进行无夹RS-RARP(主刀医生为本文作者WAC)。这些手术中未使用夹子,并记录了术前、术中及术后数据,随访至少3个月。控尿定义为无需使用尿垫。在研究期间,共有138例患者采用无夹技术接受了RS-RAP。中位年龄为64岁,中位体重指数为27.25kg/m²。88.41%为国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)1-3组患者。82.61%为cT2期,17.39%为cT3期,13.77%在MRI检查中有中叶受累。平均控制台操作时间为99分钟,81.16%的患者保留双侧神经,17.39%保留单侧神经,1.45%未保留神经。38.41%的患者适合在入院/手术后当天/当晚出院。无重大并发症(Clavien-Dindo[CD]≥3级)或术后出血。切缘阳性率为19.50%,其中62.95%为≥pT3a期。6周时控尿率为86.2%,3个月时为89.1%,6个月时为93.4%。6个月时性功能恢复率和生化复发率分别为79%和3.6%。无夹RS-RARP是一种安全的手术,具有良好的肿瘤学效果和早期控尿恢复。与标准RARP相比,这种改良避免了与夹子相关的并发症,且不会增加任何更高的并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
Clipless robot-assisted Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy: a study on its safety profile and outcomes.无夹钳机器人辅助保留Retzius筋膜的根治性前列腺切除术:安全性及疗效研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 9;19(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02321-5.
2
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与常规机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗经活检证实的前列腺癌患者的手术和功能结局。这些结果是否值得?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate. 2023 Nov;83(15):1395-1414. doi: 10.1002/pros.24604. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
5
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
6
Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.保留耻骨前列腺悬韧带与标准机器人前列腺切除术的疗效比较:一项国际多外科医生系列研究。
J Urol. 2021 Nov;206(5):1184-1191. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001939. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
7
Perioperative and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: evidence based on randomized-controlled trials.保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与传统机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期及功能结局:基于随机对照试验的证据
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 8;19(1):208. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02337-x.
8
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:一项为期19个月随访的前瞻性对照研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):586-594. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03830-8. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:使用 Revo-i 机器人手术系统的手术技术和初步临床研究结果。
BJU Int. 2018 Sep;122(3):441-448. doi: 10.1111/bju.14245. Epub 2018 May 27.
10
Comparison of Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.保留耻骨前列腺韧带与标准机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术的比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun;46(5):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Comment on "Clipless robot-assisted Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy: a study on its safety profile and outcomes".关于“无夹机器人辅助保留Retzius间隙根治性前列腺切除术:安全性及疗效研究”的评论
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 22;19(1):169. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02352-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Nerve-sparing Techniques During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Clips or Low-energy Bipolar Coagulation? Low Energy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的神经保留技术:钛夹还是低能量双极电凝?低能量。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Sep 1;44:102-103. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.06.011. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Is the Choice Between Clips and No Clips or Cautery and No Cautery Still a Dilemma in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy?在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中,使用夹子与不使用夹子或使用电灼与不使用电灼之间的选择仍然是一个难题吗?
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Aug 30;44:76-77. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.010. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Different Nerve-Sparing Techniques during Radical Prostatectomy and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes.
根治性前列腺切除术中不同的神经保留技术及其对功能结局的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;14(7):1601. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071601.
4
Clipless Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Impact on Outcomes.无夹闭机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术及其对结局的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1176-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
5
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.机器人辅助无夹闭筋膜内神经血管束保留前列腺癌根治术:手术技术及一年的功能和肿瘤学结果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 19;10(1):17595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74513-y.
6
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Comparative Analysis of Functional Outcomes Between Two Different Techniques After 1088 Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomies in a High-Volume Cancer Center: A Clipless Approach.在一家高容量癌症中心的 1088 例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后,两种不同技术的功能结果比较分析:无夹闭技术。
J Endourol. 2019 Dec;33(12):1017-1024. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0361. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Retzius Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Conveys Early Regain of Continence over Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 1,863 Patients.保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助前列腺根治术较传统机器人辅助前列腺根治术在早期恢复控尿方面具有优势:1863 例患者倾向性评分匹配分析。
J Urol. 2020 Jan;203(1):137-144. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000461. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
9
Hem-o-lok clip: a neglected cause of severe bladder neck contracture and consequent urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Hem-o-lok 夹:机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术后严重膀胱颈挛缩和随后发生尿失禁的被忽视原因。
BMC Urol. 2014 Feb 20;14:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-21.
10
Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up.保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术学习曲线之外:≥1 年随访的前 200 例患者的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):974-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046. Epub 2013 Jul 8.