• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威胁评估中注视点固着的认知情感驱动因素。

Cognitive-affective drivers of fixation in threat assessment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Washington University at St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2021 Apr;39(2):170-189. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2486. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.2486
PMID:33078434
Abstract

Pathological fixation - preoccupation with a person or a cause that is accompanied by deterioration in social and occupational functioning - has been found to precede most cases of targeted violence. It is clinically observed and theorized to have three different cognitive-affective drivers: delusion, obsession, or extreme overvalued belief. Each driver is explained, and case examples are provided in the context of threat assessment. Extreme overvalued belief as a new concept is discussed in detail, both its historical provenance and its demarcation from delusions and obsessions. Threat management for each separate cognitive-affective driver is briefly summarized, based upon current clinical findings and research. Emphasis is placed upon understanding both the categorical and dimensional nature (intensity) of these cognitive-affective drivers, and suggested guidelines are offered for the assessment of such in a clinical examination by a forensic psychiatrist or psychologist.

摘要

病理性固着 - 对一个人或一个原因的过分关注,同时伴有社会和职业功能的恶化 - 已被发现存在于大多数有针对性暴力的病例之前。临床上观察到并理论上认为有三种不同的认知情感驱动因素:妄想、痴迷或极端高估的信念。每个驱动因素都有解释,并在威胁评估的背景下提供了案例示例。作为一个新概念,极度高估的信念被详细讨论,包括其历史渊源及其与妄想和痴迷的区别。根据当前的临床发现和研究,简要总结了每种单独的认知情感驱动因素的威胁管理。重点是理解这些认知情感驱动因素的类别和维度性质(强度),并提供了评估临床检查中这些因素的建议指南,由法医精神病学家或心理学家进行。

相似文献

1
Cognitive-affective drivers of fixation in threat assessment.威胁评估中注视点固着的认知情感驱动因素。
Behav Sci Law. 2021 Apr;39(2):170-189. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2486. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
2
Extreme Overvalued Beliefs.极端高估的信念。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Sep;48(3):319-326. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.200001-20. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Extreme Overvalued Belief and the Legacy of Carl Wernicke.极度高估的信念与卡尔·韦尼克的遗产。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2019 Jun;47(2):180-187. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003847-19. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Forensic Psychiatry versus the Varieties of Delusion-Like Belief.法医精神病学与类似妄想的各种信念。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Sep;48(3):327-334. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.200013-20. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Cognitive impairments may mimic delusions.认知障碍可能会伪装成妄想。
Med Hypotheses. 2015 Dec;85(6):870-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
6
Anders Breivik: Extreme Beliefs Mistaken for Psychosis.安德斯·布雷维克:被误认为精神病的极端信仰。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2016 Mar;44(1):28-35.
7
Extreme Overvalued Beliefs: How Violent Extremist Beliefs Become "Normalized".极端高估的信念:暴力极端主义信念如何“常态化”
Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Jan 12;8(1):10. doi: 10.3390/bs8010010.
8
[Cenesthopathies: a disorder of background emotions at the crossroads of the cognitive sciences and phenomenology].[本体感觉障碍:处于认知科学与现象学交叉点的背景情绪障碍]
Encephale. 2011 Oct;37(5):361-70. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
9
A comparison of delusions and overvalued ideas.妄想与超价观念的比较。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Jan;198(1):35-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181c818b2.
10
[Clinical and psychological mechanisms involved in the formation of syndromes of delusional and overvalued constructions].
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2016;116(1):23-28. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20161161123-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Extreme overvalued beliefs and identities: revisiting the drivers of violent extremism.极端高估的信念与身份认同:重新审视暴力极端主义的驱动因素
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 5;16:1556919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1556919. eCollection 2025.
2
Delusional Themes are More Varied Than Previously Assumed: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.妄想主题比先前假设的更多样化:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2025 May 8;51(3):637-645. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae225.
3
Understanding the role of grievance and fixation in lone actor violence.
理解不满情绪和执着心态在独狼式暴力行为中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1045694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1045694. eCollection 2022.
4
A Clinical and Psychopathological Approach to Radicalization Among Adolescents.一种针对青少年激进化的临床和精神病理学方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:788154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.788154. eCollection 2022.