Suppr超能文献

威胁评估中注视点固着的认知情感驱动因素。

Cognitive-affective drivers of fixation in threat assessment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Washington University at St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2021 Apr;39(2):170-189. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2486. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

Abstract

Pathological fixation - preoccupation with a person or a cause that is accompanied by deterioration in social and occupational functioning - has been found to precede most cases of targeted violence. It is clinically observed and theorized to have three different cognitive-affective drivers: delusion, obsession, or extreme overvalued belief. Each driver is explained, and case examples are provided in the context of threat assessment. Extreme overvalued belief as a new concept is discussed in detail, both its historical provenance and its demarcation from delusions and obsessions. Threat management for each separate cognitive-affective driver is briefly summarized, based upon current clinical findings and research. Emphasis is placed upon understanding both the categorical and dimensional nature (intensity) of these cognitive-affective drivers, and suggested guidelines are offered for the assessment of such in a clinical examination by a forensic psychiatrist or psychologist.

摘要

病理性固着 - 对一个人或一个原因的过分关注,同时伴有社会和职业功能的恶化 - 已被发现存在于大多数有针对性暴力的病例之前。临床上观察到并理论上认为有三种不同的认知情感驱动因素:妄想、痴迷或极端高估的信念。每个驱动因素都有解释,并在威胁评估的背景下提供了案例示例。作为一个新概念,极度高估的信念被详细讨论,包括其历史渊源及其与妄想和痴迷的区别。根据当前的临床发现和研究,简要总结了每种单独的认知情感驱动因素的威胁管理。重点是理解这些认知情感驱动因素的类别和维度性质(强度),并提供了评估临床检查中这些因素的建议指南,由法医精神病学家或心理学家进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验