Taieb Vanessa, Ikeoka Hidetoshi, Wojciechowski Piotr, Jablonska Katarzyna, Aballea Samuel, Hill Mark, Hirotsu Nobuo
Creativ-Ceutical, London, UK.
Medical Affairs, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Feb;37(2):225-244. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1839400. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
Previous network meta-analysis (NMA) demonstrated advantageous or similar efficacy of baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) over neuraminidase inhibitors in otherwise healthy (OwH) influenza patients. This analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of baloxavir in the subgroup of high-risk (HR) patients and in the population of uncomplicated influenza consisting of OwH and HR patients with influenza.
A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and ICHUSHI up to August 8th, 2018. A Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare baloxavir with oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir and peramivir in HR patients and all uncomplicated patients.
Based on the SLR, a total of 32 studies were identified as pertinent for the analysis, including 7 studies on HR patients, 13 trials on OwH patients and 14 studies on OwH + HR population. NMA of 10 trials assessing HR patients demonstrated comparable time to alleviation of symptoms for all treatments. Mean decline in virus titer from baseline at 24 h after treatment was significantly greater for baloxavir compared with oseltamivir and peramivir. The risks of total complications and drug-related adverse events were comparable between baloxavir and zanamivir, oseltamivir and laninamivir. These findings were highly consistent with results of the NMA using pooled evidence on the uncomplicated population of OwH and HR patients.
Baloxavir was significantly more effective than placebo regarding all outcomes except for the risk of pneumonia. Besides, baloxavir was associated with similar clinical efficacy and safety, and superior antiviral activity compared to other antivirals in HR patients, as well as in the entire population of uncomplicated patients with influenza.
既往网状Meta分析(NMA)表明,在健康状况良好(OwH)的流感患者中,巴洛沙韦酯(巴洛沙韦)相对于神经氨酸酶抑制剂具有优势或相似的疗效。本分析评估了巴洛沙韦在高危(HR)患者亚组以及由OwH和HR流感患者组成的单纯性流感人群中的疗效和安全性。
截至2018年8月8日,在Medline、Embase、CENTRAL和ICHUSHI中进行了系统文献回顾(SLR)。进行了贝叶斯NMA,以比较巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦、扎那米韦、拉尼米韦和帕拉米韦在HR患者和所有单纯性流感患者中的疗效。
基于SLR,共确定32项研究与分析相关,包括7项关于HR患者的研究、13项关于OwH患者的试验和14项关于OwH+HR人群的研究。对10项评估HR患者的试验进行的NMA表明,所有治疗的症状缓解时间相当。与奥司他韦和帕拉米韦相比,治疗后24小时巴洛沙韦的病毒滴度较基线的平均下降幅度显著更大。巴洛沙韦与扎那米韦、奥司他韦和拉尼米韦之间的总并发症风险和药物相关不良事件风险相当。这些发现与使用OwH和HR患者单纯性流感人群汇总证据进行的NMA结果高度一致。
除肺炎风险外,巴洛沙韦在所有结局方面均显著优于安慰剂。此外,与其他抗病毒药物相比,巴洛沙韦在HR患者以及所有单纯性流感患者人群中具有相似的临床疗效和安全性,且抗病毒活性更强。