Kinnunen Jaana M, Rimpelä Arja H, Lindfors Pirjo L, Clancy Luke, Alves Joana, Hoffmann Laura, Richter Matthias, Kunst Anton E, Lorant Vincent
Faculty of Social Sciences, Unit of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, Pitkäniemi Hospital, Nokia, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):402-408. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa145.
Studies comparing adolescent e-cigarette use in different countries are scarce. We study students' e-cigarette and conventional cigarette ever-use, their social correlates and e-liquid use in seven EU countries.
SILNE-R data (N=12 167, response rate 79.4%) of 14-17-year-olds from Amersfoort (NL), Coimbra (PT), Dublin (IR), Hanover (GE), Latina (IT), Namur (BE) and Tampere (FI) were used. E-cigarette and conventional cigarette ever-use, dual-use, type of e-liquid and social correlates were measured with a school survey and analyzed with cross-tabulations and multinomial logistic regression.
About 34% had tried e-cigarettes, but the variation was large between the cities (Latina 50%; Hanover 23%). Of e-cigarette ever-users, 37% had used nicotine e-liquid, 43% exclusively non-nicotine liquid and 20% did not know the content. Nicotine e-liquid was more prevalent among monthly e-cigarette users and weekly smoking e-cigarette users. The social correlates were mainly the same for exclusive e-cigarette ever-use, exclusive conventional cigarette ever-use and dual-use. Boys had greater odds for exclusive e-cigarette and dual-use compared to girls. Of social correlates, low academic achievement and parental smoking were positively associated with all categories of use, but parental education and immigrant background were not. The strongest association was found between peer smoking (most/all best friends smoke) and dual-use (OR 34.29).
Students' e-cigarette ever-use varies greatly between EU countries. E-cigarettes seem not to be a substitute for conventional cigarettes but more a complementary product. Tobacco control policies might also prevent e-cigarette use but specific regulations on e-cigarettes are needed to prevent nicotine addiction originating from them.
比较不同国家青少年电子烟使用情况的研究较少。我们研究了七个欧盟国家学生的电子烟和传统香烟使用情况、其社会关联因素以及电子烟液的使用情况。
使用了来自阿默斯福特(荷兰)、科英布拉(葡萄牙)、都柏林(爱尔兰)、汉诺威(德国)、拉蒂纳(意大利)、那慕尔(比利时)和坦佩雷(芬兰)的14至17岁学生的SILNE-R数据(N = 12167,回复率79.4%)。通过学校调查测量了电子烟和传统香烟的曾经使用情况、双重使用情况、电子烟液类型以及社会关联因素,并使用交叉表和多项逻辑回归进行分析。
约34%的学生曾尝试使用电子烟,但城市之间差异很大(拉蒂纳为50%;汉诺威为23%)。在曾经使用电子烟的人群中,37%使用过含尼古丁的电子烟液,43%仅使用不含尼古丁的液体,20%不知道其成分。含尼古丁的电子烟液在每月使用电子烟的人群和每周吸食电子烟的人群中更为普遍。电子烟单独使用、传统香烟单独使用和双重使用的社会关联因素基本相同。与女孩相比,男孩单独使用电子烟和双重使用的几率更高。在社会关联因素中,学业成绩低和父母吸烟与所有使用类别呈正相关,但父母教育程度和移民背景则不然。在同伴吸烟(大多数/所有最好的朋友吸烟)和双重使用之间发现了最强的关联(比值比34.29)。
欧盟国家学生的电子烟曾经使用率差异很大。电子烟似乎不是传统香烟的替代品,而更像是一种补充产品。烟草控制政策可能也能预防电子烟的使用,但需要针对电子烟的具体规定来防止由此产生尼古丁成瘾。