Wiggins George A R, Walker Logan C, Pearson John F
Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
Biostatistics and Computational Biology Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 16;12(10):3015. doi: 10.3390/cancers12103015.
Germline pathogenic variants in and increase cumulative lifetime risk up to 75% for breast cancer and 76% for ovarian cancer. Genetic testing for and pathogenic variants has become an important part of clinical practice for cancer risk assessment and for reducing individual risk of developing cancer. Genetic testing can produce three outcomes: positive (a pathogenic variant), uninformative (no pathogenic variant) and uncertain significance (a variant of unknown clinical significance). More than one third of and variants identified have been classified as variants of uncertain significance, presenting a challenge for clinicians. To address this important clinical challenge, a number of studies have been undertaken to establish a gene expression phenotype for pathogenic and variant carriers in several diseased and normal tissues. However, the consistency of gene expression phenotypes described in studies has been poor. To determine if gene expression analysis has been a successful approach for variant classification, we describe the design and comparability of 23 published gene expression studies that have profiled cells from and pathogenic variant carriers. We show the impact of advancements in expression-based technologies, the importance of developing larger study cohorts and the necessity to better understand variables affecting gene expression profiles across different tissue types.
BRCA1和BRCA2的种系致病变体将乳腺癌的累积终生风险提高至75%,卵巢癌的累积终生风险提高至76%。对BRCA1和BRCA2致病变体进行基因检测已成为癌症风险评估临床实践以及降低个体患癌风险的重要组成部分。基因检测可产生三种结果:阳性(致病变体)、无信息(无致病变体)和意义不明确(临床意义未知的变体)。已鉴定出的BRCA1和BRCA2变体中,超过三分之一被归类为意义不明确的变体,这给临床医生带来了挑战。为应对这一重要的临床挑战,已开展了多项研究,以确定患病组织和正常组织中BRCA1和BRCA2致病变体携带者的基因表达表型。然而,各研究中所描述的基因表达表型的一致性较差。为确定基因表达分析是否是一种成功的变体分类方法,我们描述了23项已发表的基因表达研究的设计和可比性,这些研究对BRCA1和BRCA2致病变体携带者的细胞进行了分析。我们展示了基于表达的技术进步的影响、建立更大研究队列的重要性以及更好地了解影响不同组织类型基因表达谱的变量的必要性。