• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的韩国患者基因与相关乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险分析:一项多中心队列研究。

A Population-Based Analysis of / Genes and Associated Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in Korean Patients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

作者信息

Park Kyung-Sun, Lee Woochang, Seong Moon-Woo, Kong Sun-Young, Lee Kyung-A, Ha Jung-Sook, Cho Eun-Hae, Han Sung-Hee, Park Inho, Kim Jong-Won

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine and Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul 02447, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 2;13(9):2192. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092192.

DOI:10.3390/cancers13092192
PMID:34063308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8125125/
Abstract

In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of / variants and associated cancer risk in Korean patients considering two aspects: variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PLPVs) in and . This study included 5433 Korean participants who were tested for genes. The variants were classified following the standards/guidelines for interpretation of genetic variants and using a multifactorial probability-based approach. In Korea, 15.8% of participants had or PLPVs. To estimate the additional sample numbers needed to resolve unclassified status, we applied a simulation analysis. The simulation study for VUS showed that the smaller the number of samples, the more the posterior probability was affected by the prior probability; in addition, more samples for VUS than those of VUS were required to resolve the unclassified status, and the presence of clinical information associated with their VUS was an important factor. The cumulative lifetime breast cancer risk was 59.1% (95% CI: 44.1-73.6%) for and 58.3% (95% CI: 43.2-73.0%) for carriers. The cumulative lifetime ovarian cancer risk was estimated to be 36.9% (95% CI: 23.4-53.9%) for and 14.9% (95% CI: 7.4-28.5%) for carriers.

摘要

在本研究中,我们从两个方面对韩国患者的/变体及相关癌症风险进行了全面分析:不确定意义的变体(VUS)以及和中的致病或可能致病变体(PLPVs)。本研究纳入了5433名接受基因检测的韩国参与者。这些变体依据遗传变体解读的标准/指南并采用基于多因素概率的方法进行分类。在韩国,15.8%的参与者携带或PLPVs。为估计解决未分类状态所需的额外样本数量,我们进行了模拟分析。对VUS的模拟研究表明,样本数量越少,后验概率受先验概率的影响就越大;此外,解决未分类状态需要的VUS样本比VUS的样本更多,并且与VUS相关的临床信息的存在是一个重要因素。对于携带者,累积终生乳腺癌风险为59.1%(95%CI:44.1 - 73.6%),对于携带者为58.3%(95%CI:43.2 - 73.0%)。对于携带者,累积终生卵巢癌风险估计为36.9%(95%CI:23.4 - 53.9%),对于携带者为14.9%(95%CI:7.4 - 28.5%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/062a/8125125/eb3ebc5a1998/cancers-13-02192-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/062a/8125125/cf5bbc220d22/cancers-13-02192-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/062a/8125125/98382a451b95/cancers-13-02192-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/062a/8125125/eb3ebc5a1998/cancers-13-02192-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/062a/8125125/cf5bbc220d22/cancers-13-02192-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/062a/8125125/98382a451b95/cancers-13-02192-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/062a/8125125/eb3ebc5a1998/cancers-13-02192-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Population-Based Analysis of / Genes and Associated Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in Korean Patients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.基于人群的韩国患者基因与相关乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险分析:一项多中心队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 2;13(9):2192. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092192.
2
Comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with breast cancer: a multifactorial probability-based model versus ACMG standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants.乳腺癌患者中意义未明的BRCA1和BRCA2变异的比较分析:一种基于多因素概率的模型与美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)解释序列变异的标准和指南
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1250-1257. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.39. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Reclassification of and variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort.多中心前瞻性队列的多因素分析:和意义不明变异体的重新分类。
J Med Genet. 2018 Dec;55(12):794-802. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
4
A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).基于多因素概率的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 意义未明变异体(VUS)分类模型的回顾。
Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan;33(1):8-21. doi: 10.1002/humu.21627. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
5
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.采用 ACMG/AMP 2015 指南重新解读遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中意义未明的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
Reclassification of and variants found in ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers.卵巢上皮性、输卵管和原发性腹膜癌中发现的 和 变异体的重新分类。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(6):e83. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e83.
7
Landscape of germline variants in breast and ovarian cancer in Peru.秘鲁乳腺癌和卵巢癌种系变异情况
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 17;13:1227864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1227864. eCollection 2023.
8
Pathogenicity evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants identified in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families.葡萄牙乳腺癌/卵巢癌家系中鉴定的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 未分类变异体的致病性评估。
J Mol Diagn. 2014 May;16(3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
9
10
Clinically applicable models to characterize BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance.用于表征意义未明的BRCA1和BRCA2变异体的临床适用模型。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5393-400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.8228. Epub 2008 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Basic knowledge for counseling patients undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.为接受降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术的患者提供咨询的基础知识。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Jul;67(4):343-355. doi: 10.5468/ogs.24054. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
-specific machine learning model predicts variant pathogenicity with high accuracy.-特定的机器学习模型可以高精度地预测变异的致病性。
Physiol Genomics. 2023 Aug 1;55(8):315-323. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00033.2023. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
3
Gene-specific machine learning model to predict the pathogenicity of variants.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer Risk Genes - Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women.乳腺癌风险基因 - 超过 113000 名女性的关联分析。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):428-439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913948. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer.基于人群的先前与乳腺癌相关的基因研究。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):440-451. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005936. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
Ethnic-specific variation within Asia population: evidence from over 78 000 cancer and 40 000 non-cancer cases of Indian, Chinese, Korean and Japanese populations.
用于预测变异致病性的基因特异性机器学习模型。
Front Genet. 2022 Sep 30;13:982930. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.982930. eCollection 2022.
亚洲人群中的种族特异性变异:来自印度、中国、韩国和日本人群中超过 78000 例癌症和 40000 例非癌症病例的证据。
J Med Genet. 2021 Nov;58(11):752-759. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107299. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
Clinicopathological Features of Patients with the BRCA1 c.5339T>C (p.Leu1780Pro) Variant.BRCA1 c.5339T>C(p.Leu1780Pro)变异患者的临床病理特征。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):680-688. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.351. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
Global patterns and trends in ovarian cancer incidence: age, period and birth cohort analysis.全球卵巢癌发病率的模式和趋势:年龄、时期和出生队列分析。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6139-6.
6
Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification.大规模多因素似然定量分析 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变体:支持临床变异分类的 ENIGMA 资源。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1557-1578. doi: 10.1002/humu.23818.
7
Is Breast Cancer in Asian and Asian American Women a Different Disease?亚洲及亚裔美国女性的乳腺癌是一种不同的疾病吗?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Dec 1;111(12):1243-1244. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz091.
8
Contrasting Epidemiology and Clinicopathology of Female Breast Cancer in Asians vs the US Population.亚洲女性乳腺癌的流行病学和临床病理学与美国人群的对比。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Dec 1;111(12):1298-1306. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz090.
9
Cancer geneticists tackle troubling ethnic bias in studies.癌症遗传学家应对研究中令人不安的种族偏见问题。
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7751):154-155. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01080-2.
10
Towards controlled terminology for reporting germline cancer susceptibility variants: an ENIGMA report.针对种系癌症易感性变异报告的受控术语:ENIGMA 报告。
J Med Genet. 2019 Jun;56(6):347-357. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105872. Epub 2019 Apr 8.