Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Health Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 20;18(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01568-w.
We aimed to investigate the acceptability of imperfect health states in relation to age in Hungary and analyse its determinants. Results are contrasted to age-matched actual population health scores and to findings from a previous study in The Netherlands.
A cross-sectional online survey was performed. The same survey questions were applied as in a previous study in The Netherlands in order to enable inter-country comparisons. The descriptive system of the EQ-5D-3L health status questionnaire was used to assess the acceptability of moderate and severe health problems at ages from 30 to 80 by 10-year age-groups. Descriptive statistics were performed and linear regression analysis was used to investigate the determinants of acceptability.
Altogether 9281 (female 32.8%) were involved with mean age 36.0 years and EQ-5D-3L index score of 0.852 (SD 0.177). Acceptability of health problems increased with age, differed per health domain and with severity of the problems. Except for 'Self-care', moderate health problems were acceptable by the majority from age 70 and acceptability scores were lower than EQ-5D-3L population norms from that age. The lowest average acceptability age was found in the 'Anxiety/depression' and dimension the highest in the 'Self-care' dimension. Respondents' age, current health, and lifestyle were significant determinants (R: 0.041-0.130). With a few minor exceptions in some health dimensions, acceptability levels and patterns were strikingly similar to the Dutch findings.
In Hungary, acceptability of health problems increases with age and the majority found severe problems never acceptable. Views on acceptability of health problems seem to be fairly generalizable across European countries with different health and economic indicators.
本研究旨在探讨匈牙利人群对不完美健康状态的可接受性与年龄的关系,并分析其决定因素。研究结果与年龄匹配的实际人群健康评分以及荷兰先前的研究结果进行了对比。
本研究采用了横断面在线调查。为了实现跨国比较,应用了与荷兰先前研究相同的调查问题。采用 EQ-5D-3L 健康状况问卷的描述性系统,按 10 年为一个年龄组,评估 30 至 80 岁人群中中度和重度健康问题的可接受性。进行描述性统计,并采用线性回归分析来研究可接受性的决定因素。
共有 9281 人(女性占 32.8%)参与了研究,平均年龄为 36.0 岁,EQ-5D-3L 指数评分为 0.852(SD 0.177)。健康问题的可接受性随年龄增长而增加,在各健康领域和严重程度上存在差异。除了“自我照顾”维度,从 70 岁开始,大多数人认为中度健康问题是可以接受的,且从该年龄起,可接受性评分低于 EQ-5D-3L 人群正常值。“焦虑/抑郁”维度的平均可接受年龄最低,而“自我照顾”维度的平均可接受年龄最高。受访者的年龄、当前健康状况和生活方式是显著的决定因素(R:0.041-0.130)。除了一些健康维度的细微差异外,匈牙利的可接受性水平和模式与荷兰的发现惊人地相似。
在匈牙利,健康问题的可接受性随年龄增长而增加,大多数人认为严重问题是不可接受的。对健康问题可接受性的看法似乎在具有不同健康和经济指标的欧洲国家具有相当的普遍性。