• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量 EQ-5D-3L 健康状态在不同年龄组的可接受性:一种新的适应性调查方法。

Measuring the acceptability of EQ-5D-3L health states for different ages: a new adaptive survey methodology.

机构信息

Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Tóth Kálmán u 4., Budapest, 1097, Hungary.

Institute of Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., Budapest, 1093, Hungary.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Sep;23(7):1243-1255. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01424-8. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-021-01424-8
PMID:34985585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9395309/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acceptable health and sufficientarianism are emerging concepts in health resource allocation. We defined acceptability as the proportion of the general population who consider a health state acceptable for a given age. Previous studies surveyed the acceptability of health problems separately per EQ-5D-3L domain, while the acceptability of health states with co-occurring problems was barely explored.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the acceptability of 243 EQ-5D-3L health states for six ages from 30 to 80 years: 1458 health state-age combinations (HAcs), denoted as the acceptability set of EQ-5D-3L.

METHODS

In 2019, an online representative survey was conducted in the Hungarian general population. We developed a novel adaptive survey algorithm and a matching statistical measurement model. The acceptability of problems was evaluated separately per EQ-5D-3L domain, followed by joint evaluation of up to 15 HAcs. The selection of HAcs depended on respondents' previous responses. We used an empirical Bayes measurement model to estimate the full acceptability set.

RESULTS

1375 respondents (female: 50.7%) were included with mean (SD) age of 46.7 (14.6) years. We demonstrated that single problems that were acceptable separately for a given age were less acceptable when co-occurring jointly (p < 0.001). For 30 years of age, EQ-5D-3L health states of '11112' (11.9%) and '33333' (1%), while for 80 years of age '21111' (93.3%) and '33333' (7.4%) had highest and lowest acceptability (% of population), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The acceptability set of EQ-5D-3L quantifies societal preferences concerning age and disease severity. Its measurement profiles and potential role in health resource allocation needs further exploration.

摘要

背景

可接受性和足够主义是卫生资源分配中的新兴概念。我们将可接受性定义为一般人群中认为特定年龄的健康状况可接受的比例。以前的研究分别调查了 EQ-5D-3L 每个领域的健康问题的可接受性,而几乎没有探索同时存在健康问题的健康状况的可接受性。

目的

量化 EQ-5D-3L 从 30 岁到 80 岁的 6 个年龄段的 243 个健康状态的可接受性:1458 个健康状态-年龄组合(HAc),表示为 EQ-5D-3L 的可接受性集。

方法

2019 年,在匈牙利普通人群中进行了一项在线代表性调查。我们开发了一种新的自适应调查算法和匹配的统计测量模型。按 EQ-5D-3L 每个领域分别评估问题的可接受性,然后对多达 15 个 HAc 进行联合评估。HAc 的选择取决于受访者的先前反应。我们使用经验贝叶斯测量模型来估计完整的可接受性集。

结果

1375 名受访者(女性:50.7%)参与了调查,平均年龄为 46.7(14.6)岁。我们证明,对于给定年龄单独可接受的单个问题,当共同出现时,其可接受性较低(p < 0.001)。对于 30 岁,EQ-5D-3L 健康状态“11112”(11.9%)和“33333”(1%)具有最高和最低的可接受性(人口百分比),而对于 80 岁,“21111”(93.3%)和“33333”(7.4%)具有最高和最低的可接受性(人口百分比)。

结论

EQ-5D-3L 的可接受性集量化了社会对年龄和疾病严重程度的偏好。它的测量分布及其在卫生资源分配中的潜在作用需要进一步探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/4eff116b8d87/10198_2021_1424_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/351f413c1a50/10198_2021_1424_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/d72fa04635d4/10198_2021_1424_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/d8ee01c70d6e/10198_2021_1424_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/97924e01cf8d/10198_2021_1424_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/10aba2ce03b4/10198_2021_1424_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/4eff116b8d87/10198_2021_1424_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/351f413c1a50/10198_2021_1424_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/d72fa04635d4/10198_2021_1424_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/d8ee01c70d6e/10198_2021_1424_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/97924e01cf8d/10198_2021_1424_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/10aba2ce03b4/10198_2021_1424_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/9395309/4eff116b8d87/10198_2021_1424_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring the acceptability of EQ-5D-3L health states for different ages: a new adaptive survey methodology.衡量 EQ-5D-3L 健康状态在不同年龄组的可接受性:一种新的适应性调查方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Sep;23(7):1243-1255. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01424-8. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
2
Population-level norm values by EQ-5D-3L in Hungary - a comparison of survey results from 2022 with those from 2000.匈牙利基于 EQ-5D-3L 的人群标准值 - 2022 年调查结果与 2000 年调查结果的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):2417-2428. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03699-9. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3
Acceptable health and ageing: results of a cross-sectional study from Hungary.可接受的健康和衰老:来自匈牙利的一项横断面研究结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 20;18(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01568-w.
4
Health-related quality of life in residents aged 18 years and older with and without disease: findings from the First Provincial Health Services Survey of Hunan, China.健康相关生活质量在 18 岁及以上有疾病和无疾病居民中的差异:来自中国湖南省第一次省级卫生服务调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e015880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015880.
5
The EQ-5D-5L Is Superior to the -3L Version in Measuring Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Awaiting THA or TKA.在测量等待全髋关节置换术或全膝关节置换术的患者的健康相关生活质量方面,EQ-5D-5L 优于 -3L 版本。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1632-1644. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000662.
6
Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?评估英格兰普通人群的健康状况:EQ-5D的三级版本和五级版本对比情况如何?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 21;13:171. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.
7
Towards a Central-Eastern European EQ-5D-3L population norm: comparing data from Hungarian, Polish and Slovenian population studies.迈向中东欧 EQ-5D-3L 人群标准:来自匈牙利、波兰和斯洛文尼亚人群研究的数据比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):141-154. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01071-0. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
Experience-based VAS values for EQ-5D-3L health states in a national general population health survey in China.中国全国普通人群健康调查中基于经验的EQ-5D-3L健康状态视觉模拟量表值
Qual Life Res. 2015 Mar;24(3):693-703. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0793-6. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
9
Determinants of the acceptability of health problems in different ages: exploring a new application of the EQ VAS.不同年龄段健康问题可接受性的决定因素:探索 EQ VAS 的新应用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01060-3. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in Hungary.匈牙利的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 量表值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01190-2. Epub 2022 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing a Learning Model for Correct Hand Hygiene Technique in a NICU.建立新生儿重症监护病房正确手部卫生技术的学习模型。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 22;11(15):4276. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154276.

本文引用的文献

1
Alternative Approaches to Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Estimation Within Standard Cost-Effectiveness Models: Literature Review, Feasibility Assessment, and Impact Evaluation.标准成本效益模型内的质量调整生命年估计替代方法:文献综述、可行性评估和影响评估。
Value Health. 2020 Dec;23(12):1523-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.08.2092. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Acceptable health and ageing: results of a cross-sectional study from Hungary.可接受的健康和衰老:来自匈牙利的一项横断面研究结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 20;18(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01568-w.
3
Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.
哪些多属性效用仪器推荐用于成本效用分析?国家卫生技术评估(HTA)指南的回顾。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1245-1257. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
4
Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.离散选择实验生成多属性效用工具的效用值:方法的系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;21(7):983-992. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01189-6. Epub 2020 May 4.
5
Determinants of the acceptability of health problems in different ages: exploring a new application of the EQ VAS.不同年龄段健康问题可接受性的决定因素:探索 EQ VAS 的新应用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01060-3. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Future Directions in Valuing Benefits for Estimating QALYs: Is Time Up for the EQ-5D?未来衡量效益以估算 QALY 值的方向:时间是否已到 EQ-5D 发挥作用的时候了?
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.12.001.
7
A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing the Measurement Properties of the Three-Level and Five-Level Versions of the EQ-5D.三水平版和五水平版 EQ-5D 测量性能比较的系统评价研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):645-661. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0642-5.
8
International Regulations and Recommendations for Utility Data for Health Technology Assessment.国际卫生技术评估实用数据法规与建议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Dec;35(Suppl 1):11-19. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0544-y.
9
Logical inconsistencies in time trade-off valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states: Whose fault is it?EQ-5D-5L健康状态时间权衡估值中的逻辑不一致:这是谁的错?
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184883. eCollection 2017.
10
Acceptable health and priority weighting: Discussing a reference-level approach using sufficientarian reasoning.可接受的健康与优先权重:使用功利主义推理探讨参考水平方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;181:158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.051. Epub 2017 Mar 27.