• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大流行与自由国际秩序的转型

The Pandemic and the Transformation of Liberal International Order.

作者信息

Huang Qingming

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603 USA.

出版信息

J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):1-26. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09698-0. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11366-020-09698-0
PMID:33082701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7565235/
Abstract

In 2018, 43 leading International Relations scholars in the United States signed a public statement in support of an urgent call to preserve the current international order, triggering heated scholarly debates. The idealized form of the liberal international order was criticized by many scholars for its chronic problems, including the contradictions between proclaimed liberal values and illiberal behaviors, the inability to reform its institutional pillars to accommodate the diverse group of emerging powers, and the tensions between the defenders of this order and its challengers. These problems became fully exposed under the external shock caused by the coronavirus pandemic. As the coronavirus spreads globally and disrupts the world's political, economic, and social fabric, several forces that have gained momentum and strength during the last decade are now converging as a formidable force that may reconfigure the post-pandemic international order. This paper addresses three significant challenges to the foundations of the current liberal order: (1) the entrenchment of authoritarianism, characterized by authoritarian resilience, autocratization, and the consolidation of competing authoritarian political-economic models; (2) the exacerbation of nationalism enabled by nationalist and populist politicians; and (3) the intensified competition among major powers. China has played mixed roles in the process of reconfiguring the current order. It challenges the mythologized liberal international order and exposes the contradictions in the dominant Western model, while promoting an alternative hybrid political-economic model. The shock brought by the pandemic has provided ample opportunities for China to extend its networks and expand international space for its model.

摘要

2018年,美国43位顶尖国际关系学者签署了一份公开声明,支持一项维护当前国际秩序的紧急呼吁,引发了激烈的学术辩论。许多学者批评自由国际秩序的理想化形式存在长期问题,包括宣称的自由价值观与非自由行为之间的矛盾、无法改革其制度支柱以容纳新兴大国的多样化群体,以及该秩序的捍卫者与挑战者之间的紧张关系。这些问题在新冠疫情造成的外部冲击下充分暴露出来。随着新冠病毒在全球传播,扰乱世界的政治、经济和社会结构,过去十年中获得势头和力量的几股力量现在正汇聚成一股强大力量,可能会重塑疫情后的国际秩序。本文探讨了当前自由秩序基础面临的三个重大挑战:(1)威权主义的强化,其特征是威权韧性、独裁化以及相互竞争的威权政治经济模式的巩固;(2)民族主义和民粹主义政治家助长的民族主义的加剧;(3)大国之间竞争的加剧。中国在重塑当前秩序的过程中扮演了复杂的角色。它挑战了被神话化的自由国际秩序,揭示了西方主导模式中的矛盾,同时推动了一种替代性的混合政治经济模式。疫情带来的冲击为中国扩展其网络、扩大其模式的国际空间提供了充足的机会。

相似文献

1
The Pandemic and the Transformation of Liberal International Order.大流行与自由国际秩序的转型
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):1-26. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09698-0. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Brexit, the Rise of China, and the Future of the Liberal International Order and Great Power Competition.英国脱欧、中国的崛起与自由国际秩序及大国竞争的未来。
Society. 2022;59(6):747-758. doi: 10.1007/s12115-022-00751-7. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment.族群民族主义民粹主义与集体怨恨的动员。
Br J Sociol. 2017 Nov;68 Suppl 1:S181-S213. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12325.
4
The Post-Pandemic World: between Constitutionalized and Authoritarian Orders - China's Narrative-Power Play in the Pandemic Era.后疫情时代:在宪制秩序与威权秩序之间——疫情时代中国的叙事权力博弈
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):27-65. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09695-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
5
Globalization/deglobalization: lessons from liberal monetary orders.全球化/去全球化:来自自由货币秩序的教训。
Int Aff. 2021 Sep 6;97(5):1505-1520. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiab089. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
COVID-19-related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy.与新冠疫情相关的焦虑情绪并不会降低对自由民主的支持度。
Eur J Polit Res. 2022 Sep 29. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12554.
7
Learning from precedent: how the British Brexit experience shapes nationalist rhetoric outside the UK.借鉴先例:英国脱欧经历如何塑造英国以外地区的民族主义言论。
J Eur Public Policy. 2023 Feb 13;31(5):1231-1258. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2176530. eCollection 2024.
8
COVID-19, nationalism, and the politics of crisis: A scholarly exchange.新冠疫情、民族主义与危机政治:学术交流
Nations Natl. 2020 Oct;26(4):807-825. doi: 10.1111/nana.12644. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
9
Understanding the role of nationalism in "new democracies".理解民族主义在“新民主国家”中的作用。
Coll Antropol. 1999 Jun;23(1):231-47.
10
Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony.新冠疫情是美国霸权的终结吗?公共弊病、领导力失败与货币霸权。
Int Aff. 2020 Sep;96(5):1281-1303. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiaa134. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Crisis and Intergovernmental Retrenchment in the European Union? Framing the EU's Answer to the COVID-19 Pandemic.欧盟的危机与政府间紧缩?勾勒欧盟应对新冠疫情的举措
Chin Polit Sci Rev. 2021;6(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s41111-020-00171-0. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
2
Media framing and expression of anti-China sentiment in COVID-19-related news discourse: An analysis using deep learning methods.新冠疫情相关新闻话语中反华情绪的媒体框架与表达:基于深度学习方法的分析
Heliyon. 2022 Aug;8(8):e10419. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10419. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
3
COVID-19 and the -how does the overseas Chinese community react to group criticism?新冠疫情与——海外华人社区如何回应群体批评? 你提供的原文中“the -”这里似乎有缺失内容。
J Chin Polit Sci. 2022;27(4):637-659. doi: 10.1007/s11366-021-09775-y. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
4
Top-Down and Bottom-Up Lockdown: Evidence from COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China.自上而下与自下而上的封锁:来自中国新冠疫情防控的证据
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):189-211. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09711-6. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The Politics of Blaming: the Narrative Battle between China and the US over COVID-19.指责的政治:中美在新冠疫情问题上的叙事之争
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(2):295-315. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09690-8. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
COVID-19, nationalism, and the politics of crisis: A scholarly exchange.新冠疫情、民族主义与危机政治:学术交流
Nations Natl. 2020 Oct;26(4):807-825. doi: 10.1111/nana.12644. Epub 2020 Jul 19.