Suppr超能文献

欧盟的危机与政府间紧缩?勾勒欧盟应对新冠疫情的举措

Crisis and Intergovernmental Retrenchment in the European Union? Framing the EU's Answer to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Salvati Eugenio

机构信息

Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, Via San Felice, 5, 27100 Pavia, PV Italy.

出版信息

Chin Polit Sci Rev. 2021;6(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s41111-020-00171-0. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has placed severe pressure on the EU's capacity to provide a timely and coordinated response capable of curbing the pandemic's disastrous economic and social effects on EU member states. In this situation, the supranational institutions and their models of action are evidently under pressure, seeming incapable of leading the EU out of the stormy waters of the present crisis. The article frames the first months of management of the COVID-19 crisis at EU level as characterised by the limited increase in the level of steering capacity by supranational institutions, due to the reaffirmed centrality of the intergovernmental option. To explain this situation, the article considers the absence of the institutional capacity/legitimacy to extract resources from society(ies), and the subsequent impossibility of guaranteeing an effective and autonomous process of political (re)distribution, the key factors accounting for the weakness of vertical political integration in the response to the COVID-19 challenge. This explains why during the COVID-19 crisis as well, the pattern followed by the EU is rather similar to past patterns, thus confirming that this has fed retrenchment aimed at the enforcement of the intergovernmental model and the defence of the most sensitive core state powers against inference from supranational EU institutions.

摘要

新冠疫情的爆发给欧盟及时做出协调应对的能力带来了巨大压力,这种应对需能够遏制疫情对欧盟成员国造成的灾难性经济和社会影响。在这种情况下,超国家机构及其行动模式显然面临压力,似乎无法带领欧盟走出当前危机的困境。本文将欧盟层面应对新冠疫情危机的头几个月描述为:由于政府间选择的核心地位再次得到确认,超国家机构的指导能力提升有限。为解释这种情况,本文认为缺乏从社会提取资源的机构能力/合法性,以及随后无法保证有效的自主政治(再)分配过程,是应对新冠疫情挑战时纵向政治一体化薄弱的关键因素。这就解释了为什么在新冠疫情危机期间,欧盟遵循的模式也与过去的模式颇为相似,从而证实这助长了旨在强化政府间模式以及捍卫最敏感的核心国家权力免受欧盟超国家机构干预的紧缩政策。

相似文献

5
Analysing the EU's collective securitisation moves towards China.分析欧盟针对中国的集体证券化举措。
Asia Eur J. 2022;20(2):195-216. doi: 10.1007/s10308-021-00640-4. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
8
Why and How Should the European Union Defend its Values?欧盟为何以及应如何捍卫其价值观?
Res Publica. 2023;29(1):69-88. doi: 10.1007/s11158-022-09560-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
The Shrinking of the European Union and Its Integration Potential.欧盟的萎缩及其一体化潜力
Her Russ Acad Sci. 2020;90(6):680-687. doi: 10.1134/S1019331620060040. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The Pandemic and the Transformation of Liberal International Order.大流行与自由国际秩序的转型
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):1-26. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09698-0. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验