Suppr超能文献

在进行同时训练时,采用阻力训练对比法并利用一分钟和四分钟恢复时间,不会对后续的跳跃表现产生负面影响。

Utilising one minute and four minute recovery when employing the resistance training contrast method does not negatively affect subsequent jump performance in the presence of concurrent training.

作者信息

Ritchie Dean, Keogh Justin W L, Reaburn Peter, Bartlett Jonathan D

机构信息

Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Gold Coast Suns FC, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2020 Oct 13;8:e10031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10031. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about contrast training and post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in a same day concurrent training model. The aim of the current study was to examine the use of two short duration (1-min and 4-min) recovery periods on drop jump performance in same day concurrently trained athletes.

METHODS

Ten professional Australian Rules footballers (age, 20.6 ± 1.9 yr; height, 184.8 ± 6.9 cm; body mass, 85.8 ± 8.4 kg) completed two resistance training sessions with different PAPE recovery durations; 1-min and 4-min, 1 h following a field-based endurance session. Baseline (pre) drop jumps were compared to post-test maximal drop jumps, performed after each set of three squats (where each participant was encouraged to lift as heavy as they could), to determine changes between 1-min and 4-min recovery periods. Data were analysed by fitting a mixed model (significance was set at ≤ 0.05). Corrected Hedges' g standardised effect sizes ±95% confidence limits were calculated using group means ± SDs.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between baseline and experimental sets 1, 2 and 3 for reactive strength index (RSI), flight time, and total and relative impulse for either recovery duration. However, for contact time, 1-min baseline was significantly different from set 2 (mean difference; 95% CI [0.029; 0.000-0.057 s], = 0.047, ES; 95% CI [-0.27; -1.20 to 0.66]). For RSI and flight time, 1-min was significantly higher than 4-min (RSI: 0.367; 0.091 to 0.642, = 0.010, ES; 95% CI [0.52; -0.37 to 1.42]; flight time: 0.033; 0.003 to 0.063 s, = 0.027, ES; 95% CI [0.86; -0.06 to 1.78]).

DISCUSSION

Short recovery periods of 1-min may be a time-efficient form of prescribing strength-power exercise in contrast loading schemes. Longer recovery periods do not appear to benefit immediate, subsequent performance.

摘要

背景

在同一天的同时训练模型中,关于对比训练和激活后性能增强(PAPE)的了解甚少。本研究的目的是检验在同一天同时训练的运动员中,两种短时长(1分钟和4分钟)恢复期对纵跳性能的影响。

方法

十名澳大利亚职业橄榄球运动员(年龄,20.6±1.9岁;身高,184.8±6.9厘米;体重,85.8±8.4千克)在一次基于场地的耐力训练后1小时,完成了两次不同PAPE恢复时长的阻力训练;1分钟和4分钟。将基线(训练前)纵跳与每组三次深蹲(鼓励每位参与者尽可能举重物)后的测试后最大纵跳进行比较,以确定1分钟和4分钟恢复期之间的变化。通过拟合混合模型(显著性设定为≤0.05)对数据进行分析。使用组均值±标准差计算校正后的Hedges' g标准化效应大小±95%置信区间。

结果

对于反应力量指数(RSI)、飞行时间以及两种恢复时长的总冲量和相对冲量,基线与实验组1、2和3之间均无显著差异。然而,对于接触时间,1分钟基线与第2组显著不同(平均差异;95%置信区间[0.029;0.000 - 0.057秒],P = 0.047,效应大小;95%置信区间[-0.27;-1.20至0.66])。对于RSI和飞行时间,1分钟显著高于4分钟(RSI:0.367;0.091至0.642,P = 0.010,效应大小;95%置信区间[0.52;-0.37至1.42];飞行时间:0.033;0.003至0.063秒,P = 0.027,效应大小;95%置信区间[0.86;-0.06至1.78])。

讨论

1分钟的短恢复期可能是在对比负荷方案中规定力量 - 功率训练的一种省时形式。较长的恢复期似乎对即时和后续表现没有益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a72/7566756/b619efa3beb3/peerj-08-10031-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验