• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健相关人工智能手稿作者的最佳实践。

Best practices for authors of healthcare-related artificial intelligence manuscripts.

作者信息

Kakarmath Sujay, Esteva Andre, Arnaout Rima, Harvey Hugh, Kumar Santosh, Muse Evan, Dong Feng, Wedlund Leia, Kvedar Joseph

机构信息

MGH & BWH Center for Clinical Data Science, Partners Healthcare, Boston, MA USA.

Department of Medical AI, Salesforce Research, Palo Alto, CA USA.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Oct 16;3:134. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00336-w. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-020-00336-w
PMID:33083569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7567805/
Abstract

Since its inception in 2017, has attracted a disproportionate number of manuscripts reporting on uses of artificial intelligence. This field has matured rapidly in the past several years. There was initial fascination with the algorithms themselves (machine learning, deep learning, convoluted neural networks) and the use of these algorithms to make predictions that often surpassed prevailing benchmarks. As the discipline has matured, individuals have called attention to aberrancies in the output of these algorithms. In particular, criticisms have been widely circulated that algorithmically developed models may have limited generalizability due to overfitting to the training data and may systematically perpetuate various forms of biases inherent in the training data, including race, gender, age, and health state or fitness level (Challen et al. BMJ Qual. Saf. 28:231-237, 2019; O'neil. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, Broadway Book, 2016). Given our interest in publishing the highest quality papers and the growing volume of submissions using AI algorithms, we offer a list of criteria that authors should consider before submitting papers to .

摘要

自2017年创立以来,已吸引了数量极不相称的关于人工智能应用的稿件。在过去几年中,这个领域迅速成熟。最初人们着迷于算法本身(机器学习、深度学习、卷积神经网络)以及使用这些算法进行预测,这些预测常常超过了现有的基准。随着该学科的成熟,人们开始关注这些算法输出中的异常情况。特别是,有广泛流传的批评称,通过算法开发的模型可能由于过度拟合训练数据而具有有限的通用性,并且可能会系统性地延续训练数据中固有的各种形式的偏差,包括种族、性别、年龄以及健康状况或 fitness 水平(Challen等人,《英国医学杂志·质量与安全》28:231 - 237,2019;奥尼尔,《数学毁灭武器:大数据如何加剧不平等并威胁民主》,百老汇图书,2016)。鉴于我们对发表最高质量论文的兴趣以及使用人工智能算法的投稿数量不断增加,我们提供了一份作者在向投稿前应考虑的标准清单。

相似文献

1
Best practices for authors of healthcare-related artificial intelligence manuscripts.医疗保健相关人工智能手稿作者的最佳实践。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Oct 16;3:134. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00336-w. eCollection 2020.
2
Mapping the Bibliometrics Landscape of AI in Medicine: Methodological Study.人工智能在医学中的文献计量学图谱绘制:方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 8;25:e45815. doi: 10.2196/45815.
3
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in emergency medicine.急诊医学中的人工智能与机器学习
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Dec;30(6):870-874. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13145. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
4
Implementing Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health in Resource-Limited Settings? Top 10 Lessons We Learned in Congenital Heart Defects and Cardiology.在资源有限的环境中实施人工智能和数字健康?我们在先天性心脏病和心脏病学中获得的十大经验教训。
OMICS. 2020 May;24(5):264-277. doi: 10.1089/omi.2019.0142. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
Integrating Artificial and Human Intelligence: A Partnership for Responsible Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Medicine.人工智能与人类智能的融合:生物医学工程和医学领域负责任创新的合作伙伴关系。
OMICS. 2020 May;24(5):247-263. doi: 10.1089/omi.2019.0038. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Deep convolutional neural network and IoT technology for healthcare.用于医疗保健的深度卷积神经网络和物联网技术。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 17;10:20552076231220123. doi: 10.1177/20552076231220123. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Big data and artificial intelligence application in energy field: a bibliometric analysis.大数据和人工智能在能源领域的应用:文献计量分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):13960-13973. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24880-y. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
9
AAPM task group report 273: Recommendations on best practices for AI and machine learning for computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging.AAPM 工作组报告 273:关于医学影像计算机辅助诊断中人工智能和机器学习的最佳实践建议。
Med Phys. 2023 Feb;50(2):e1-e24. doi: 10.1002/mp.16188. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
10
Shallow and deep learning classifiers in medical image analysis.医学图像分析中的浅层和深度学习分类器。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Mar 5;8(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00428-2.

引用本文的文献

1
An analytic research and review of the literature on practice of artificial intelligence in healthcare.关于人工智能在医疗保健领域应用的文献分析研究与综述。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 14;30(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02603-6.
2
Self-supervised learning for label-free segmentation in cardiac ultrasound.心脏超声中无标签分割的自监督学习
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 30;16(1):4070. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59451-5.
3
A systematic review of machine learning-based prognostic models for acute pancreatitis: Towards improving methods and reporting quality.基于机器学习的急性胰腺炎预后模型的系统评价:致力于改进方法和报告质量。
PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 24;22(2):e1004432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004432. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
A scoping review of large language model based approaches for information extraction from radiology reports.基于大语言模型从放射学报告中提取信息的方法的范围综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Aug 24;7(1):222. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01219-0.
5
Pitfalls in Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Cardiovascular Diseases: Challenge and Solutions.机器学习模型在预测心血管疾病中的陷阱:挑战与解决方案。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e47645. doi: 10.2196/47645.
6
Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review.人工智能在心血管疾病风险预测模型中的应用及独立验证筛选工具的开发:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 5;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03273-7.
7
The past, current, and future of neonatal intensive care units with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.人工智能在新生儿重症监护病房的过去、现状与未来:一项系统综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 27;6(1):220. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00941-5.
8
Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Modeling Studies: Development and Validation.用于预后和诊断机器学习建模研究的综合报告指南:制定和验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 31;25:e48763. doi: 10.2196/48763.
9
Predicting Hearing Loss in Testicular Cancer Patients after Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.预测接受顺铂化疗的睾丸癌患者的听力损失
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 1;15(15):3923. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153923.
10
Perspectives on validation of clinical predictive algorithms.临床预测算法的验证视角。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 May 6;6(1):86. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00832-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging.隐藏分层导致医学成像机器学习中具有临床意义的失败。
Proc ACM Conf Health Inference Learn (2020). 2020 Apr;2020:151-159. doi: 10.1145/3368555.3384468.
2
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.
3
Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics.校准:预测分析的阿喀琉斯之踵。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7.
4
How to Read Articles That Use Machine Learning: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.如何阅读使用机器学习的文章:医学文献的用户指南。
JAMA. 2019 Nov 12;322(18):1806-1816. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16489.
5
Impact of predictor measurement heterogeneity across settings on the performance of prediction models: A measurement error perspective.预测指标在不同环境下的变异性对预测模型性能的影响:测量误差的角度。
Stat Med. 2019 Aug 15;38(18):3444-3459. doi: 10.1002/sim.8183. Epub 2019 May 31.
6
Machine Learning for Prediction in Electronic Health Data.电子健康数据预测中的机器学习
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1404.
7
Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety.人工智能、偏差与临床安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):231-237. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
8
Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据的机器学习算法中的潜在偏差。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1544-1547. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763.
9
Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets.基于大型医疗保健数据集的深度学习模型基准测试。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:112-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine.机器学习在医学领域的意外后果。
JAMA. 2017 Aug 8;318(6):517-518. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7797.