Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析使用肾素-血管紧张素系统药物和 COVID-19 临床结局:迄今为止有哪些证据?

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of renin-angiotensin system drugs and COVID-19 clinical outcomes: What is the evidence so far?

机构信息

Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Kurdistan Region Government, Erbil, Iraq.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00666. doi: 10.1002/prp2.666.

Abstract

Conflicting evidence exists about the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID-19 clinical outcomes. We aimed to provide a comprehensive/updated evaluation of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19-related clinical outcomes, including exploration of interclass differences between ACEIs and ARBs, using a systematic review/meta-analysis approach conducted in Medline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, and medRxiv from inception to 22 May 2020. English studies that evaluated the effect of ACEIs/ARBs among patients with COVID-19 were included. Studies' quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were analyzed using the random-effects modeling stratified by exposure (ACEIs/ARBs, ACEIs, and ARBs). Heterogeneiity was assessed using I statistic. Several subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the impact of potential confounders. Overall, 27 studies were eligible. The pooled analyses showed nonsignificant associations between ACEIs/ARBs and death (OR:0.97, 95%CI:0.75,1.27), ICU admission (OR:1.09;95%CI:0.65,1.81), death/ICU admission (OR:0.67; 95%CI:0.52,0.86), risk of COVID-19 infection (OR:1.01; 95%CI:0.93,1.10), severe infection (OR:0.78; 95%CI:0.53,1.15), and hospitalization (OR:1.15; 95%CI:0.81,1.65). However, the subgroup analyses indicated significant association between ACEIs/ARBs and hospitalization among USA studies (OR:1.59; 95%CI:1.03,2.44), peer-reviewed (OR:1.93, 95%CI:1.38,2.71), good quality and studies which reported adjusted measure of effect (OR:1.30, 95%CI:1.10,1.50). Significant differences were found between ACEIs and ARBs with the latter being significantly associated with lower risk of acquiring COVID-19 infection (OR:0.24; 95%CI: 0.17,0.34). In conclusion, high-quality evidence exists for the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on some COVID-19 clinical outcomes. For the first time, we provided evidence, albeit of low quality, on interclass differences between ACEIs and ARBs for some of the reported clinical outcomes.

摘要

关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)对 COVID-19 临床结局的影响,存在相互矛盾的证据。我们旨在通过系统评价/荟萃分析方法,在 Medline(OVID)、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆和 medRxiv 中评估 ACEI/ARB 对 COVID-19 相关临床结局的影响,包括探索 ACEI 和 ARB 之间的类内差异,从成立到 2020 年 5 月 22 日。纳入评估 COVID-19 患者中 ACEI/ARB 影响的英语研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。使用基于暴露的随机效应模型(ACEI/ARB、ACEI 和 ARB)进行数据分析。使用 I 统计评估异质性。进行了几项亚组分析以探讨潜在混杂因素的影响。总体而言,有 27 项研究符合条件。汇总分析显示,ACEI/ARB 与死亡(OR:0.97,95%CI:0.75,1.27)、入住 ICU(OR:1.09;95%CI:0.65,1.81)、死亡/入住 ICU(OR:0.67;95%CI:0.52,0.86)、COVID-19 感染风险(OR:1.01;95%CI:0.93,1.10)、严重感染(OR:0.78;95%CI:0.53,1.15)和住院(OR:1.15;95%CI:0.81,1.65)之间无显著关联。然而,亚组分析表明,ACEI/ARB 与美国研究中的住院治疗(OR:1.59;95%CI:1.03,2.44)、同行评审(OR:1.93,95%CI:1.38,2.71)、高质量和报告调整效应衡量指标的研究之间存在显著关联(OR:1.30,95%CI:1.10,1.50)。ACEI 和 ARB 之间存在显著差异,后者与较低的 COVID-19 感染风险显著相关(OR:0.24;95%CI:0.17,0.34)。总之,高质量证据表明 ACEI/ARB 对某些 COVID-19 临床结局有影响。这是首次提供 ACEI 和 ARB 对某些报告的临床结局的类内差异的证据,尽管质量较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7522/7575889/28622465efb2/PRP2-8-e00666-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验