Suppr超能文献

口腔内超声检查在口腔鳞状细胞癌中 DOl 评估中的应用:与磁共振成像和组织病理学的比较。

Intraoral ultrasonography in the assessment of DOI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance and histopathology.

机构信息

IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.

Interdisciplinary Department of Surgical and Integrated Diagnostic Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Aug;278(8):2943-2952. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06421-w. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The first-line therapeutic approach for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is complete surgical resection. Preoperative assessment of depth of invasion (cDOI) is crucial to plan the surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) and intraoral ultrasonography (IOUS) have been shown to be useful tools for assessment of DOI. The present analysis investigates the accuracy of MR and IOUS in evaluating DOI in OCSCC compared to histological evaluation (pDOI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine previously untreated patients with cT1-T3 OCSCC were reviewed. Nine patients were staged with MR alone, 10 with IOUS alone, and 30 with both MR and IOUS.

RESULTS

Mean difference between cDOI and pDOI values of 0.2 mm (95% CI - 1.0-1.3 mm) and between cDOI and pDOI of 0.3 mm (95% CI - 1.0-1.6 mm). Spearman R between cDOI and pDOI was R = 0.83 and between cDOI and pDOI was R = 0.76. Both radiological techniques showed high performance for the correct identification, with the optimum cut-off of 5 mm, of patients with a pDOI ≥ 4 mm and amenable to a neck dissection, with an AUC of 0.92 and 0.82 for MR and IOUS, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both examinations were valid approaches for preoperative determination of DOI in OCSCC, although with different cost-effectiveness profiles and indications.

摘要

目的

口腔鳞状细胞癌(OCSCC)的一线治疗方法是完全手术切除。术前评估浸润深度(cDOI)对于手术计划至关重要。磁共振(MR)和口腔内超声(IOUS)已被证明是评估 DOI 的有用工具。本分析调查了 MR 和 IOUS 与组织学评估(pDOI)相比在评估 OCSCC 中的 DOI 的准确性。

材料和方法

回顾了 49 例未经治疗的 cT1-T3 OCSCC 患者。9 例患者单独接受 MR 分期,10 例患者单独接受 IOUS 分期,30 例患者同时接受 MR 和 IOUS 分期。

结果

cDOI 和 pDOI 值的平均差值为 0.2mm(95%CI -1.0-1.3mm),cDOI 和 pDOI 值的平均差值为 0.3mm(95%CI -1.0-1.6mm)。cDOI 和 pDOI 之间的 Spearman R 为 R=0.83,cDOI 和 pDOI 之间的 Spearman R 为 R=0.76。两种影像学技术在正确识别 pDOI≥4mm 且适合行颈清扫术的患者方面均表现出较高的性能,AUC 分别为 0.92 和 0.82。

结论

两种检查方法均可作为 OCSCC 术前评估 DOI 的有效方法,尽管其成本效益和适应证不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cc2/8266699/95e56dfa26e8/405_2020_6421_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验