• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Current trend of accreditation within medical education.当前医学教育认证的趋势。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:30. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
The WFME global standards for quality improvement of postgraduate medical education: Which standards are also applicable in Germany? Recommendations for physicians with a license for postgraduate training and training agents.世界医学教育联合会本科医学教育全球标准:哪些标准也适用于德国?对具有研究生培训和培训代理许可证的医生的建议。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Sep 15;39(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma001563. eCollection 2022.
3
Challenges for implementing WFME standards for accreditation in health professions education in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review.在中低收入国家实施卫生专业教育认证 WFME 标准的挑战:范围综述。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Mar;71(3):966-976. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.795.
4
Quality assurance of medical education: Lessons learned from use and analysis of the WFME global standards.医学教育质量保障:运用和分析 WFME 全球标准的经验教训。
Med Teach. 2019 Jun;41(6):650-655. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1536259. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
World Federation for Medical Education Policy on international recognition of medical schools' programme.世界医学教育联合会关于医学院校课程国际认可的政策。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008 Dec;37(12):1041-3.
6
A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education standards. WFME 2: educational program.医学教育标准使用实用指南。WFME2:教育计划。
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Dec;179(4):489-91. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0574-3. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
7
Public availability of information from WFME-recognized accreditation agencies.世界医学教育联合会认可的认证机构信息的公开提供。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Jun 29;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00621-z.
8
International recognition of basic medical education programmes.基础医学教育项目的国际认可。
Med Educ. 2008 Jan;42(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02907.x.
9
Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME.医学教育的全球标准与认证:世界医学教育联合会的观点
Acad Med. 2006 Dec;81(12 Suppl):S43-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000243383.71047.c4.
10
Social accountability of medical education: aspects on global accreditation.医学教育的社会责任:全球认证方面。
Med Teach. 2011;33(8):667-72. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.590246.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Students' Perception of Educational Environment in a Newly Established Institute of National Importance in Eastern Uttar Pradesh: A Cross-Sectional, Questionnaire-Based Study.北方邦东部一所新成立的具有国家重要地位的学院中,医学生对教育环境的认知:一项基于问卷调查的横断面研究
Cureus. 2025 May 30;17(5):e85092. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85092. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Development, implementation, and evaluation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for medical radiation technologists in Taiwan: a nationwide experience.开发、实施和评估台湾医学放射技师的可委托专业活动(EPAs):一项全国性经验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05088-9.
3
Impact of external accreditation on students' performance: Insights from a full accreditation cycle.外部认证对学生表现的影响:来自一个完整认证周期的见解。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 25;9(5):e15815. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15815. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation.韩国医学教育评价院对医学院校进行第二次认证周期相关的认证标准项目。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Mar;35(1):1-7. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.244. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
5
The WFME global standards for quality improvement of postgraduate medical education: Which standards are also applicable in Germany? Recommendations for physicians with a license for postgraduate training and training agents.世界医学教育联合会本科医学教育全球标准:哪些标准也适用于德国?对具有研究生培训和培训代理许可证的医生的建议。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Sep 15;39(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma001563. eCollection 2022.
6
Public availability of information from officially accredited medical schools in China.中国官方认可的医学院校信息公开。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 31;22(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03491-8.
7
Effective Collaboration Through Activity Theory and Knotworking in Clinical Settings.通过活动理论和临床环境中的节点工作实现有效协作。
Cureus. 2021 Nov 24;13(11):e19860. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19860. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Special reviews on the history and future of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation to memorialize its collaboration with the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute to designate JEEHP as a co-official journal.关于韩国医学教育与评估研究所的历史与未来的特别回顾,以纪念其与韩国卫生人员执照考试研究所合作将《东亚卫生政策与管理杂志》指定为共同官方期刊。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:33. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.33. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The Association Between Learning Climate and Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes in 16 Nontertiary Obstetrics-Gynecology Departments in the Netherlands.荷兰16家非三级妇产科科室的学习氛围与不良产科结局之间的关联
Acad Med. 2017 Dec;92(12):1740-1748. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001964.
2
Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: Benefits and challenges.本科医学教育认证体系中的持续质量改进:益处与挑战。
Med Teach. 2015;37(11):1032-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031735. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Spending patterns in region of residency training and subsequent expenditures for care provided by practicing physicians for Medicare beneficiaries.住院医师培训地区的支出模式以及随后执业医师为 Medicare 受益人为提供的护理支出。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2385-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15973.
4
The association between residency training and internists' ability to practice conservatively.住院医师培训与内科医生实施保守治疗能力之间的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1640-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3337.
5
Transforming emergency care for older adults.老年患者急诊护理的转变。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Dec;32(12):2116-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0670.
6
Interprofessional education accreditation standards in the USA: a comparative analysis.美国的跨专业教育认证标准:比较分析。
J Interprof Care. 2013 Mar;27(2):123-30. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2012.718295. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
7
Medical education accreditation in Mexico and the Philippines: impact on student outcomes.墨西哥和菲律宾的医学教育认证:对学生成果的影响。
Med Educ. 2012 Jun;46(6):586-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04212.x.
8
Competency-based medical education: theory to practice.基于能力的医学教育:理论与实践。
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-45. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190.
9
Evaluating obstetrical residency programs using patient outcomes.利用患者结局评估产科住院医师培训项目。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 23;302(12):1277-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1356.
10
Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME.医学教育的全球标准与认证:世界医学教育联合会的观点
Acad Med. 2006 Dec;81(12 Suppl):S43-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000243383.71047.c4.

当前医学教育认证的趋势。

Current trend of accreditation within medical education.

机构信息

Professor Emeritus, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:30. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

DOI:10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30
PMID:33085997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7605903/
Abstract

Currently, accreditation in medical education is a priority for many countries worldwide. The World Federation for Medical Education’s (WFME) launch of its 1st trilogy of standards in 2003 was a seminal event promoting accreditation in basic medical education (BME) globally. In parallel, the WFME also actively spearheaded a project to recognize accrediting agencies within individual countries. The introduction of competency-based medical education (CBME), with the 2 key concepts of entrusted professional activity and milestones, has enabled researchers to identify the relationships between patient outcomes and medical education. The recent data-driven approach to CBME has been used for ongoing quality improvement of trainees and training programs. The accreditation goal has shifted from the single purpose of quality assurance to balancing quality assurance and quality improvement. Although there are many types of postgraduate medical education (PGME), it may be possible to accredit resident programs on a global scale by adopting the concept of CBME. It will also be possible to achieve accreditation alignment for BME and PGME, which center on competency. This approach may also make it possible to measure accreditation outcomes against patient outcomes. Therefore, evidence of the advantages of costly and labor-consuming accreditation processes will be available soon, and quality improvement will be the driving force of the accreditation process.

摘要

目前,医学教育认证是许多国家的优先事项。世界医学教育联合会(WFME)于 2003 年发布了其第一部三部曲标准,这是在全球范围内推动基础医学教育(BME)认证的一个重要事件。与此同时,WFME 还积极推动了一个在各个国家认可认证机构的项目。以委托专业活动和里程碑为核心概念的以能力为基础的医学教育(CBME)的引入,使研究人员能够确定患者结果与医学教育之间的关系。最近,采用数据驱动的方法进行 CBME 已用于不断改进学员和培训计划的质量。认证目标已经从单一的质量保证目的转变为平衡质量保证和质量改进。尽管有许多类型的研究生医学教育(PGME),但通过采用 CBME 的概念,有可能在全球范围内对住院医师培训项目进行认证。也有可能实现以能力为核心的 BME 和 PGME 的认证一致性。这种方法还可能使我们能够根据患者结果来衡量认证结果。因此,昂贵且耗时的认证过程的优势的证据很快就会出现,而质量改进将成为认证过程的驱动力。