• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态脑电图分析在语言理解过程中揭示了感知处理和句子预期之间的互动级联。

Dynamic EEG analysis during language comprehension reveals interactive cascades between perceptual processing and sentential expectations.

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, 356 Medical Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States.

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, W311 Seashore Hall, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2020 Dec;211:104875. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104875. Epub 2020 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104875
PMID:33086178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7682806/
Abstract

Understanding spoken language requires analysis of the rapidly unfolding speech signal at multiple levels: acoustic, phonological, and semantic. However, there is not yet a comprehensive picture of how these levels relate. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while listeners (N = 31) heard sentences in which we manipulated acoustic ambiguity (e.g., a bees/peas continuum) and sentential expectations (e.g., Honey is made by bees). EEG was analyzed with a mixed effects model over time to quantify how language processing cascades proceed on a millisecond-by-millisecond basis. Our results indicate: (1) perceptual processing and memory for fine-grained acoustics is preserved in brain activity for up to 900 msec; (2) contextual analysis begins early and is graded with respect to the acoustic signal; and (3) top-down predictions influence perceptual processing in some cases, however, these predictions are available simultaneously with the veridical signal. These mechanistic insights provide a basis for a better understanding of the cortical language network.

摘要

理解口语需要在多个层次上分析快速展开的语音信号

声学、音韵和语义。然而,目前还没有一个全面的画面,说明这些层次是如何相关的。我们在听众(N=31)听到句子时记录了脑电图(EEG),我们在这些句子中操纵了声学歧义(例如,蜜蜂/豌豆连续体)和句子预期(例如,蜂蜜是由蜜蜂制成的)。我们使用混合效应模型随着时间的推移进行 EEG 分析,以量化语言处理在毫秒级的基础上是如何进行的。我们的研究结果表明:(1)在大脑活动中,对细微声音的感知处理和记忆可以保留长达 900 毫秒;(2)语境分析很早就开始了,并且与声学信号有关;(3)自上而下的预测在某些情况下会影响感知处理,但这些预测与真实信号同时存在。这些机制上的见解为更好地理解皮质语言网络提供了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/53919324020a/nihms-1638926-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/f3b7b5b7a835/nihms-1638926-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/01d9d69afb75/nihms-1638926-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/23e9f35c0b0d/nihms-1638926-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/53919324020a/nihms-1638926-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/f3b7b5b7a835/nihms-1638926-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/01d9d69afb75/nihms-1638926-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/23e9f35c0b0d/nihms-1638926-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc3/7682806/53919324020a/nihms-1638926-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic EEG analysis during language comprehension reveals interactive cascades between perceptual processing and sentential expectations.动态脑电图分析在语言理解过程中揭示了感知处理和句子预期之间的互动级联。
Brain Lang. 2020 Dec;211:104875. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104875. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
2
Semantic Context Enhances the Early Auditory Encoding of Natural Speech.语义语境增强了对自然语音的早期听觉编码。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7564-7575. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0584-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
How long-term memory and accentuation interact during spoken language comprehension.在口语理解过程中,长期记忆和强调如何相互作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Apr;51(5):967-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
4
Balancing Prediction and Sensory Input in Speech Comprehension: The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Recognition in Context.在言语理解中平衡预测和感觉输入:语境中单词识别的时空动态。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 16;39(3):519-527. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3573-17.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
Predictive Brain Mechanisms in Sound-to-Meaning Mapping during Speech Processing.言语处理过程中从声音到意义映射的预测性脑机制。
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 19;36(42):10813-10822. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0583-16.2016.
6
Neural dynamics of semantic composition.语义组合的神经动力学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):21318-21327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903402116. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
The interplay between semantic and phonological constraints during spoken-word comprehension.口语单词理解过程中语义和语音限制之间的相互作用。
Psychophysiology. 2015 Jan;52(1):46-58. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12285. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
8
How and when accentuation influences temporally selective attention and subsequent semantic processing during on-line spoken language comprehension: an ERP study.重音如何以及何时影响在线口语理解过程中的时间选择性注意和随后的语义加工:一项 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1882-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
9
The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity.言语理解的神经机制:语义歧义的功能磁共振成像研究
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1261-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi009. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
10
The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.事件相关电位揭示语义和句法语境约束对口语理解中词汇选择与整合的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):1068-84. doi: 10.1162/0898929041502670.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoupling speech processing from time.将语音处理与时间解耦。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.05.017.
2
Timecourse of bottom-up and top-down language processing during a picture-based semantic priming task.基于图片的语义启动任务中自下而上和自上而下语言加工的时间进程。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2025;40(1):122-144. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2024.2409136. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
Linguistic diversity shapes flexible speech perception in school age children.语言多样性塑造了学龄儿童灵活的言语感知能力。

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting when timeseries differ: Using the Bootstrapped Differences of Timeseries (BDOTS) to analyze Visual World Paradigm data (and more).检测时间序列何时不同:使用时间序列的自举差异(BDOTS)分析视觉世界范式数据(及更多)。
J Mem Lang. 2018 Oct;102:55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 25.
2
Semantic Context Enhances the Early Auditory Encoding of Natural Speech.语义语境增强了对自然语音的早期听觉编码。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7564-7575. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0584-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Electrophysiological Evidence for Top-Down Lexical Influences on Early Speech Perception.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80430-1.
4
Individual differences in the perception of phonetic category structure predict speech-in-noise performance.个体在感知语音范畴结构方面的差异预测了在噪声环境下的言语表现。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Sep 1;156(3):1707-1719. doi: 10.1121/10.0028583.
5
Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech.连续与分类听力策略对噪声减损语音神经编码与感知的功能益处。
Brain Res. 2024 Dec 1;1844:149166. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149166. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
6
Understanding language processing in variable populations on their own terms: Towards a functionalist psycholinguistics of individual differences, development, and disorders.从其自身角度理解不同人群的语言处理:迈向关于个体差异、发展和障碍的功能主义心理语言学。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2023 Jul;44(4):565-592. doi: 10.1017/s0142716423000255. Epub 2023 May 11.
7
Individual differences in the use of top-down versus bottom-up cues to resolve phonetic ambiguity.个体差异在使用自上而下和自下而上的线索来解决语音歧义方面的应用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1724-1734. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02889-4. Epub 2024 May 29.
8
Acoustic and language-specific sources for phonemic abstraction from speech.语音中音位抽象的声学和语言特异性来源。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 23;15(1):677. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44844-9.
9
Immediate neural impact and incomplete compensation after semantic hub disconnection.语义中枢连接中断后的即时神经影响和不完全补偿。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 7;14(1):6264. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42088-7.
10
The myth of categorical perception.范畴知觉的神话。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Dec;152(6):3819. doi: 10.1121/10.0016614.
电生理学证据表明,词汇的自上而下的影响作用于早期言语感知。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jun;30(6):830-841. doi: 10.1177/0956797619841813. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
4
In Spoken Word Recognition, the Future Predicts the Past.在口语识别中,未来预示着过去。
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 29;38(35):7585-7599. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
Electrophysiological Correlates of Semantic Dissimilarity Reflect the Comprehension of Natural, Narrative Speech.语义相似度的电生理相关性反映了对自然、叙事性言语的理解。
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):803-809.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.080. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
6
Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.评估音素分类中梯度的来源和功能:一种个体差异方法。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Sep;43(9):1594-1611. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000410. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Prediction Errors but Not Sharpened Signals Simulate Multivoxel fMRI Patterns during Speech Perception.预测误差而非增强信号在言语感知过程中模拟多体素功能磁共振成像模式。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Nov 15;14(11):e1002577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002577. eCollection 2016 Nov.
8
Sentential influences on acoustic-phonetic processing: A Granger causality analysis of multimodal imaging data.句子对声学语音处理的影响:多模态成像数据的格兰杰因果分析
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(7):841-855. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1029498. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
9
Detecting time-specific differences between temporal nonlinear curves: Analyzing data from the visual world paradigm.检测时间非线性曲线之间的特定时间差异:分析来自视觉世界范式的数据。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2708-2725. doi: 10.1177/0962280215607411. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
10
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects.认知不会影响感知:评估“自上而下”效应的证据。
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e229. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965. Epub 2015 Jul 20.