Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg 20146, Germany
Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück 49069, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2020 Nov 18;40(47):9088-9102. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0581-19.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
Oscillatory α-band activity is commonly associated with spatial attention and multisensory prioritization. It has also been suggested to reflect the automatic transformation of tactile stimuli from a skin-based, somatotopic reference frame into an external one. Previous research has not convincingly separated these two possible roles of α-band activity. Previous experimental paradigms have used artificially long delays between tactile stimuli and behavioral responses to aid relating oscillatory activity to these different events. However, this strategy potentially blurs the temporal relationship of α-band activity relative to behavioral indicators of tactile-spatial transformations. Here, we assessed α-band modulation with massive univariate deconvolution, an analysis approach that disentangles brain signals overlapping in time and space. Thirty-one male and female human participants performed a delay-free, visual search task in which saccade behavior was unrestricted. A tactile cue to uncrossed or crossed hands was either informative or uninformative about visual target location. α-Band suppression following tactile stimulation was lateralized relative to the stimulated hand over central-parietal electrodes but relative to its external location over parieto-occipital electrodes. α-Band suppression reflected external touch location only after informative cues, suggesting that posterior α-band lateralization does not index automatic tactile transformation. Moreover, α-band suppression occurred at the time of, or after, the production of the saccades guided by tactile stimulation. These findings challenge the idea that α-band activity is directly involved in tactile-spatial transformation and suggest instead that it reflects delayed, supramodal processes related to attentional reorienting. Localizing a touch in space requires integrating somatosensory information about skin location and proprioceptive or visual information about posture. The automatic remapping between skin-based tactile information to a location in external space has been proposed to rely on the modulation of oscillatory brain activity in the α-band range, across the multiple cortical areas that are involved in tactile, multisensory, and spatial processing. We report two findings that are inconsistent with this view. First, α-band activity reflected the remapped stimulus location only when touch was task relevant. Second, α-band modulation occurred too late to account for spatially directed behavioral responses and, thus, only after remapping must have taken place. These characteristics contradict the idea that α-band directly reflects automatic tactile remapping processes.
振荡的α 波段活动通常与空间注意和多感觉优先化有关。它也被认为反映了触觉刺激从基于皮肤的、体感觉参照系自动转换为外部参照系的过程。之前的研究并没有令人信服地将 α 波段活动的这两种可能作用区分开来。之前的实验范式使用人为的长延迟来分隔触觉刺激和行为反应,以帮助将振荡活动与这些不同的事件联系起来。然而,这种策略可能会模糊 α 波段活动相对于触觉-空间转换的行为指标的时间关系。在这里,我们使用大规模单变量去卷积评估α 波段调制,这是一种分析方法,可以分离在时间和空间上重叠的大脑信号。31 名男性和女性人类参与者执行了一个没有延迟的视觉搜索任务,在这个任务中,扫视行为不受限制。一个触觉提示指示手是交叉的还是不交叉的,这个提示要么对视觉目标位置有信息,要么没有信息。触觉刺激后,α 波段的抑制在中央顶叶电极上相对于受刺激的手是偏侧化的,但在顶枕叶电极上相对于其外部位置是偏侧化的。只有在信息提示后,α 波段的抑制才反映了外部触摸位置,这表明后部α 波段的偏侧化并不代表自动触觉转换。此外,α 波段的抑制发生在由触觉刺激引导的扫视产生之时或之后。这些发现挑战了 α 波段活动直接参与触觉-空间转换的观点,并表明它反映了与注意力重新定向相关的延迟的、超模态过程。在空间中定位一个触摸需要整合关于皮肤位置的体感信息和关于姿势的本体感觉或视觉信息。自动将基于皮肤的触觉信息映射到外部空间中的位置被认为依赖于振荡脑活动在α 波段范围内的调制,这种调制跨越了参与触觉、多感觉和空间处理的多个皮质区域。我们报告了两个与这一观点不一致的发现。首先,只有当触摸与任务相关时,α 波段活动才反映了重新映射的刺激位置。其次,α 波段调制发生得太晚,无法解释空间定向的行为反应,因此,只有在重新映射已经发生之后才会发生。这些特征与α 波段直接反映自动触觉重映射过程的观点相矛盾。