Suppr超能文献

跨模态视觉预测会引起空间特异性的早期视觉皮层活动,但比真实视觉刺激要晚。

Crossmodal visual predictions elicit spatially specific early visual cortex activity but later than real visual stimuli.

机构信息

Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, Hamburg University, Von-Melle-Park 11, Hamburg 20148, Germany.

LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad 500 034, Inida.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 25;378(1886):20220339. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0339. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that crossmodal visual predictions are instrumental in controlling early visual cortex activity. The exact time course and spatial precision of such crossmodal top-down influences on the visual cortex have been unknown. In the present study, participants were exposed to audiovisual combinations comprising one of two sounds and a Gabor patch either in the top left or in the bottom right visual field. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to these frequent crossmodal combinations (standards) as well as to trials in which the visual stimulus was omitted (omissions) or the visual and auditory stimuli were recombined (deviants). Standards and deviants elicited an ERP between 50 and 100 ms of opposite polarity known as the C1 effect commonly associated with retinotopic processing in early visual cortex. By contrast, a C1 effect was not observed in omission trials. Spatially specific omission and mismatch effects (deviants minus standards) started only later with a latency of 230 ms and 170 ms, respectively. These results suggest that crossmodal visual predictions control visual cortex activity in a spatially specific manner. However, visual predictions do not modulate visual cortex activity with the same timing as visual stimulation activates these areas but rather seem to involve distinct neural mechanisms. This article is part of the theme issue 'Decision and control processes in multisensory perception'.

摘要

先前的研究表明,跨模态视觉预测对于控制早期视觉皮层活动至关重要。然而,这种跨模态自上而下的影响在视觉皮层中的精确时间进程和空间精度尚不清楚。在本研究中,参与者暴露于视听组合中,这些组合包括两种声音中的一种和一个 Gabor 补丁,分别位于左上方或右下方的视野中。对这些频繁的跨模态组合(标准)以及视觉刺激被省略(省略)或视觉和听觉刺激被重新组合(偏差)的试验记录事件相关电位(ERP)。标准和偏差在 50 到 100 毫秒之间产生相反极性的 ERP,称为 C1 效应,通常与早期视觉皮层中的视网膜处理有关。相比之下,在省略试验中未观察到 C1 效应。空间特异性的省略和不匹配效应(偏差减去标准)分别在 230 毫秒和 170 毫秒后才开始出现。这些结果表明,跨模态视觉预测以空间特异性的方式控制视觉皮层的活动。然而,视觉预测不会以与视觉刺激激活这些区域相同的时间来调制视觉皮层活动,而是似乎涉及不同的神经机制。本文是主题问题“多感官感知中的决策和控制过程”的一部分。

相似文献

2
Joint Encoding of Auditory Timing and Location in Visual Cortex.视觉皮层中听觉时间和位置的联合编码。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jul;31(7):1002-1017. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01399. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
4
Visual omitted stimulus potentials are not retinotopic.视觉缺失刺激电位没有视网膜定位特性。
Neurosci Lett. 2024 May 1;830:137777. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2024.137777. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
How the brain controls decision making in a multisensory world.大脑如何在多感官世界中控制决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 25;378(1886):20220332. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0332. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
What You See Is What You Hear: Sounds Alter the Contents of Visual Perception.所见即所闻:声音改变视觉感知的内容。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Dec;33(12):2109-2122. doi: 10.1177/09567976221121348. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
6
The Perceptual Prediction Paradox.感知预测悖论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;24(1):13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验