• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同充填技术和封闭剂对根管再治疗期间充填材料去除的影响。

Effect of different obturating techniques and sealers on the removal of filling materials during endodontic retreatment.

作者信息

Athkuri Srividya, Mandava Jyothi, Chalasani Uma, Ravi Ravi Chandra, Munagapati Vamsi Krishna, Chennareddy Anusha Reddy

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, GITAM Dental College and Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2019 Nov-Dec;22(6):578-582. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_241_19. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

DOI:10.4103/JCD.JCD_241_19
PMID:33088069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7542081/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate removal of previous root filling materials is an important objective during endodontic retreatment.

AIM

This study was aimed to evaluate the influence of obturation quality and sealer type on the removal of root filling materials during endodontic retreatment using micro-computed tomography (μ-CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety extracted mandibular premolars were randomly assigned to two groups ( = 45) based on the type of sealer (AH Plus and BioRoot RCS) and three sub-groups based on the obturating technique used, i.e., cold lateral condensation, warm vertical compaction, and thermoplasticized injectable techniques. Specimens were scanned using μ-CT before and after retreatment to assess the amount of filling material, and time taken for removal was recorded.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple test at 5% significance level.

RESULTS

Filling debris percentage and retreatment time were not significantly affected by the type of sealer ( ≥ 0.05). The percentage of remaining filling material was higher in teeth obturated with thermoplasticized technique ( < 0.05). Significantly more filling material debris was observed in apical third ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of obturating technique used for initial root canal treatment has influenced the amount of remaining filling material and retreatment time. Retreatability of the BioRoot RCS sealer was similar to the AH Plus sealer.

摘要

背景

在根管再治疗过程中,充分去除先前的根管充填材料是一个重要目标。

目的

本研究旨在使用微计算机断层扫描(μ-CT)评估充填质量和封闭剂类型对根管再治疗过程中根管充填材料去除的影响。

材料与方法

根据封闭剂类型(AH Plus和BioRoot RCS)将90颗拔除的下颌前磨牙随机分为两组(每组n = 45),并根据所使用的充填技术分为三个亚组,即冷侧方加压充填、热垂直加压充填和热塑注射技术。在再治疗前后使用μ-CT对标本进行扫描,以评估充填材料的量,并记录去除所需时间。

统计分析

采用双向方差分析和Tukey多重检验对数据进行分析,显著性水平为5%。

结果

封闭剂类型对充填碎屑百分比和再治疗时间无显著影响(P≥0.05)。热塑注射技术充填的牙齿中剩余充填材料的百分比更高(P<0.05)。根尖三分之一处观察到的充填材料碎屑明显更多(P<0.05)。

结论

初始根管治疗所使用的充填技术类型影响了剩余充填材料的量和再治疗时间。BioRoot RCS封闭剂的再治疗可行性与AH Plus封闭剂相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1c/7542081/42453f29cdd1/JCD-22-578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1c/7542081/42453f29cdd1/JCD-22-578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1c/7542081/42453f29cdd1/JCD-22-578-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of different obturating techniques and sealers on the removal of filling materials during endodontic retreatment.不同充填技术和封闭剂对根管再治疗期间充填材料去除的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Nov-Dec;22(6):578-582. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_241_19. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
Comparative evaluation of retreatability of bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS) and epoxy resin (AH Plus) sealer with two different retreatment files: An study.使用两种不同再治疗锉对生物陶瓷封闭剂(BioRoot RCS)和环氧树脂封闭剂(AH Plus)再治疗性能的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):88-93. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_657_20. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Retreatability of BC Sealer and AH Plus root canal sealers using new supplementary instrumentation protocol during non-surgical endodontic retreatment.在非手术根管再治疗中使用新的补充仪器规程对 BC 密封剂和 AH Plus 根管密封剂进行可退缩性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):891-899. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03376-4. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
4
Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments.四种不同根管器械对 3 种含硅酸钙类根管封闭剂和 1 种环氧树脂类根管封闭剂的可取出性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2156-5. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study.不同锉在模拟根管再治疗中去除不同封闭剂的比较疗效——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC130-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17731.7845. Epub 2016 May 1.
6
Evaluation of the efficacy of TruNatomy, ProTaper retreatment, and RaCe file systems in retreatment of moderately curved mandibular molars: An study.TruNatomy、ProTaper再治疗和RaCe锉系统在中度弯曲下颌磨牙再治疗中的疗效评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023 Jul-Aug;26(4):383-387. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_143_23. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
7
Influence of obturation technique on penetration depth and adaptation of a bioceramic root canal sealer.根管充填技术对生物陶瓷根管封闭剂渗透深度及适应性的影响
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;23(5):505-511. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_450_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption.评价三种不同镍钛器械系统和手用器械在有模拟根尖吸收根管内去除根管充填材料时的根尖碎屑推出量。
Int Endod J. 2020 Mar;53(3):403-409. doi: 10.1111/iej.13234. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
9
A micro-computed tomographic study of remaining filling materials of two bioceramic sealers and epoxy resin sealer after retreatment.再治疗后两种生物陶瓷封闭剂和环氧树脂封闭剂剩余充填材料的微型计算机断层扫描研究
Restor Dent Endod. 2019 Apr 26;44(2):e18. doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e18. eCollection 2019 May.
10
Retreatability of Bioceramic Sealer Using One Curve Rotary File Assessed by Microcomputed Tomography.采用单曲线旋转锉评估生物陶瓷封闭剂的可退缩性:微计算机断层扫描研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Oct 1;22(10):1175-1183.

引用本文的文献

1
Endodontic retreatment of curved canals using Reciproc, Hyflex CM and Prodesign Duo Hybrid Systems.使用Reciproc、Hyflex CM和Prodesign Duo Hybrid系统对弯曲根管进行根管再治疗。
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Jun 2;39:e061. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.061. eCollection 2025.
2
Sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid.三种生物陶瓷封闭剂在模拟体液中浸泡后采用基于封闭剂的充填方法的封闭能力。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;28(2):199-203. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_605_24. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
Evaluating the Retreatability of Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer Using Root Canal Instrumentation-An Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of the ProTaper retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta-percha from curved root canals assessed by micro-CT.采用微 CT 评估 ProTaper 再治疗系统去除弯曲根管中 Thermafil、GuttaCore 或垂直压缩牙胶的效果。
Int Endod J. 2018 Jul;51(7):808-815. doi: 10.1111/iej.12893. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
2
Effect of Post Space Preparation on Apical Obturation Quality of Teeth Obturated with Different Techniques: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study.不同技术根管充填后牙根管预备对根尖封闭质量的影响:显微 CT 研究。
J Endod. 2017 Jul;43(7):1152-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.039. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
使用根管器械评估水硬性硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的可取出性——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3544-S3546. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1099_24. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
4
Root canal cleanliness and debris extrusion following retreatment of thermoplastic injection technique and bioceramic-based root canal sealer.热塑注射技术和基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂再治疗后的根管清洁度和碎屑挤出。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 23;28(11):608. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06005-6.
5
Effect of the filling technique on the filling removal from oval-shaped canals.充填技术对椭圆形根管内充填物去除的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jul 27;28(8):453. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05853-6.
6
Retreatability of NeoSEALER Flo obturated with warm vertical compaction versus single-cone technique using two different retreatment systems.使用两种不同再治疗系统,比较热垂直加压充填法与单尖法充填NeoSEALER Flo后的可再治疗性。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):286-292. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_314_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
Root canal retreatment of root canals filled with "Neo MTA 2" and epoxy resin, using continuous and asymmetric reciprocal rotation systems: study.使用连续和不对称往复旋转系统对填充有“Neo MTA 2”和环氧树脂的根管进行根管再治疗:研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e166-e171. doi: 10.4317/jced.61266. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Retreatment Strategies for Cases Containing Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Comprehensive Review.含硅酸钙类根管封闭剂病例的再治疗策略:一项综述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 18;12(2):41. doi: 10.3390/dj12020041.
9
Innovative exploration: A comparative study of novel approaches of root canal filling material removal efficiency.创新性探索:根管充填材料去除效率新方法的比较研究
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023 Nov-Dec;26(6):713-718. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_162_23. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
10
Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in Retreatment of Bioactive and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers.往复式器械在再治疗生物活性和树脂类根管封闭剂中的疗效。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022 Dec;56(4):338-350. doi: 10.15644/asc56/4/1.
The Efficacy of the WaveOne Reciprocating File System versus the ProTaper Retreatment System in Endodontic Retreatment of Two Different Obturating Techniques.
WaveOne往复式锉系统与ProTaper再治疗系统在两种不同充填技术根管再治疗中的疗效比较
J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):1011-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
4
Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison.两种根管封闭剂EndoSequence BC封闭剂和AH Plus的可再治疗性:显微计算机断层扫描比较
Restor Dent Endod. 2017 Feb;42(1):19-26. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.19. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
5
Efficacy of ProTaper and Mtwo Retreatment Files in Removal of Gutta-percha and GuttaFlow from Root Canals.ProTaper和Mtwo再治疗锉在去除根管内牙胶和GuttaFlow方面的疗效
Iran Endod J. 2016 Summer;11(3):184-7. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 May 1.
6
The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study.不同锉在模拟根管再治疗中去除不同封闭剂的比较疗效——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC130-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17731.7845. Epub 2016 May 1.
7
Micro-Computed Tomography Study of Filling Material Removal from Oval-shaped Canals by Using Rotary, Reciprocating, and Adaptive Motion Systems.使用旋转、往复和自适应运动系统从椭圆形根管中去除充填材料的微计算机断层扫描研究
J Endod. 2016 May;42(5):793-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
8
Efficacy of Combined Use of Different Nickel-Titanium Files on Removing Root Canal Filling Materials.不同镍钛锉联合使用对去除根管充填材料的疗效
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.019. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
9
Evaluation of the Efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc File Systems in the Removal of Root Filling Material: An Ex Vivo Micro-Computed Tomographic Study.经直肠超声引导下的TRUShape和往复锉系统在去除根管充填材料中的疗效评估:一项体外微型计算机断层扫描研究
J Endod. 2016 Feb;42(2):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers.基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的界面适应性和厚度
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(4):516-21. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-049.