Suppr超能文献

三种生物陶瓷封闭剂在模拟体液中浸泡后采用基于封闭剂的充填方法的封闭能力。

Sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid.

作者信息

Singhal Rahul, Singla Meenu G, Wahi Palak, Bhasin Prashant, Garg Ashima, Nangia Divya

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;28(2):199-203. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_605_24. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

Abstract

AIM

The study aimed to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers, i.e., BioRoot RCS, CeraSeal, and Bio-C sealer, using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF).

METHODOLOGY

Eighty-eight extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars with mature apices and straight root canals were selected. Teeth were decoronated at 12 mm length from the apex. They were divided into 4 groups according to the sealer used ( = 22), i.e., control group (Group 1) - AH Plus (obturated using warm vertical compaction [WVC] technique) and experimental groups - Group 2 (BioRoot RCS), Group 3 (CeraSeal), and Group 4 (Bio-C sealer) (obturated using single-cone technique). Specimens in each group were further divided into two subgroups ( = 11) - Subgroup 1 (evaluation after 48 h) and Subgroup 2 (evaluation after immersion in SBF for 30 days). A dye penetration test was used for microleakage analysis using a stereomicroscope (10×). The collected data were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

After 48 h, the control group showed the least microleakage, and the difference was statistically significant compared to all experimental groups. After immersion in SBF for 30 days, no significant difference in microleakage was seen among all the groups.

CONCLUSION

The sealing ability of the bioceramic sealers with single-cone obturation when exposed to the SBF improved significantly after 30 days and was comparable to AH Plus using the WVC obturation technique. Thus, single-cone obturation with bioceramic sealers can be considered a viable alternative.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较三种生物陶瓷封闭剂,即BioRoot RCS、CeraSeal和Bio-C封闭剂,在模拟体液(SBF)中浸泡后采用基于封闭剂的充填方法的根尖封闭能力。

方法

选取88颗根尖成熟、根管笔直的拔除下颌单根前磨牙。牙齿从根尖处截短至12 mm长度。根据所使用的封闭剂将其分为4组(每组n = 22),即对照组(第1组)——AH Plus(采用热垂直加压[WVC]技术充填)和实验组——第2组(BioRoot RCS)、第3组(CeraSeal)和第4组(Bio-C封闭剂)(采用单锥技术充填)。每组样本进一步分为两个亚组(每组n = 11)——亚组1(48小时后评估)和亚组2(在SBF中浸泡30天后评估)。使用染料渗透试验通过体视显微镜(10×)进行微渗漏分析。对收集到的数据进行统计学分析。

结果

48小时后,对照组显示出最小的微渗漏,与所有实验组相比差异具有统计学意义。在SBF中浸泡30天后,所有组之间的微渗漏没有显著差异。

结论

采用单锥充填的生物陶瓷封闭剂在暴露于SBF 30天后,其封闭能力显著提高,与采用WVC充填技术的AH Plus相当。因此,生物陶瓷封闭剂的单锥充填可被视为一种可行的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/11878681/f9aaff8368c6/JCDE-28-199-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验