Xu Dan, Yao Chun, Gu Min
Department of Stomatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou City. Changzhou 213003, China. E-mail:
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2020 Aug;29(4):414-417.
To investigate the effect of Bio-Oss bone powder combined with Heal-All Oral repair membrane and Bio-Oss collagen on site preservation during implantology.
A total of 26 cases were randomly divided into 2 groups. In Bio-Oss bone powder group (13 cases), the sockets were filled with Bio-Oss bone powder, covering with Heal-All Oral repair membrane on the surface. In Bio-Oss collagen group (13 cases), the sockets were filled with Bio-Oss collagen only. The changes in alveolar bone density,height,width and new bone contour were evaluated with cone-beam CT(CBCT) after site preservation. The data were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software package.
There was no significant difference in new bone contour between 2 groups(P>0.05). The changes in height, width and grey level of alveolar bone between the two groups were significantly different after 3 months of follow-up(P<0.01), but the curative effect was similar(P>0.05).
There is no significant difference in the efficacy of site preservation between the two materials. However, the site preservation technique using collagen is simple, less invasive and less costly.
探讨Bio-Oss骨粉联合口腔修复膜及Bio-Oss胶原在种植术中位点保存的效果。
将26例患者随机分为2组。Bio-Oss骨粉组(13例),拔牙窝内填入Bio-Oss骨粉,表面覆盖口腔修复膜;Bio-Oss胶原组(13例),拔牙窝内仅填入Bio-Oss胶原。位点保存后采用锥形束CT(CBCT)评估牙槽骨密度、高度、宽度及新骨轮廓的变化。数据采用SPSS 17.0软件包进行分析。
两组新骨轮廓差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访3个月后,两组牙槽骨高度、宽度及灰度变化差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),但疗效相似(P>0.05)。
两种材料在位点保存疗效上差异无统计学意义。然而,使用胶原的位点保存技术操作简单、创伤小、成本低。