Suppr超能文献

术中使用导航和角度内镜对垂体瘤鼻内镜手术结果的差异独立影响:一项前瞻性研究。

Differential independent impact of the intraoperative use of navigation and angled endoscopes on the surgical outcome of endonasal endoscopy for pituitary tumors: a prospective study.

作者信息

Patil Ninad R, Dhandapani Sivashanmugam, Sahoo Sushant K, Chhabra Rajesh, Singh Apinderpreet, Dutta Pinaki, Walia Rama, Verma Roshan, Gupta Rijuneeta, Virk Ramandeep S, Ahuja Chirag K, Dhandapani Manju, Chaudhary Himanshi, Jangra Kiran, Gupta Sunil K

机构信息

Dept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Dept. of Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Aug;44(4):2291-2298. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01416-x. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

Abstract

Despite widespread popularity of navigation and angled endoscopes in endonasal endoscopy, there are hardly few studies on their efficacy with the extent of resection or retreatment. This is probably the first study to assess the independent impact of these adjuncts among pituitary tumors. Patients with pituitary tumors undergoing endonasal endoscopy were prospectively studied for their demographics, clinico-radiological features, intraoperative use of navigation, and angled endoscopes, in relation to gross total resection (GTR), near total resection (NTR), endocrine remission, and retreatment. Pertinent statistical analyses were performed. Among a total of 139 patients, navigation and angled endoscopes could be used in 54 and 48 patients, respectively, depending upon their availability rather than chosen as per the case. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics in relation to their use. The surgeon's perception of immediate benefit was noted among 51.9% while using navigation. The use of angled endoscopes towards the end of resection could help with additional tumor removal in 62.5% of patients. Overall, the use of navigation resulted in a significantly higher GTR (80.8% vs. 59.7%, OR 2.83, p = 0.01), a higher GTR/NTR (86.5% vs. 70.8%, OR 2.65, p = 0.04), and a lower retreatment rate (7.7% vs. 20.8%, OR 3.15, p = 0.05) than the others. In functioning tumors with cavernous sinus invasion, navigation had significantly increased remission rates (69.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.03). The use of angled endoscopes yielded a significantly higher GTR/NTR (91.7% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.04) and a lower retreatment rate (0% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.05) among only non-functioning adenomas. In multivariate analyses, the use of neuronavigation had a significant association with both GTR and retreatment rates (p values 0.005 and 0.02 respectively), independent of other confounding factors. The elective intraoperative use of navigation has a significant independent impact on the extent of resection and retreatment overall. While navigation results in better remission rates among functioning tumors with cavernous sinus invasion, angled endoscopy has a significant association with surgical outcomes in non-functioning tumors.

摘要

尽管导航和角度内镜在鼻内镜手术中广泛应用,但关于其在切除范围或再次治疗方面疗效的研究却很少。这可能是第一项评估这些辅助设备对垂体瘤独立影响的研究。对接受鼻内镜手术的垂体瘤患者进行前瞻性研究,观察其人口统计学、临床放射学特征、术中导航和角度内镜的使用情况,以及与全切除(GTR)、近全切除(NTR)、内分泌缓解和再次治疗的关系。进行了相关的统计分析。在总共139例患者中,根据设备可用性,分别有54例和48例患者使用了导航和角度内镜,而非根据病例选择。其使用的基线特征无显著差异。51.9%的外科医生在使用导航时认为有直接益处。在62.5%的患者中,切除末期使用角度内镜有助于额外切除肿瘤。总体而言,与其他方法相比,使用导航的患者全切除率显著更高(80.8%对59.7%,OR 2.83,p = 0.01),全切除/近全切除率更高(86.5%对70.8%,OR 2.65,p = 0.04),再次治疗率更低(7.7%对20.8%,OR 3.15,p = 0.05)。在侵犯海绵窦的功能性肿瘤中,导航显著提高了缓解率(69.2%对0%,p = 0.03)。仅在无功能性腺瘤中,使用角度内镜的患者全切除/近全切除率显著更高(91.7%对70.6%,p = 0.04),再次治疗率更低(0%对15.7%,p = 0.05)。在多变量分析中,使用神经导航与全切除率和再次治疗率均有显著关联(p值分别为0.005和0.02),独立于其他混杂因素。术中选择性使用导航对总体切除范围和再次治疗有显著的独立影响。虽然导航在侵犯海绵窦的功能性肿瘤中能带来更好的缓解率,但角度内镜在无功能性肿瘤的手术结果方面有显著关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验