• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪调节困难、人格特质与智能手机成瘾问题。

Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Personality, and Problematic Smartphone Use.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

出版信息

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Apr;24(4):275-281. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0328. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1089/cyber.2020.0328
PMID:33090002
Abstract

Emotion regulation has been proposed as a mechanism for the development of problematic smartphone use. In addition to examining the relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and problematic smartphone use, the current study sought to be the first to examine the relationship between subscales of emotion regulation difficulties and problematic smartphone use. It also sought to determine whether emotion regulation difficulties provide incremental prediction of problematic smartphone use over and above personality. Participants were 692 Australian university students (81% female; age in years  = 25.23,  = 7.48). They completed a measure of problematic smartphone use, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and a measure of Big Five personality (IPIP 120). Overall emotion regulation difficulties ( 0.40) and impulse control difficulties ( 0.42) were moderately associated with problematic smartphone use, as were the Big Five factors of neuroticism ( = 0.43) and conscientiousness ( = -0.38). Although emotion regulation difficulties predicted problematic smartphone use, they did not provide incremental prediction over and above the Big Five. Findings indicate that personality is a robust predictor of problematic smartphone use. Emotion regulation difficulties, such as impulsivity, offer insights into the specific ways that personality is expressed in problematic smartphone use.

摘要

情绪调节被认为是导致智能手机使用问题的一个机制。除了考察情绪调节困难与智能手机使用问题之间的关系外,本研究还首次考察了情绪调节困难的亚量表与智能手机使用问题之间的关系。本研究还试图确定情绪调节困难是否能在人格之外为智能手机使用问题提供额外的预测。参与者为 692 名澳大利亚大学生(81%为女性;年龄为 25.23 岁,标准差为 7.48 岁)。他们完成了智能手机使用问题量表、情绪调节困难量表以及大五人格量表(IPIP 120)的测试。总体情绪调节困难( = 0.40)和冲动控制困难( = 0.42)与智能手机使用问题呈中度相关,神经质( = 0.43)和尽责性( = -0.38)也是如此。尽管情绪调节困难可以预测智能手机使用问题,但它们并不能在大五人格之外提供额外的预测。研究结果表明,人格是智能手机使用问题的一个强有力的预测指标。情绪调节困难,如冲动性,为人格在智能手机使用问题中的具体表现提供了一些见解。

相似文献

1
Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Personality, and Problematic Smartphone Use.情绪调节困难、人格特质与智能手机成瘾问题。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Apr;24(4):275-281. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0328. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
2
Moderating Role of Gender in the Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Smartphone Addiction.五大人格特质与智能手机成瘾关系中的性别调节作用。
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Jun;91(2):577-585. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09718-5.
3
The relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and psychopathic personality characteristics.情绪调节困难与精神病态人格特征之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2014 Apr;5(2):186-94. doi: 10.1037/per0000025. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
4
Similarities and differences in the psychological factors associated with generalised problematic internet use, problematic social media use, and problematic online gaming.与泛化性问题性互联网使用、问题性社交媒体使用和问题性在线游戏相关的心理因素的异同。
Compr Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;134:152512. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152512. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
5
Bridging the links between Big Five personality traits and problematic smartphone use: A network analysis.大五人格特质与智能手机问题使用之间的联系:网络分析。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Feb 10;12(1):128-136. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00093. Print 2023 Mar 30.
6
The association between the Big Five personality traits and smartphone use disorder: A meta-analysis.大五人格特质与智能手机使用障碍的关系:一项元分析。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Oct 3;9(3):534-550. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00069. Print 2020 Oct 12.
7
The Role of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies on Problematic Smartphone Use: Comparison between Problematic and Non-Problematic Adolescent Users.认知情绪调节策略在智能手机问题使用中的作用:问题和非问题青少年用户的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;16(17):3142. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173142.
8
An emotional and cognitive model of problematic Internet use among college students: The full mediating role of cognitive factors.大学生网络问题使用:认知因素的完全中介作用的情绪和认知模型。
Addict Behav. 2020 Jun;105:106252. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106252. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
[Investigation of the compulsive and impulsive behavioral addictions among adolescents].[青少年强迫性和冲动性行为成瘾的调查]
Psychiatr Hung. 2014;29(2):152-7.
10
A test of the pathway model of problematic smartphone use.对问题性智能手机使用的路径模型的检验。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Jan 20;10(1):181-193. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00103.

引用本文的文献

1
Objectively Measured Smartphone Use and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Among College Students: Cross-Sectional Study.大学生中客观测量的智能手机使用情况与非自杀性自伤行为:横断面研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jul 30;12:e71264. doi: 10.2196/71264.
2
Manifestation of emotion regulation difficulties in intraindividual emotion dynamics.个体内情绪动态中情绪调节困难的表现
Cogn Emot. 2025 Jul 4:1-18. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2525481.
3
Early Maladaptive Schemas and Celebrity Worship: The Mediating Role of Sense of Coherence and Difficulty in Emotion Regulation.
早期适应不良图式与名人崇拜:连贯感和情绪调节困难的中介作用。
Psychiatr Q. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10151-9.
4
Exploring Differences in Four Types of Online Activities Across Individuals with and without Problematic Smartphone Use.探究有问题智能手机使用行为的个体与无此行为的个体在四种在线活动类型上的差异。
Psychiatr Q. 2024 Dec;95(4):579-597. doi: 10.1007/s11126-024-10090-x. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
5
Examining Self-Regulation and Problematic Smartphone Use in Canadian Adolescents: A Parallel Latent Growth Modeling Approach.审视加拿大青少年的自我调节与问题智能手机使用情况:一种平行潜变量增长建模方法。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Feb;54(2):468-479. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02071-x. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
6
Correlations between non-suicidal self-injury and problematic internet use among Chinese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中国青少年非自杀性自伤行为与网络使用问题之间的相关性:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 29;15:1408508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1408508. eCollection 2024.
7
Validation of the Chinese version of the Smartphone Distraction Scale.中文版智能手机注意力分散量表的验证
Heliyon. 2024 May 23;10(11):e31807. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31807. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
8
The relationship between nomophobia and latent classes of personality.手机恐惧症与人格潜在类型的关系。
Psych J. 2024 Oct;13(5):860-869. doi: 10.1002/pchj.758. Epub 2024 May 1.
9
Is having your cell phone the key to happiness, or does it really matter? Evidence from a randomized double-blind study.拥有手机是幸福的关键,还是这并不重要?一项随机双盲研究的证据。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 26;12(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01595-y.
10
Validation of a modified problematic use of mobile phones scale to examine problematic smartphone use and dependence.一种用于检测问题性智能手机使用及成瘾情况的改良版手机问题性使用量表的验证。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 19;10(2):e24832. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24832. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.