• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is having your cell phone the key to happiness, or does it really matter? Evidence from a randomized double-blind study.拥有手机是幸福的关键,还是这并不重要?一项随机双盲研究的证据。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 26;12(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01595-y.
2
Pedestrian self-reported use of smart phones: Positive attitudes and high exposure influence intentions to cross the road while distracted.行人自我报告的智能手机使用情况:积极态度和高暴露度会影响分心时过马路的意图。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
3
The ABC of happiness: Validation of the tridimensional model of subjective well-being (affect, cognition, and behavior) using Bifactor Polytomous Multidimensional Item Response Theory.幸福的ABC:使用双因素多分类多维项目反应理论对主观幸福感的三维模型(情感、认知和行为)进行验证。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 12;10(2):e24386. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24386. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
4
Self-transcendence or self-enhancement: People's perceptions of meaning and happiness in relation to the self.自我超越还是自我提升:人们对与自我相关的意义和幸福的认知。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Feb;152(2):590-610. doi: 10.1037/xge0001297. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
5
Prosocial spending encourages happiness: A replication of the only experiment reported in Dunn, Aknin, and Norton (2008).亲社会支出能促进幸福感:对邓恩、阿克宁和诺顿(2008 年)唯一报告的实验的复制。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 7;17(9):e0272434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272434. eCollection 2022.
6
Attention, mindwandering, and mood.注意、思维漫游和情绪。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Jul;72:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 May 3.
7
Cell-phone vs microphone recordings: Judging emotion in the voice.手机录音与麦克风录音:判断声音中的情感。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Sep;142(3):1261. doi: 10.1121/1.5000482.
8
Emotional experiences in technology-mediated and in-person interactions: an experience-sampling study.技术介导的和面对面交互中的情感体验:一项体验抽样研究。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Jun;36(4):750-757. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2043244. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
9
The affective profiles in the USA: happiness, depression, life satisfaction, and happiness-increasing strategies.美国人的情感特征:幸福、抑郁、生活满意度和增加幸福感的策略。
PeerJ. 2013 Sep 10;1:e156. doi: 10.7717/peerj.156. eCollection 2013.
10
Tell me who you are and I tell you how you feel: expected emotional reactions to success and failure are influenced by knowledge about a person's personality.告诉我你是谁,我就告诉你你的感受如何:对成功和失败的预期情绪反应会受到对一个人人格了解的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2011 Aug;46(4):310-20. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2010.547583. Epub 2011 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of cell phone presence on the control of visual attention during the Navon task.手机在场对纳冯任务中视觉注意控制的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 12;11(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01381-2.
2
A perceptual control theory of emotional action.情绪动作的知觉控制理论。
Cogn Emot. 2023 Nov-Dec;37(7):1167-1184. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2265234. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
3
Perceived usefulness of, engagement with, and effectiveness of virtual reality environments in learning industrial operations: the moderating role of openness to experience.虚拟现实环境在工业操作学习中的感知有用性、参与度及有效性:经验开放性的调节作用。
Virtual Real. 2023 Apr 24:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10055-023-00793-0.
4
The Impact of Enhancing Phone Activeness on the Negative Effect Induced by the Presence of a Cell Phone.增强手机活跃度对手机在场所产生负面影响的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 6;13:920878. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920878. eCollection 2022.
5
Reading emotions, reading people: Emotion perception and inferences drawn from perceived emotions.解读情绪,读懂他人:情绪感知以及从感知到的情绪中得出的推断。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Can Positive Affective Variables Mediate Intervention Effects on Physical Activity? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.积极情感变量能否介导干预对身体活动的影响?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 5;11:587757. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587757. eCollection 2020.
7
Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Personality, and Problematic Smartphone Use.情绪调节困难、人格特质与智能手机成瘾问题。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Apr;24(4):275-281. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0328. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Mobile Phone Addiction Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.儿童和青少年的手机成瘾:一项系统综述。
J Addict Nurs. 2019 Oct/Dec;30(4):261-268. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000309.
9
Music, emotion, and time perception: the influence of subjective emotional valence and arousal?音乐、情感与时间感知:主观情绪效价和唤醒度的影响?
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 17;4:417. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00417. eCollection 2013.
10
Measures of emotion: A review.情绪测量:综述
Cogn Emot. 2009 Feb 1;23(2):209-237. doi: 10.1080/02699930802204677.

拥有手机是幸福的关键,还是这并不重要?一项随机双盲研究的证据。

Is having your cell phone the key to happiness, or does it really matter? Evidence from a randomized double-blind study.

机构信息

Psychology Department, Florida Gulf Coast University, The Water School, Ft. Myers, FL, USA.

Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers, FL, USA.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 26;12(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01595-y.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-01595-y
PMID:38409094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898095/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Affect can influence people's perceptions, decisions, and the way they make sense of an experience. Some studies show that having one's cell phone removed will lead to negative emotional reactions, while others have found no significant impact on how we feel. In this paper we investigate the impact of cell phone possession and removal on participant's affective state.

METHODS

We use a randomized double-blind procedure to examine whether cell phone removal enhances negativity, promotes positivity, or is emotionally inconsequential. We measure affect using a PANAS self-report scale as well as a less transparent temporal-estimation procedure.

RESULTS

Our findings suggest that cell phone possession or removal has no influence on a person's affective state.

CONCLUSIONS

Measured through both the PANAS self-report scale and temporal estimation task, affect remained consistent regardless of cell phone possession. These results suggest that cell phones may not carry the emotional weight often attributed to them. This finding challenges a common theme revolving around the negative emotional impact of cell phones and technology. Consequently, these findings may have important implications for the generally perceived notion that cell phones are having a negative effect on people's emotions.

摘要

背景

情感会影响人们的感知、决策以及对体验的理解方式。一些研究表明,手机被拿走会导致负面的情绪反应,而另一些研究则没有发现手机对我们的情绪有显著影响。在本文中,我们研究了手机的拥有和移除对参与者情感状态的影响。

方法

我们采用随机双盲程序来检验手机的移除是否会增强负面情绪、促进正面情绪,或者对情绪没有影响。我们使用 PANAS 自我报告量表以及不太透明的时间估计程序来衡量情感。

结果

我们的发现表明,手机的拥有或移除对人的情感状态没有影响。

结论

通过 PANAS 自我报告量表和时间估计任务的测量,无论是否拥有手机,情感都保持一致。这些结果表明,手机可能没有通常认为的那样具有强烈的情感负荷。这一发现挑战了一个普遍存在的主题,即手机对情绪的负面影响。因此,这些发现可能对普遍认为手机对人们的情绪有负面影响的观点产生重要影响。