Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行时代的欧洲堕胎法规:政策应对的范围。

Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses.

机构信息

Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Soins et Santé Primaire, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP) INSERM 1018, INSERM, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Oct;47(4):e14. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200724. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unprecedented public health actions restricting movement and non-COVID related health services are likely to have affected abortion care during the pandemic in Europe. In the absence of a common approach to ensure access to this essential health service, we sought to describe the variability of abortion policies during the outbreak in Europe in order to identify strategies that improve availability and access to abortion in times of public health crises.

METHODS

We collected information from 46 countries/regions: 31 for which country-experts completed a survey and 15 for which we conducted a desk review. We describe abortion regulations and changes to regulations and practice during the pandemic.

RESULTS

During COVID-19, abortions were banned in six countries and suspended in one. Surgical abortion was less available due to COVID-19 in 12 countries/regions and services were not available or delayed for women with COVID-19 symptoms in eleven. No country expanded its gestational limit for abortion. Changes during COVID-19, mostly designed to reduce in-person consultations, occurred in 13 countries/regions. Altogether eight countries/regions provided home medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol beyond 9 weeks (from 9 weeks+6 days to 11 weeks+6 days) and 13 countries/regions up to 9 weeks (in some instances only misoprostol could be taken at home). Only six countries/regions offered abortion by telemedicine.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of a unified policy response to COVID-19 restrictions has widened inequities in abortion access in Europe, but some innovations including telemedicine deployed during the outbreak could serve as a catalyst to ensure continuity and equity of abortion care.

摘要

背景

限制行动和非 COVID 相关医疗服务的前所未有的公共卫生措施可能会影响欧洲大流行期间的堕胎护理。在缺乏确保获得这项基本医疗服务的共同方法的情况下,我们试图描述欧洲大流行期间堕胎政策的变化,以确定在公共卫生危机时期增加和获得堕胎的策略。

方法

我们从 46 个国家/地区收集信息:31 个国家/地区的国家专家完成了调查,15 个国家/地区进行了桌面审查。我们描述了堕胎法规以及大流行期间法规和实践的变化。

结果

在 COVID-19 期间,有六个国家/地区禁止堕胎,一个国家/地区暂停堕胎。由于 COVID-19,有 12 个国家/地区的手术堕胎服务可用性降低,有 11 个国家/地区的堕胎服务对有 COVID-19 症状的妇女不可用或延迟。没有一个国家扩大了堕胎的妊娠限制。COVID-19 期间发生的变化主要旨在减少面对面咨询,在 13 个国家/地区发生。总共有八个国家/地区提供米非司酮和米索前列醇的家庭医疗堕胎,超过 9 周(从 9 周+6 天到 11 周+6 天),13 个国家/地区可达 9 周(在某些情况下只能在家中服用米索前列醇)。只有六个国家/地区提供远程医疗堕胎。

结论

对 COVID-19 限制缺乏统一的政策应对,扩大了欧洲堕胎机会的不平等,但大流行期间部署的一些创新,包括远程医疗,可以成为确保堕胎护理连续性和公平性的催化剂。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
The use of telemedicine services for medical abortion.远程医疗服务在药物流产中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD013764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013764.pub2.

本文引用的文献

3
Abortion in the context of COVID-19: a human rights imperative.2019冠状病毒病背景下的堕胎:一项人权要务。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1758394. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1758394.
5
Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review.远程医疗用于药物流产:系统综述。
BJOG. 2019 Aug;126(9):1094-1102. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15684. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Induced abortion.人工流产
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):1160-1169. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex071.
7
Public funding for abortion where broadly legal.
Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):453-460. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
9
Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.全球孕产妇死亡原因:世卫组织系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. Epub 2014 May 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验