Suppr超能文献

危机与常规之间:我们应如何应对意外情况?

Between Crisis and Convention: How Should We Address Contingency?

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Sep;50(5):17-19. doi: 10.1002/hast.1181.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has brought about renewed conversation about equality and equity in the distribution of medical resources. Much of the recent conversation has focused on creating and implementing policies in times of crisis when resources are exhausted. Depending on how the pandemic develops, some communities may implement crisis measures, but many health care facilities are currently experiencing shortages of staff and materials even if the facilities have not implemented crisis standards. There is a need for shared conversation about equality and equity in these times of contingency between conventional and crisis medicine. To respond well to these challenges, I recommend that institutions rely on policy, professional education, and ethics consultation. As is the case with crisis policies, creating contingency policies requires that health care professionals decide on how, specifically, to achieve equity. A policy is only as effective as its implementation; therefore, institutions should invest in context-specific education on contingency policies. Finally, ethics consultation should be available for questions that contingency policies cannot address.

摘要

Covid-19 大流行再次引发了关于医疗资源分配公平和平等的讨论。最近的讨论大多集中在资源耗尽时制定和实施危机时期的政策。根据大流行的发展情况,一些社区可能会实施危机措施,但许多医疗保健设施目前即使没有实施危机标准,也面临着人员和材料短缺的问题。在常规医学和危机医学之间的应急时刻,需要就平等和公平进行共同讨论。为了很好地应对这些挑战,我建议各机构依靠政策、专业教育和伦理咨询。就像危机政策一样,制定应急政策需要医疗保健专业人员决定如何具体实现公平。一项政策的有效性取决于其实施情况;因此,各机构应投资于特定于上下文的应急政策教育。最后,对于应急政策无法解决的问题,应提供伦理咨询。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验