• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新冠疫情期间为99.9%的人提供护理:伦理、公平、流行病学以及每质量调整生命年成本如何为医疗政策提供信息。

Providing care for the 99.9% during the COVID-19 pandemic: How ethics, equity, epidemiology, and cost per QALY inform healthcare policy.

作者信息

Archer Stephen L

机构信息

4257Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Healthc Manage Forum. 2020 Sep;33(5):239-242. doi: 10.1177/0840470420939854. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1177/0840470420939854
PMID:32638633
Abstract

Managing healthcare in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) era should be guided by ethics, epidemiology, equity, and economics, not emotion. Ethical healthcare policies ensure equitable access to care for patients regardless of whether they have COVID-19 or another disease. Because healthcare resources are limited, a cost per Quality Life Year (QALY) approach to COVID-19 policy should also be considered. Policies that focus solely on mitigating COVID-19 are likely to be ethically or financially unsustainable. A cost/QALY approach could target resources to optimally improve QALYs. For example, most COVID-19 deaths occur in long-term care facilities, and this problem is likely better addressed by a focused long-term care reform than by a society-wide non-pharmacological intervention. Likewise, ramping up elective, non-COVID-19 care in low prevalence regions while expanding testing and case tracking in hot spots could reduce excess mortality from non-COVID-19 diseases and decrease adverse financial impacts while controlling the epidemic. Globally, only ∼0.1% of people have had a COVID-19 infection. Thus, ethical healthcare policy must address the needs of the 99.9%.

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)时代管理医疗保健应以伦理、流行病学、公平性和经济学为指导,而非情感。符合伦理的医疗保健政策确保患者无论患有COVID-19还是其他疾病都能公平获得医疗服务。由于医疗资源有限,还应考虑采用每质量调整生命年(QALY)成本的方法来制定COVID-19政策。仅专注于减轻COVID-19影响的政策在伦理或经济上可能不可持续。成本/QALY方法可以将资源用于以最佳方式改善QALY。例如,大多数COVID-19死亡发生在长期护理机构,与全社会范围的非药物干预相比,针对性的长期护理改革可能更有助于解决这一问题。同样,在低流行地区增加择期非COVID-19医疗服务,同时在热点地区扩大检测和病例追踪,既能降低非COVID-19疾病导致的额外死亡率,减少不利的经济影响,又能控制疫情。在全球范围内,只有约0.1%的人感染过COVID-19。因此,符合伦理的医疗保健政策必须满足那99.9%人群的需求。

相似文献

1
Providing care for the 99.9% during the COVID-19 pandemic: How ethics, equity, epidemiology, and cost per QALY inform healthcare policy.在新冠疫情期间为99.9%的人提供护理:伦理、公平、流行病学以及每质量调整生命年成本如何为医疗政策提供信息。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2020 Sep;33(5):239-242. doi: 10.1177/0840470420939854. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Ambulance Charters during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Equitable Access to Scarce Resources.新冠疫情期间的救护车租赁与稀缺资源的公平获取
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Oct;20(10):7-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1806379.
3
Prioritizing Equity in a Time of Scarcity: The COVID-19 Pandemic.在资源稀缺时期优先考虑公平:新冠疫情
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2760-2762. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05976-y. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
4
Between Crisis and Convention: How Should We Address Contingency?危机与常规之间:我们应如何应对意外情况?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Sep;50(5):17-19. doi: 10.1002/hast.1181.
5
Health coverage and what Kenya can learn from the COVID-19 pandemic.医疗覆盖范围以及肯尼亚能从新冠疫情中学到什么。
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020362. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020362.
6
Expanding coverage for essential care during COVID-19.扩大 COVID-19 期间基本护理的覆盖范围。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 May;26(5):195-196. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42920.
7
[Not Available].[不可用]。
Rev Med Suisse. 2020 Aug 5;16(701):1446-1447.
8
A tale of two countries: how decentralized organization and long-term investment build resilient healthcare systems.两国故事:分散式组织和长期投资如何构建有弹性的医疗体系。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Jul 1;6(3):201-203. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa036.
9
[Ethical considerations during health crisis: about SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic.].[健康危机期间的伦理考量:关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)大流行。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Nov 6;94:e202011149.
10
Ethical dilemmas in clinical care during COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间临床护理中的伦理困境
J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 May;70(Suppl 3)(5):S145-S148. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.35.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health and Health Care Experience in Those With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对多囊卵巢综合征患者健康及医疗体验的影响
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Feb 4;17:287-298. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S504439. eCollection 2025.
2
Mobilizing health equity through Computable Biomedical Knowledge (CBK): a call to action to the library, information sciences, and health informatics communities.通过可计算生物医学知识(CBK)调动卫生公平性:向图书馆、信息科学和健康信息学领域发出的行动呼吁。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):158-163. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1836. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
The impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare system resource use and costs in two provinces in Canada: An interrupted time series analysis.
COVID-19 大流行早期对加拿大两个省份医疗保健系统资源利用和成本的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0290646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290646. eCollection 2023.
4
The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on medical assistance in dying.2019 冠状病毒病对医疗协助死亡的影响。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 1;16(3):125-129. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000607. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
5
Non-COVID outcomes associated with the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic effects study (COPES): A systematic review and meta-analysis.与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行影响研究(COPES)相关的非 COVID 结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0269871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269871. eCollection 2022.
6
Virtual Support in Dementia: A Possible Viable Strategy for Caregivers.痴呆症的虚拟支持:照顾者的一种可行策略
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 13;12:662253. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.662253. eCollection 2021.
7
Modelling optimal vaccination strategy for SARS-CoV-2 in the UK.在英国建立 SARS-CoV-2 的最佳疫苗接种策略模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 May 6;17(5):e1008849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008849. eCollection 2021 May.