School of International Business, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China.
School of Statistics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 15;765:142759. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142759. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Fostering energy efficiency is one of the most effective ways to sustain economic growth while addressing climate change and limiting emissions. On the other hand, the pattern of international trade has changed many folds. The present study quantified the value-added trade (VAT) and developed a simultaneous equation model to empirically analyze the impact of value-added trade on energy efficiency in the global value chains (GVC). The Super-SBM model is used to estimate energy-efficiency. Empirical results indicate that India, Brazil, USA, Poland, France, Turkey, Israel, Italy are super-energy efficient, as their efficiency score is greater than 1. Secondly, value-added trade significantly improves energy efficiency by 0.434 after controlled the time and country effects. In addition, trade is divided into value-added exports and value-added imports to describe the internal trade mechanism, which depicts that the magnitude of the energy efficiency effect of value-added exports (0.011) is greater than that of imports (0.009). The findings also suggest that investment in R&D, foreign investment, and human education significantly improves energy efficiency. Foreign direct investment (FDI) positively increases the energy efficiency after controlled the unobserved fixed effects of country and year. It reflects the importance of the technology diffusion on increasing energy efficiency through FDI. Additionally, political regimes have also major impacts on both energy efficiency and value-added trade.
促进能源效率是在应对气候变化和限制排放的同时保持经济增长的最有效方法之一。另一方面,国际贸易格局发生了多方面的变化。本研究量化了附加值贸易(VAT),并建立了一个联立方程模型,从实证上分析了全球价值链(GVC)中附加值贸易对能源效率的影响。采用超-SBM 模型来估计能源效率。实证结果表明,印度、巴西、美国、波兰、法国、土耳其、以色列和意大利是超级能源效率国家,因为它们的效率得分大于 1。其次,在控制了时间和国家效应后,附加值贸易显著提高了 0.434 的能源效率。此外,贸易分为附加值出口和附加值进口,以描述内部贸易机制,这表明附加值出口(0.011)对能源效率的影响大于进口(0.009)。研究结果还表明,研发投资、外国投资和人力教育显著提高了能源效率。在控制了国家和年份的未观测固定效应后,外国直接投资(FDI)对能源效率的正向影响增加。这反映了通过外国直接投资促进能源效率提高的技术扩散的重要性。此外,政治制度对能源效率和附加值贸易也有重大影响。